The lifecycle impact and value capture of circular business models in the built environment

References

• Anand, C.K., and Amor, B., 2017. Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: a critical review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 67, 408–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S.C., Birgisdottir, H., and Birkved, M., 2022. Life cycle assessments of circular economy in the built environment—a scoping review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14 (11), 6887.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, G., Wilkinson, S., and Cilliers, E.J., 2023. A framework for sustainable adaptive reuse: understanding vacancy and underuse in existing urban buildings. Frontiers in sustainable cities, 5, 985656.
   Google Scholar
• Arup. (2016). Circular economy in the built environment - Arup. https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/circular-economy-in-the-built-environment
   Google Scholar
• Assefa, G., and Ambler, C., 2017. To demolish or not to demolish: life cycle consideration of repurposing buildings. Sustainable cities and society, 28, 146–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, H., Moncaster, A., and Al-Tabbaa, A., 2017. Decision-making for the demolition or adaptation of buildings. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers: forensic engineering, 170 (3), 144–156.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, H., et al., 2021. Retention not demolition: how heritage thinking can inform carbon reduction. Journal of architectural conservation, 27 (3), 176–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, C., et al., 2014. Products that go round: exploring product life extension through design. Journal of cleaner production, 69, 10–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassarre, B., et al., 2017. Bridging sustainable business model innovation and user-driven innovation: a process for sustainable value proposition design. Journal of cleaner production, 147, 175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos, J., Batterman, S.A., and Freire, F., 2014. Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis of three building types in a residential area in Lisbon. Energy and buildings, 69, 344–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, H., et al., 2022. Switching the focus from product function to business profit: introducing Business Model LCA (BM-LCA). E3S web of conferences, 349, 06004.
   Google Scholar
• Bejrum, H., 1991. Livscykelekonomiska kalkyler för byggnader och fastigheter.
   Google Scholar
• Bernal-Torres, C.A., et al., 2021. Continuous improvement and business sustainability in companies of an emerging market: empirical analysis. Journal of industrial engineering and management, 14 (4), 771–787.
   Google Scholar
• Bocken, N.M.P., et al., 2016. Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of industrial and production engineering, 33 (5), 308–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocken, N.M.P., et al., 2014. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of cleaner production, 65, 42–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böckin, D., et al., 2022. Business model life cycle assessment: a method for analysing the environmental performance of business. Sustainable production and consumption, 32, 112–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boons, F., and Lüdeke-Freund, F., 2013. Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of cleaner production, 45, 9–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragança, L., Mateus, R., and Koukkari, H., 2010. Building sustainability assessment. Sustainability, 2 (7), 2010–2023.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkø, R., Nielsen, S.B., and Meel, J.V., 2015. Access over ownership – a typology of shared space. Facilities, 33 (11–12), 736–751.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkø, R., van Meel, J., & Nielsen, S. (2014). The shared building portfolio: An exploration and typology. CIB Facilities Management Conference 21–23 May 2014. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264868394
   Google Scholar
• Bullen, P.A., 2007. Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildings. Facilities, 25 (1–2), 20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bullen, P.A., and Love, P.E.D., 2010. The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: views from the field. Cities, 27 (4), 215–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çimen, Ö., 2021. Construction and built environment in circular economy: a comprehensive literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 305, 127180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daunorienė, A., et al., 2015. Evaluating sustainability of sharing economy business models. Procedia - Social and behavioral sciences, 213, 836–841.
   Google Scholar
• De Wolf, C., Pomponi, F., and Moncaster, A., 2017. Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: a review and critique of current industry practice. Energy and buildings, 140, 68–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschamps, J., et al., 2018. Is open-loop recycling the lowest preference in a circular economy? Answering through LCA of glass powder in concrete. Journal of cleaner production, 185, 14–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, F., Cave, C., & Worthington, J. (Eds.) 2016. Planning office space (British edition). New York: The Architectural Press Lth.
   Google Scholar
• Dytianquin, N., et al., 2021. Circularity in selected EU countries: the case of construction and demolition industry. IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, 855, 012017.
   Google Scholar
• Eberhardt, L., Birgisdottir, H., and Birkved, M., 2019. Comparing life cycle assessment modelling of linear vs. circular building components. IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, 225, 012039.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A.C., and McManus, S.E., 2007. Methodological fit in management field research monitor executive development. Academy of management review, 32 (4), 1155–1179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation 2013. Towards the circular economy, opportunities for the consumer goods sector 2 Pre-print version.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation 2015. Delivering the circular economy. A toolkit for policymakers.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J., Duarte Pinheiro, M., and De Brito, J., 2015. Economic and environmental savings of structural buildings refurbishment with demolition and reconstruction - a Portuguese benchmarking. Journal of building engineering, 3, 114–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, G., and Kreinin, H., 2020. A review of environmental impact indicators of cultural heritage buildings: a circular economy perspective. Environmental research letters, 15, 043003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francart, N., et al., 2020. Sharing indoor space: stakeholders’ perspectives and energy metrics. Buildings and cities, 1 (1), 70–85.
   Google Scholar
• Fufa, S.M., Flyen, C., and Flyen, A.C., 2021. How can existing buildings with historic values contribute to achieving emission reduction ambitions? Applied sciences (Switzerland), 11 (13), 5978.
   Google Scholar
• Gaspar, P.L., and Santos, A.L., 2015. Embodied energy on refurbishment vs. demolition: a southern Europe case study. Energy and buildings, 87, 386–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissdoerfer, M., et al., 2017. The circular economy – a new sustainability paradigm? Journal of cleaner production, 143, 757–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., and Ulgiati, S., 2018. Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 178, 618–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi, S., Lavagna, M., and Campioli, A., 2019. Circular economy and regeneration of building stock in the Italian context: policies, partnership and tools. IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, 225, 012065.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, S., et al., 2022. Drivers and barriers towards circular economy in the building sector: stakeholder interviews and analysis of five european countries policies and practices. Journal of cleaner production, 336, 130395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, J., et al., 2019. Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: the case of the built environment. Procedia CIRP, 80, 619–624.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, M., et al., 2021. The battle of the buzzwords: a comparative review of the circular economy and the sharing economy concepts. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 38, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höjer, M., and Mjörnell, K., 2018. Measures and steps for more efficient use of buildings. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10 (6), 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogmartens, R., et al., 2014. Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA as sustainability assessment tools. Environmental impact assessment review, 48, 27–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M.U., et al., 2020. Circular economy and the construction industry: existing trends, challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 130, 109948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huuhka, S., and Lahdensivu, J., 2016. Statistical and geographical study on demolished buildings. Building research and information, 44 (1), 73–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huuhka, S., and Vestergaard, I., 2020. Building conservation and the circular economy: a theoretical consideration. Journal of cultural heritage management and sustainable development, 10 (1), 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itard, L., and Klunder, G., 2007. Comparing environmental impacts of renovated housing stock with new construction. Building research and information, 35 (3), 252–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, P.A., et al., 2022. Sustainable building renovation–strategies and processes. Construction management and economics, 40 (3), 157–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., and Hekkert, M., 2017. Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions. SSRN electronic journal, 127, 221–232.
   Google Scholar
• Knäble, D., et al., 2022. The impact of the circular economy on sustainable development: a European panel data approach. Sustainable production and consumption, 34, 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., and Seppälä, J., 2018. Circular economy: the concept and its limitations. Ecological economics, 143, 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyrö, R., 2020. Share, preserve, adapt, rethink - a focused framework for circular economy. IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, 588, 042034.
   Google Scholar
• Kyrö, R., and Lundgren, R., 2022. Your vibe attracts your tribe - the adaptive reuse of buildings delivering aesthetic experience and social inclusion. IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, 1101, 062014.
   Google Scholar
• Langston, C. (2008). The sustainability implications of building adaptive reuse. In Chinese Research Institute of Construction Management (CRIOCM) International Symposium, Beijing, China. http://epublications.bond.edu.au/sustainable_development/4
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, V.G., et al., 2022. What are the challenges in assessing circular economy for the built environment? A literature review on integrating LCA, LCC and S-LCA in life cycle sustainability assessment, LCSA. Journal of building engineering, 50, 104203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leising, E., Quist, J., and Bocken, N., 2018. Circular economy in the building sector: three cases and a collaboration tool. Journal of cleaner production, 176, 976–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, R., Kyrö, R., and Jylhä, T., 2022. Access-based consumption in the built environment: sharing spaces. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14 (9), 5550.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, R., Kyrö, R., and Olander, S., 2023. Adapting for shared use – evaluating the lifecycle carbon impact. IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, 1196 (1), 012038.
   Google Scholar
• Manninen, K., et al., 2018. Do circular economy business models capture intended environmental value propositions? Journal of cleaner production, 171, 413–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minunno, R., et al., 2020. Exploring environmental benefits of reuse and recycle practices: a circular economy case study of a modular building. Resources, conservation and recycling, 160, 104855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moncaster, A., et al., 2022. Embodied carbon of concrete in buildings, part 2: are the messages accurate? Buildings and cities, 3 (1), 334–355.
   Google Scholar
• Moncaster, A., et al., 2018. Why method matters: temporal, spatial and physical variations in LCA and their impact on choice of structural system. Energy and buildings, 173, 389–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munarim, U., and Ghisi, E., 2016. Environmental feasibility of heritage buildings rehabilitation. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 58, 235–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munaro, M.R., Tavares, S.F., and Bragança, L., 2020. Towards circular and more sustainable buildings: A systematic literature review on the circular economy in the built environment. In Journal of cleaner production, 260, 121134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir, M.H.A., et al., 2017. Comparing linear and circular supply chains: a case study from the construction industry. International journal of production economics, 183, 443–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olander, S., 2007. Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management. Construction management and economics, 25 (3), 277–287.
   Google Scholar
• Olander, S., and Atkin, B., 2010. Stakeholder management – gains and pains. In: E. Chinyjo and P. Olomolaiye, eds. Construction stakeholder management. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Osterwalder, A., et al., 2011. Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers. African journal of business management, 5 (7), 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., and Tucci, C.L., 2005. Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the association for information systems, 16, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla-Rivera, A., Russo-Garrido, S., and Merveille, N., 2020. Addressing the social aspects of a circular economy: a systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12, 7912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phyrr, S., Cooper, J., and Wofford, L., 1989. Real estate investment: strategy analysis and decision. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pomponi, F., and Moncaster, A., 2016. Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment – what does the evidence say? Journal of environmental management, 181, 687–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajala, P., et al., 2022. Profitability in construction: how does building renovation business fare compared to new building business. Construction management and economics, 40 (3), 223–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reike, D., Vermeulen, W.J.V., and Witjes, S., 2018. The circular economy: new or refurbished as CE 3.0?—Exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options. Resources, conservation and recycling, 135, 246–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritala, P., et al., 2018. Sustainable business model adoption among S&P 500 firms: a longitudinal content analysis study. Journal of cleaner production, 170, 216–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röck, M., et al., 2020. Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – the hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation. Applied energy, 258, 114107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, B., Esnaashary Esfahani, M., and Haas, C., 2019. A methodology to analyze the net environmental impacts and building’s cost performance of an adaptive reuse project: a case study of the Waterloo County Courthouse renovations. Environment systems and decisions, 39 (4), 419–438.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., and Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students fifth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Sundling, R., 2019. Factors influencing the outcome of renovation projects. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Sundling, R., et al., 2019. Lifecycle profit analysis of prefabricated multi-active façades. International journal of building pathology and adaptation, 37 (5), 565–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Commission on Environment and Development 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future Towards Sustainable Development 2. Part II. Common Challenges Population and Human Resources 4
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, B.J., 2011. THE GREENEST BUILDING (IS THE ONE THAT YOU DON’T BUILD!) Effective Techniques for Sustainable Adaptive Reuse/Renovation. 6. http://meridian.allenpress.com/jgb/article-pdf/6/1/1/1765453/jgb_6_1_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vladimirova, D., 2019. Building sustainable value propositions for multiple stakeholders: a practical tool. Journal of business models, 7 (1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Yung, H.K.E., and Chan, H.W.E., 2012. Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon cities. Habitat international, 36 (3), 352–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar