1,202
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Perinatal outcomes of twin emergency cerclage: comparison with expectant treatment and singleton emergency cerclage

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Article: 2211658 | Received 26 Dec 2022, Accepted 03 May 2023, Published online: 13 May 2023

References

  • Abbasi, N., Barrett, J. and Melamed, N., 2018. Outcomes following rescue cerclage in twin pregnancies. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 31 (16), 2195–2201.
  • Can, E., Oğlak, S. C. and Ölmez, F., 2022. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of expectantly managed pregnancies with previable preterm premature rupture of membranes. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 48 (7), 1740–1749.
  • Chatzakis, C., et al. 2020. Emergency cerclage in singleton pregnancies with painless cervical dil atation: A meta-analysis. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 99 (11), 1444–1457.
  • Chun, S., et al. 2018. Effects of emergency cerclage on the neonatal outcomes of preterm twin pregnancies compared to preterm singleton pregnancies: A neonatal focus. PloS One, 13 (11), e0208136.
  • Costa, M. M. F., et al. 2019. Emergency cerclage: gestational and neonatal outcomes. Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira, 65 (5), 598–602.
  • Kawwass, J. and Badell, M., 2018. Maternal and Fetal Risk Associated With Assisted Reproductive Technology. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 132 (3), 763–772.
  • Locatelli, A., et al. 1999. Amnioreduction in emergency cerclage with prolapsed membranes: compari son of two methods for reducing the membranes. American Journal of Perinatology, 16 (2), 73–77.
  • Mcdonald, I., 1978. Incompetence of the cervix. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 18 (1), 34–37.
  • Miller, E., Rajan, P. and Grobman, W., 2014. Outcomes after physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin gestations. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 211 (1), 46.e1-5–46.e5.
  • Park, J., et al. 2018. Outcomes of physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies with acute cervical insufficiency compared to singleton pregnancies. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 46 (8), 845–852.
  • Rebarber, A., et al. 2014. Outcomes of emergency or physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies compared to singleton pregnancies. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 173, 43–47.
  • Roman, A., et al. 2016. Cerclage in twin pregnancy with dilated cervix between 16 to 24 weeks of gestation: retrospective cohort study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 215 (1), 98.e1–98.e11.
  • TUNç, Ş., et al. 2022. The evaluation of the antepartum and intrapartum risk factors in predi cting the risk of birth asphyxia. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 48 (6), 1370–1378.
  • Vink, J. and Feltovich, H., 2016. Cervical etiology of spontaneous preterm birth. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 21 (2), 106–112.
  • Wei, M., et al. 2021. A comparison of pregnancy outcome of emergency modified transvaginal c ervicoisthmic cerclage performed in twin and singleton pregnancies. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 303 (5), 1197–1205.
  • Zeng, C., et al. 2022. Pregnancy outcomes and factors affecting the clinical effects of emerg ency cerclage in twin pregnancies with cervical dilation and prolapsed membranes. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 157 (2), 313–321.