Utilisation of press mud for organic cultivation of Andrographis paniculata Wall. ex Nees in reclaimed sodic soil

References

• Arnon DI. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 24(1):1–15. doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassi D, Menossi M, Mattiello L. 2018. Nitrogen supply influences photosynthesis establishment along the sugarcane leaf. Sci Rep. 8(1):2327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20653-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blake GR, Hartge KH. 1986. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 physical and Mineralogical 1986. Am Soc Agron Monogr. 9(1):331–381. doi: 10.1002/gea.3340050110.
   Google Scholar
• Bouyoucos GJ. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agron J. 54(5):464465. doi: 10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caceres DD, Hancke JL, Burgos RA, Wikman GK. 1997. Prevention of common colds with Andrographis paniculata dried extract, a pilot double blind trial. Phytomedicine. 4(2):101–104. doi: 10.1016/S0944-7113(97)80051-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casida LE, Klein DA, Santoro T. 1964. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci. 98(6):371–376. doi: 10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra P, Kannujia R, Pandey R, Shukla S, Bahadur L, Pal M, Kumar B. 2016. Rapid quantitative analysis of multi-components in Andrographis paniculata using UPLC-QqQLIT-MS/MS: Application to soil sodicity and organic farming. Ind Crops Prod. 83:423–430. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang EH, Chung RS, Tsai YH. 2007. Effect of different application rates of organic fertilizer on soil enzyme activity and microbial population. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 53:132–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00122.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao WW, Kuo YH, Hsieh SL, Lin BF 2011. Inhibitory effects of ethyl acetate extract of Andrographis paniculata on NF-κB trans-activation activity and LPS-induced acute inflammation in mice. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 254531. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nep120.
   Google Scholar
• Chattha MU, Hassan MU, Barbanti L, Chattha MB, Khan I, Usman M, Ali A, Nawaz M. 2019. Composted sugarcane by-product press mud cake supports wheat growth and improves soil properties. Int J Plant Prod. 13(3):241–249. doi: 10.1007/s42106-019-00051-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai L, Wang L, Pan W. 2017. Andrographolide inhibits proliferation and metastasis of SGC7901 gastric cancer cells. BioMed Res Int. 6242103. doi: 10.1155/2017/6242103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang YP, Verma KS. 1996. Direct and residual effect of pressmud cakes in rice-wheat cropping system. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 44(3):448–450.
   Google Scholar
• Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA. 1977. Phosphatases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 9:167–172. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(77)90070-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA. 1988. Glucosidases and galactosidases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 20(5):601–606. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(88)90141-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2011. FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Info-faostatatfao.org.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta RK, Ladha JK, Bains JS, Singh J, Bains JS, Singh J. 2008. Evaluation of press mud cake as a source of nitrogen and phosphorus for rice–wheat cropping system in the Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Biol Fertil Soils. 44(5):755–762. doi: 10.1007/s00374-007-0258-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanway JJ, Heidel H. 1952. Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa state college, soil Testing Laboratory. Iowa Agriculture. 54:1–31. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201300490113.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson ML. 1973. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall India Pvt. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Jamil M, Qasim M, Zia MS. 2008. Utilization of pressmud as organic amendment to improve physico-chemical characteristics of calcareous soil under two legume crops. J Chem Soc Pak. 30(4):577–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan J, Prasanthrajan M. 2008. Recycling of industrial solid waste, pressmud as a manure. Agric Sci Dig. 28(3):192–194. https://arccjournals.com/journal/agricultural-science-digest/ARCC2581.
   Google Scholar
• Keen BA, Rackowski H. 1921. The relation between the clay content of certain physical properties of a soil. J Agric Sci. 11(4):441–449. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600004469.
   Google Scholar
• Khan ZI, Kashaf S, Ahmad K, Shaheen M, Younis S, Arshad F. 2013. Impact of use of press mud as fertilizer on the concentration of copper and nickel in the soil and livestock oat fodder. Pak J Zool. 45(5):1221–1227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopsell DA, Kopsell DE, Curran‐Celentano J. 2007. Carotenoid pigments in kale are influenced by nitrogen concentration and form. J Sci Food Agric. 87(5):900–907. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korai PK, Memon KS, Pan G, Rajper AA, Jamro GM, Korai SK, Jarwar AD. 2014. Effect of sugarcane pressmud biocompost on dry matter yield and nutrient uptake in maize. J Biol Agric Healthc. 4(23):142-146.zsp.com.pk/pdf45/1221–1227.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Meena RS, Jinger D, Jatav HS, Banjara T. 2017. Use of pressmud compost for improving crop productivity and soil health. Int J Chem Stud. 5(2):384–389.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd JN, Butler JHA. 1972. Short-term assays of soil proteolytic enzyme activities using proteins and dipeptide derivatives as substrates. Soil Biol Biochem. 4(1):19–30. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(72)90038-7.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler HK. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Meth Enzymol. 148:350–382. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 42(3):421–428. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani AK, Santhi R, Sellamuthu KM. 2007. A Hand book of Laboratory analysis, a E Publications, no. 10, Sundaram St-1. Coimbatore. 641041.
   Google Scholar
• Martin JP. 1950. Use of acid, rose Bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for Estimating soil fungi. Soil Sci. 69(3):215–232. doi: 10.1097/00010694-195003000-00006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narwal RP, Antil RS, Pal D, Gupta AP. 1993. Improving nitrogen status in pressmud amended soils. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 41(3):577–579.
   Google Scholar
• Nasir NM. 2006. Better management practices for cotton and sugarcane. Pakistan, Ferozepur Road, Lahore: WWF; p. 54600.
   Google Scholar
• Pagaria P, Totawat KL. 2007. Effects of pressmud and spentwash in integration with phosphogypsum on metallic cations build-up in the calcareous sodic soil. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 55(1):52–57.
   Google Scholar
• Panche AN, Diwan AD, Chandra SR. 2016. Flavonoids: an overview. J Nutr Sci. 5:1–15. doi: 10.1017/jns.2016.41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson D, Gray TRG, Williams ST. 1971. Methods for studying the ecology of soil microorganisms. In: IBP Handb. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing; p. 116.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash M, Karmegam N. 2010. Vermistabilization of pressmud using Perionyx ceylanensis. Mich Bioresour Technol. 101(21):8464–8468. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prsa I, Stampar F, Vodnik D, Veberic R. 2007. Influence of nitrogen on leaf chlorophyll content and photosynthesis of ‘Golden Delicious’ apple. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci. 57(3):283–289. doi: 10.1080/09064710600982878.
   Google Scholar
• Raimondi IM, Rodrigues VGS, Lima JZ, Marques JP, Vaz LAA. 2020. The potential use of pressmud as reactive material for Cd2+removal: adsorption equilibrium, kinetics, desorption, and bioaccessibility. Water Air Soil Pollut. 231(7):1–20. doi: 10.1007/s11270-020-04746-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajput A, Memon M, Memon KS, Tunio S, Sial AT, Khan MA. 2017. Nutrient composition of banana fruit as affected by farm manure, Composted pressmud and mineral fertilizers. Pak J Bot. 49(1):101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh G, Shivanna MB, Ram AS. 2011. Interactive influence of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on growth and yield of kalmegh (Andrographis paniculata Nees.). Int Res J Plant Sci. 2:16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Rayudu ES, Srimurali M, Venkaiah K. 2014. Application of pressmud for improvement in physical properties of alkaline soils. Int J Eng Manag Res. 4(2):223–227.
   Google Scholar
• Rengasamy P, Churchman GJ. 1999. Cation exchange capacity, exchangeable cations and sodicity. In: KI Peverill L, editor. ‘Soil Analysis an Interpretation Manual’. Melbourne: Sparrow and DJ Reuter). CSIRO; p. 147–157.
   Google Scholar
• Sabir M, Hanafi MM, Aziz T, Ahmad HR, Zia-Ur-Rehman M, Saifullah GM, Hakeem KR. 2013. Comparative effect of activated carbon, pressmud and poultry manure on immobilization and concentration of metals in maize (Zea mays) grown on contaminated soil. Int J Agric Biol. 15:559–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanjutha S, Subramanian S, Rani CI, Maheswari J. 2008. Integrated nutrient management in Andrographis paniculata. Res J Agric Biol Sci. 4(2):141–145.
   Google Scholar
• Sarwar G, Tahir MA, Muhammad S. 2018. Evaluation of dewaxed filter cake press mud for p-release from indigenous rock phosphate and its utilization by maize. Pak J Agric Sci. 55(2):361–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddhartha S, Archana M, Jinu J, Pradeep M. 2009. Anthelmintic potential of Andrographis paniculata. Cajanus Cajan And Silybum Marianum. Pharmacog J. 1(4):243–245.
   Google Scholar
• Singh P, Singh H. 2010. Nitrogen mineralization of pressmud in sub-tropical riparian zone of Punjab. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 58(4):455–459.
   Google Scholar
• Singh P, Singh H, Bahl GS. 2010. Phosphorus supplying capacity of pressmud-amended recent floodplain soils under different moisture regimes. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 58(2):168–181.
   Google Scholar
• Singh Y, Singh B, Gupta RK, Ladha JK, Bains JS, Singh J. 2008. Evaluation of press mud cake as a source of nitrogen and phosphorus for rice-wheat cropping system in the Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Biol Fert Soils. 44(5):755–762. doi: 10.1007/s00374-007-0258-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh H, Singh Y, Vashist KK. 2005. Evaluation of pressmud cake as source of phosphorus for rice-wheat rotation. J Sustain Agric. 26(4):5–21. doi: 10.1300/J064v26n04_03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbiah BV, Asija GL. 1956. A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soil. Curr Sci. 25:259–260.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai MA. 1994. Soil enzymes, methods of soil analysis, Part-2, Microbiological and biochemical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am Book Ser. 5:775–833. doi: 10.2136/sssabookser5.2.c37.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. 1969. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem. 1(4):301–307. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. 1972. Assay of urease activity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 4(4):479–487. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(72)90064-8.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari RJ, Bangar KS, Nema GK, Sharma RK. 1998. Long-term effect of pressmud and nitrogenous fertilizers on sugarcane and sugar yield on a Typic Chromustert. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 46(2):243–245.
   Google Scholar
• Walkley A, Black IA. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37(1):29–38. doi: 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe FS, Olsen SR. 1965. Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 29(6):677–678. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1965.03615995002900060025x.
   Google Scholar
• Wiart C, Kumar K, Yusof MY, Hamimah H, Fauzi ZM, Sulaiman M. 2005. Antiviral properties of ent‐labdene diterpenes of Andrographis paniculatanees, inhibitors of herpes simplex virus type 1. Phytother Res. 19(12):1069–1070. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widyawaruyantia A, Asrorya M, Ekasaria W, Setiawana D, Radjarama A, Tumewu L, Afid AF. 2014. In vivo antimalarial activity of Andrographis paniculata tablets, international seminar on natural product medicines, ISNPM 2012. Procedia Chem. 13:101–104. doi: 10.1016/j.proche.2014.12.012.
   Google Scholar
• Williams CH, Steinberg A. 1959. Soil sulphur fractions as chemical indices of available sulphur in some Australian soils. Aust J Agric Res. 10(3):340–352. doi: 10.1071/AR9590340.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Marshall RL, Mukkur TK. 2006. An investigation on the antimicrobial activity of Andrographis paniculata extracts and andrographolide in vitro. Asian J Plant Sci. 5(3):527–530. doi: 10.3923/ajps.2006.527.530.
   Google Scholar
• Yaduvanshi NPS, Yadav DV. 1990. Effects of sulphitation press mud and nitrogen fertilizer on biomass, nitrogen economy and plant composition in sugarcane and on soil chemical properties. J Agric Sci. 114(3):259–263. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600072646.
   Google Scholar
• Yaduvanshi NPS, Yadav DV. 1996. Residual effect of press mud cake with nitrogen on cane yield, juice quality and soil nitrogen in sugarcane ratoon. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 44(1):158–160.
   Google Scholar
• Yang SD, Liu JX, Wu J, Tan HW, Li YR. 2013. Effects of vinasse and press mud application on the biological properties of soils and productivity of sugarcane. Sugar Tech. 15(2):152–158. doi: 10.1007/s12355-012-0200-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar