1,858
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Women’s experiences of birth and birth options counselling after laparoscopic or open myomectomy

ORCID Icon, , , , & ORCID Icon
Article: 2205516 | Received 26 Aug 2022, Accepted 16 Apr 2023, Published online: 18 May 2023

References

  • Al-Zirqi, I., et al., 2010. Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 117 (7), 809–820.
  • Amoah, A., et al., 2021. Appraisal of national and international uterine fibroid management guidelines: a systematic review. BJOG, 129 (3), 356–364.
  • Attanasio, L. B., Kozhimannil, K. B. and Kjerulff, K. H., 2019. Women’s preference for vaginal birth after a first delivery by cesarean. Birth, 46 (1), 51–60.
  • Bishop, P. A. and Herron, R. L., 2015. Use and Misuse of the Likert Item Responses and Other Ordinal Measures. Int J Exerc Sci, 8 (3), 297–302.
  • Care Quality Comission 2014. Barts health NHS trust quality report. London: Trust Offices Aneurin Bevan House.
  • Clarke, V. and Braun, V., 2014. Thematic analysis. In: Teo T, ed. Encyclopedia of critical psychology. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Devereaux, P. J., et al., 2001. Differences between perspectives of physicians and patients on anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: observational study. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 323 (7323), 1218–1222.
  • Feeley, C. and Thomson, G., 2016. Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16, 59.
  • Fukuda, M., et al., 2013. Comparison of the perinatal outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 76 (4), 203–208.
  • Gambacorti-Passerini, Z., et al., 2016. Trial of labor after myomectomy and uterine rupture: a systematic review. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 95 (7), 724–734.
  • Gambacorti-Passerini, Z. M., et al., 2018. Vaginal birth after prior myomectomy. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 231, 198–203.
  • Gimovsky, A. C., et al., 2020. Perinatal outcomes of women undergoing cesarean delivery after prior myomectomy. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 33 (13), 2153–2158.
  • RCOG 2015. Birth after previous caesarean birth: Green top guideline No. 45. National Institute of Clinical Excellence. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg45/
  • Hirsch, M., et al., 2020. Googling fibroids: A critical appraisal of information available on the internet. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 250, 224–230.
  • Kim, H. Y., 2017. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 42 (2), 152–155.
  • King, N., et al., 2018. Pregnancy outcomes after vaginal trial of labour following myomectomy. The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynaecology, 25 (7), supplement, S84.
  • Landon, M. B., et al., 2006. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 108 (1), 12–20.
  • Lee, S. J., et al., 2020. Nationwide population-based cohort study of adverse obstetric outcomes in pregnancies with myoma or following myomectomy: retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20 (1), 716.
  • Mara, M., et al., 2016. Peri-procedural, pregnancy and peripartum complications in patients with laparoscopic or open myomectomy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynaecology, 23 (7), 13–14. Available at: PlumX Metrics.
  • Milazzo, G. N., et al., 2017. Myoma and myomectomy: Poor evidence concern in pregnancy. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 43 (12), 1789–1804.
  • Nilsson, C., et al., 2017. Vaginal birth after caesarean: Views of women from countries with low VBAC rates. Women and Birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 30 (6), 481–490.
  • Odejinmi, F., et al., 2020. Caesarean section in women following an abdominal myomectomy: a choice or a need? Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 12 (1), 57–60.
  • Schoorel, E. N., et al., 2014. Vaginal birth after a caesarean section: the development of a Western European population-based prediction model for deliveries at term. BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 121 (2), 194–201; discussion 201.
  • Smith, J. A. and Osborn, M., 2015. Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain. British Journal of Pain, 9 (1), 41–42.
  • Stewart, E. A., et al., 2017. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 124 (10), 1501–1512.
  • Sundjaja, J., Shrestha, R. and Krishan, K., 2022. McNemar And Mann-Whitney U tests. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing.
  • Tahseen, S. and Griffiths, M., 2010. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 117 (1), 5–19.
  • Ugoni, A. and Walker, B. F., 1995. The Chi square test: an introduction. COMSIG Rev, 4 (3), 61–64.
  • van Mello, N. M., et al., 2010. Salpingotomy or salpingectomy in tubal ectopic pregnancy: what do women prefer? Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 21 (5), 687–693.
  • Weibel, H., et al., 2014. Perspectives of obstetricians on labour and delivery after abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal D'obstetrique et Gynecologie du Canada : JOGC, 36 (2), 128–132.