Prediction model for labour dystocia occurring in the active phase

References

• ACOG Committee, 2019. Opinion no. 766: approaches to limit intervention during labour and birth. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 133, e164–e173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics, 2016. Practice Bulletin No. 173. Practice Bulletin No. 173: foetal macrosomia. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 128, e195–e209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ängeby, K., et al., 2018. Prevalence of prolonged latent phase and labour outcomes: review of birth records in a Swedish population. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 63 (1), 33–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo Júnior, E., et al., 2017. Macrosomia. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 38, 83–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, C. and Voutsos, L.J., 2013. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development’, Society for Maternal-Foetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists workshop. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 121 (3), 686–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beta, J., et al., 2019. Maternal and neonatal complications of foetal macrosomia: cohort study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 54 (3), 319–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmann, E.J. and Libhaber, E., 2007. Accuracy of cervical assessment in the active phase of labour. BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 114 (7), 833–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalin, S., 2009. Spatiotemporal electromyography during human labour to monitor propagation of the uterine contraction wave and diagnose dystocia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11, 53–55.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S.K., et al., 2016. Sonographic assessment of foetal occiput position during labour for the prediction of labour dystocia and perinatal outcomes. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 29 (24), 3988–3992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W.R., 2010. The natural history of the normal first stage of labour. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 116 (3), 772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conningham, F.G., et al., 2018. Williams obstetrics. 25th ed, vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 214–219.
   Google Scholar
• Coomarasamy, A., et al., 2005. Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review. BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 112 (11), 1461–1466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, E., 1954. The graphic analysis of labour. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 68 (6), 1568–1575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman, W.A., et al., 2018. Defining failed induction of labour. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 218 (1), 122.e1–122.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautakangas, T., et al., 2018. Impact of obesity and other risk factors on labour dystocia in term primiparous women: a case control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18 (1), 304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henrichs, C., et al., 2003. Detecting foetal macrosomia with abdominal circumference alone. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 48 (5), 339–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmich, N., et al., 2018. Impact factors on foetal descent rates in the active phase of labour: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 46 (6), 579–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahaee, J., et al., 2020. Preand during- labour predictors of dystocia in active phase of labour: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20 (1), 425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, G., Monteiro, S., and Salama, S., 2012. Sample size calculations: should the emperor’s clothes be off the peg or made to measure? BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 345, e5278.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shi, Q., et al., 2016. Labour patterns in Chinese women in Chongqing. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 123 (Suppl 3), 57–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Souka, A.P., et al., 2003. Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the foetal head position in normal and obstructed labour. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 13 (1), 59–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tempest, N., Lane, S., and Hapangama, D., 2020. Babies in occiput posterior position are significantly more likely to require an emergency cesarean birth compared with babies in occiput transverse position in the second stage of labour: a prospective observational study. Acta obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 99 (4), 537–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Obstetric Group of Obstetrics and Gynecology Branch of Chinese Medical Association, 2014. Specialist consensus on new labour standards and treatment. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 49, 486.
   Google Scholar
• Waldenström, U. and Ekéus, C., 2017. Risk of labour dystocia increases with maternal age irrespective of parity: a population-based register study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 96 (9), 1063–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, T.P. and Mercer, B.M., 2009. The management of preterm premature rupture of the membranes near the limit of foetal viability. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 201 (3), 230–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, 2018. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience [S/OL](2018-02-15) [2018-08-18]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/intrapartum-care guidelines/en/ [Accessed 06 Aug 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., et al., 2010. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labour with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 116 (6), 1281–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar