Comparing effects of different trellis systems for organically grown ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula)

References

• Agu CM. 2004. Growth and yield Responses of Pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima) to Poultry manure Applications and Staking techniques in Southeastern Nigeria. J Sustain Agric. 24(2):5–10. doi: 10.1300/J064v24n02_03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [AOAC] Official Journal of the European Communities N° L 344/36 of 26.11.92. 2005. Determination ofcrude fibre/ AOAC, 962.09ue.
   Google Scholar
• APEDA. 2018. List of accredited certification bodies under NPOP. Agricultural and processed food products export development authority. Accessed 28th April 2018. Available from: https://apeda.gov.in/apedawebsite/organic/NPOP_certification_bodies.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bray RH, Kurtz LT. 1945. Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 59(1):39–45. doi: 10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran WG, Cox GM. 1958. Experimental designs. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Corre WJ. 1983. Growth and morphogenesis of sun and shade plants. II. The influence of light quality. Acta Bot Neerl. 32(3):185–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1983.tb01700.x.
   Google Scholar
• Crandall PC. 1980. Twenty years of red raspberry research in southwestern Washington state. Acta Hortic. 112(112):53–58. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1980.112.7.
   Google Scholar
• Dai Y, Shen Z, Liua Y, Wang L, Hannaway D, Lu H. 2009. Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence, and chlorophyll content of tetrastigma hemsleyanum diels et gilg. Environ Exp Bot. 65(2–3):177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies BH. 1976. Carotenoids. In: Goodwin TW, editor Chemistry and biochemistry of plant pigments. London, New York, San Francisco: Academic Press; pp. 38–165.
   Google Scholar
• Feng F, Li M, Ma F, Cheng L. 2014. Effects of location within the tree canopy on carbohydrates, organic acids, amino acids and phenolic compounds in the fruit peel and flesh from three apple (malus × domestica) cultivars. Hortic Res. 1(1):14019. doi: 10.1038/hortres.2014.19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher SRA, Yates F. 1963. Statistical tables for biology, agricultural and medical research. 6th ed. London: Oliver and Boyd. Edinburgh Tweedale Court.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; p. 680.
   Google Scholar
• Goulart BL, Demchak K. 1993. Physiological responses of “T”, “V” and hedgerow trained red and black raspberries (Rubus idaeus L. and R. occidentalis L.). Acta Hortic. 352(352):159–168. doi: 10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.1993.352.22.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna YH, Edling RJ, Adams AJ. 1989. Double-cropping cucumber and tomatoes to minimise the cost of staking cucumber. Hort Sci. 102:326–328.
   Google Scholar
• Heuvel JEV, Sullivan JA, Proctor JTA. 2000. Trellising system and cane density affect yield and fruit quality of red raspberry. Hortsci. 35(7):1215–1219. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.35.7.1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilli JS, Vyakarnahal BS, Biradar DP, Hunje R. 2007. Influence of method of trailing and fertilizer levels on seed yield of ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula L Roxb). Karnataka J Agric Sci. 22(1):47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hilli JS, Vyakarnahal BS, Biradar DP, Hunje R. 2009. Influence of method of trailing and fertilizer levels on seed yield of ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula L. Roxb). Karnataka J Agric Sci. 22(1):47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson ML. 1967. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Pretice hall of India Pvt. Ltd. Publisher; p. 497–503.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston S, Loree RE. 1927. Fruit production on various parts of unbranched fruiting canes. In: Pruning the red raspberry. Special Bulletin 162. East Lansing, Mich: Agricultural Experiment Station, Michigan State College of Agriculture and Applied Science; p. 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Karthick K, Patel GS, Shanmugapriya V, Varsat BA. 2017. Performance of ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula L. Roxb.) varieties and nature of cultivation for yield and yield attributes. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 6(3):458–462. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.053.
   Google Scholar
• Kartika JG, Karyana SW. 2017. The use of trellis and mulch increased fruit production of spaghetti squash (Cucurbita pepo L.). J Tropical Crop Sci. 4(3):86–93. doi: 10.29244/jtcs.4.3.86-93.
   Google Scholar
• Khan I, Ameta KD, Kaushik RA, Dubey RB, Singh H, Pareek S, Gupta S. 2017. Response of crop geometry on the performance of parthenocarpic varieties of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under controlled polyhouse condition. Chem Sci Rev Lett. 6(22):1253–1258.
   Google Scholar
• Konsler TR, Strider DL. 1973. The response of cucumber to trellis vs. ground culture. Hort Science. 8(3):220–221. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.8.3.220.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Sharma S, Pathania V. 2013. Effect of shading and plant density on growth, yield and oil composition of clary sage (Salvia sclarea L.) in northwestern Himalaya. J Essent Oil Res. 25(1):23–3. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2012.742467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurhekar P, Sanap PB, Pawar PR, Pawar SS. 2015. Development and evaluation of bamboo trellis system for growing cucurbits. Int J Trop Agric. 33(2) IV:1741–1745.
   Google Scholar
• Léchaudel M, Lopez-Lauri F, Vidal V, Sallanon H, Joas J. 2013. Response of the physiological parameters of mango fruit transpiration, water relations and anti-oxidant system) to its light and temperature environment. J Plant Physiol. 170(6):567–576. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locklin HD. 1932. Effects of different methods of pruning raspberries on earliness, weight of fruit and yield. In: Proc. twenty-seventh annual meeting. Yakima, Wash: Washington State Horticultural Association; pp. 185–189.
   Google Scholar
• Mazumdar BC, Majumder K. 2003. Methods of physio-chemical analysis of fruit. Delhi, India: Daya Publishing House. pp. 112–116.
   Google Scholar
• Mian YA, Rahman MM, Mian MAK, Hossain MM, Islam MS, Islam SM. 2001. Performance of teasle gourd genotypes grown on different trellis. Online J Biol Sci. 1(5):369–371. doi: 10.3923/jbs.2001.369.371.
   Google Scholar
• Nehrbas SR, Pritts MP. 1988. Effect of training system on performance of hand-harvested summer-bearing raspberries. Hort Sci. 23(1):126–127. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.23.1.126.
   Google Scholar
• Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. 1985. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. New: ICAR Publications; pp. Delhi–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pathirana CK, Sajeevika IDC, Pathirana PRS, Fonseka H, Fonseka RM. 2014. Effects of canopy management and fruit thinning on seed quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) variety Thilina. Trop Agric Res. 25(2):171–179. doi: 10.4038/tar.v25i2.8139.
   Google Scholar
• Russo VM, Roberts BW, Schatzer RJ. 1991. Feasibility of trellised cucumber production. Hort Sci. 26(9):1156–1158. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.26.9.1156.
   Google Scholar
• Saha T, Nithya C, Kalmesh M, Ray SN. 2016. Evaluation of trellis system for pest management in bitter gourd. Indian J Hortic. 73(3):383–386. doi: 10.5958/0974-0112.2016.00081.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders RM, Hautala E. 1979. Relationships among crude fiber, neutral detergent fiber, in vitro dietary fiber, and in vivo (rats) dietary fiber in wheat foods. Am J Clin Nutr. 32(6):1188–1191. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/32.6.1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma RK, Tomar BS, Singh SP, Kumar A. 2016. Effect of growing methods on seed yield and quality in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria). Indian J Agric Sci. 86(3):93–98. doi: 10.56093/ijas.v86i3.57018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart RE, Shaulis NJ, Lemon ER. 1982. The effect of concord vineyard microclimate on yield. I. The effects of pruning, training, and shoot positioning on radiation microclimate. Am J Enol Vitic. 33(2):99–102. doi: 10.5344/ajev.1982.33.2.99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solymosi K, Schoefs B. 2010. Etioplast and etio-chloroplast formation under natural conditions: the dark side of chlorophyll biosynthesis. Phytosynth Res. 105(2):143–166. doi: 10.1007/s11120-010-9568-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaiah BV, Asija GL. 1956. A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci. 25:259–260.
   Google Scholar
• Swingle HD, Mullins CA. 1976. Evaluation of fresh market cucumber varieties for trellis production. Tenn Farm Home Sci. 100:22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor BK, Leamon KC. 1991. Trellis effects on yield and fruit quality of five table grape varieties in the Murray valley [victoria]. Aust J Exp Agric. 31(4):585–589. doi: 10.1071/EA9910585.
   Google Scholar
• Todd GW, Bean RC, Betty P. 1960. Photosynthesis and respiration in developing fruits. II. Comparative rates at various stages of development. Plant Physiol. 36(1):69–73. doi: 10.1104/pp.36.1.69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkley A, Black JA. 1934. An experimentation of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of chronic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37(1):27–28. doi: 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.
   Google Scholar
• Watson DJ. 1947. Comparative physiological studies in the growth of field crops. I: variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. Ann Bot. 11(1):41–76. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083148.
   Google Scholar
• Witham FH, Blaydes BF, Devlin RM. 1971. Experiments in plant physiology, Van nostrand reinhold. New York, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. pp. 167–200.
   Google Scholar
• Xiaohua Q, Qianqian L, Xiaotian M, Chunlu Q, Huihui W, Nannan R, Chenxi S, Shumiao H, Xuewen X, Xuehao C. 2019. Sugar enhances water logging-induced adventitious root formation in cucumber by promoting auxin transport and signalling. Plant, Cell & Environ. 43(6):1545–1557. doi: 10.1111/pce.13738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue W, Shu-Chai S, Lv-Yi M, Shao-Yan Y, Yu-Wei W, Xiang-Nan W. 2018. Effects of canopy microclimate on fruit yield and quality of Camellia oleifera. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 235:132–141. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2017.12.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar