Decoding the dynamics of BIM use practice in construction projects

References

• Allen, R.K., et al., 2005. Promise and barriers to technology enabled and open project team collaboration. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 131 (4), 301–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aranda-Mena, G., et al., 2009. Building information modelling demystified: does it make business sense to adopt BIM? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2 (3), 419–434.
   Google Scholar
• Barley, S.R., 1986. Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31 (1), 78–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlish, K., and Sullivan, K., 2012. How to measure the benefits of BIM – a case study approach. Automation in Construction, 24, 149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., and Volm, J.M., 2013. The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM). International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier Ltd and APM IPMA, 31 (7), 971–980.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, D., et al., 2015. Practices and effectiveness of Building Information Modelling in construction projects in China. Automation in Construction, Elsevier B.V., 49, 113–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, D., et al., 2017. Identifying and contextualising the motivations for BIM implementation in construction projectsAn empirical study in China. International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier Ltd and Association for Project Management and the International Project Management Association, 35 (4), 658–669.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Liu, A. M. M., and Hua, Y. (2017). An exploration of the interaction between BIM technology and the business process of a construction organization in BIM implementation. In: Building Information Modelling (BIM) in design, construction and operations II, 169, 177–189.
   Google Scholar
• CURT. 2004. Collaboration, integrated information and the project lifecycle in building design, construction and operation. Cincinnati, OH: Construction Users Roundatable.
   Google Scholar
• Desanctis, G., and Poole, M.S., 1994. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5 (2), 121–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dossick, C.S., and Neff, G., 2010. Organizational divisions in BIM-enabled commercial construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136 (4), 459–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman, C., et al., 2011. BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ewenstein, B., and Whyte, J., 2009. Knowledge practices in design: the role of visual representations as ‘epistemic objects. Organization Studies, 30 (1), 7–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gade, P.N., et al., 2019. A holistic analysis of a BIM-mediated building design process using activity theory. Construction Management and Economics, Routledge, 37 (6), 336–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gha, A., et al., 2017. “Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake : clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 75, 1046–1053.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1984. Elements of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groleau, C., et al., 2012. From hand drawings to computer visuals: confronting situated and institutionalized practices in an architecture. Organization Science, 23 (3), 17–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, A., Boodai, F., and Asmar, M.E., 2013. State of practice of building information modeling in mechanical and electrical construction industries. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139 (10), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, M., and Linderoth, H.C.J., 2010. The influence of contextual elements, actors’ frames of reference, and technology on the adoption and use of ICT in construction projects: a Swedish case study. Construction Management and Economics, 28 (1), 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M.R., and Karsten, H., 2008. Giddens’s structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 32 (1), 127–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, T.T., Mahdjoubi, L., and Mason, J., 2017. A framework to assist in the analysis of risks and rewards of adopting BIM for SMEs in the UK. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management ISSN, 23 (6), 740–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad, H., 2019. Black boxing BIM : the public client’ s strategy in BIM implementation. Construction Management and Economics, Routledge, 37 (1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderoth, H.C.J., 2010. Understanding adoption and use of BIM as the creation of actor networks. Automation in Construction, Elsevier B.V., 19 (1), 66–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderoth, H.C.J., 2017. From visions to practice – the role of sensemaking, institutional logic and pragmatic practice. Construction Management and Economics, Routledge, 6193, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Nederveen, S.V., and Hertogh, M., 2017. Understanding effects of BIM on collaborative design and construction : An empirical study in China. International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier Ltd, APM and IPMA, 35 (4), 686–698.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Q., et al., 2018. Activity theory-based analysis of BIM implementation in building O&M and first response. Automation in Construction, 85, 317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., et al., 2020. Critical strategies for enhancing BIM implementation in AEC projects: perspectives from Chinese practitioners. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146 (2), 05019019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki, T., Kerosuo, H., and Ma, T., 2015. Site managers’ daily work and the uses of building information modelling in construction site management. Construction Management and Economics, Routledge, 33 (3), 163–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R., and Paavola, S., 2014. Beyond the BIM utopia: approaches to the development and implementation of building information modeling. Automation in Construction, 43, 84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neff, G., Fiore-Silfvast, B., and Dossick, C.S., 2010. A case study of the failure of digital communication to cross knowledge boundaries in virtual construction. Information Communication and Society, 13 (4), 556–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W.J., 1992. The duality of technology : rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3 (3), 398–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W.J., 2000. Using technology and constituting structures : a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science Publication, 11 (4), 404–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W.J., and Gash, D.C., 1994. Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 12 (2), 174–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadonikolaki, E., van Oel, C., and Kagioglou, M., 2019. Organising and managing boundaries: a structurational view of collaboration with building information modelling (BIM). International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier Ltd and Association for Project Management and the International Project Management Association, 37 (3), 378–394.
   Google Scholar
• Poirier, E.A., Staub-french, S., and Forgues, D., 2015. Measuring the impact of BIM on labor productivity in a small specialty contracting enterprise through action-research. Automation in Construction, 58, 74–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryke, S., and Smyth, H., 2012. The management of complex projects: a relationship approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sackey, E., Tuuli, M., and Dainty, A., 2015. Sociotechnical systems approach to BIM implementation in a multidisciplinary construction context. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31 (1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowe, K., et al., 2015. Capturing the return on investment of all-in building information modeling: structured approach. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, ASCE, 20 (1), 04014027.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, P., 2013. Labor-productivity declines in the construction industry: causes and remedies (another look). AECbytes Viewpoint.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, P., Goodrum, P.M., and Haas, C.T., 2001. U.S. construction labor productivity trends, 1970–1998. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127 (5), 428–429.
   Google Scholar
• Vakkayil, J., 2010. Activity theory: a useful framework for analysing project-based organizations. Vikalpa, 35 (3), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R., 2006. Project-based firms: new organizational form or variations on a theme? Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, 15 (1), 77–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington, R., 2015. Giddens, structuration theory and strategy as practice. Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice, 2nd ed., 145–164. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J., 2011. Managing digital coordination of design: emerging hybrid practices in an institutionalized project setting. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 1 (3), 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 2017. Case study research and applications: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zomer, T., et al., 2020. Exploring the influence of socio-historical constructs on BIM implementation: an activity theory perspective. Construction Management and Economics, Routledge, 39 (1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar