EFFECTS OF CRYOPRESERVATION ON PENETRATION ABILITY OF HUMAN SPERMATOZOA INTO BOVINE CERVICAL MUCUS

References

• Aitken RJ, Best FSM, Richardson, DW, Schats R, Simm G (1983): Influence of caffeine on move-ment characteristics, fertilizing capacity, and ability to penetrate cervical mucus of human spermato-zoa. J Reprod Fert 67:19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alexander NJ (1977): Surface structure of spermatozoa frozen for artificial insemination. Andrologia 9:155–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alexander N (1981): Evaluation of male infertility with an in vitro cervical mucus penetration test. Fertil Steril 36:201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno LE, Bernal SA, Frey GW, Rossard P, Arzumendi G, Von Frey GW (1987): Investigations on bovine sperm abnormalities before and after migration in fresh bovine cervical mucus and in a culture medium. J Vet Med 34:782–789.
   Google Scholar
• Centola GM, Raubertas RF, Mattox JH (1992): Cryopreservation of human sperm: comparison of cryopreservatives, sources of variability, and prediction of post thaw survival. J Androl 13:283–289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Centola GM, Mattox JH, Burde S, Leary JF (1990): Assessment of the viability and acrosome status of fresh and frozen-thawed human spermatozoa using single wavelength fluorescence microscopy. Molecular Reproduction and Development 27:130–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Centola GM (1989): Effect of cryopreservation on human sperm motility. Mol Androl 1:399–412.
   Google Scholar
• Drobnis EZ, Zhong CQ, Overstreet JW (1997): Separation of cryopreserved human semen using Sephadex columns, washing, or Percoll gradients. J Androl 12:201–207.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring WG (1987): Bovine cervical mucus penetration test and routine semen analysis of fresh and cryopreserved human spermatozoa. Andrologia 19:544–550.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammitt DG, Bedia E, Rogers P, Syrop CH, Donavan IF, Williamson RA (1989): Comparison of motility stimulants for cryopreserved human semen. Fertil Steril 52:495–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauannet P, Czyglik F, David G (1981): Study of a group of 484 fertile men, I: distribution of semen characteristics. Int J Androl 4:440.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz DF, Overstreet JW, Hanson FW (1980): A new quantitative test for sperm penetration into cervical mucus. Fertil Steril 33:179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keel BA, Kelly W, Webster BW, Zumbach KL, Roberts DK (1987): Application of bovine cervical mucus penetration test. Arch Androl 19:33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshburn PB, Dodson WC, Haney AF (1989): Bovine cervical mucus penetration by human sper-matozoa: lack of association with conception. Arch Androl 22:29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neiderburger CS, Lipshultz LI, Lamb DJ, Glinz M, Scully NF (1993a): Tests of sperm function for evaluation of the male fertility. Fertil Steril 60:319–323.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahadevan M, Trounson AO (1983): Effects of cryopreservation media and dilution methods on preservation of human spermatozoa. Andrologia 15:355–366.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neiderburger CS, Lipshultz LI, Lamb DJ (1993): A neural network to analyze fertility data. Fertil Steril 60:324–330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Penelope GR, Richard JB, Wylie IL (1980): Sperm penetration into cervical mucus in vitro, II: human spermatozoa in bovine mucus. Fertil Steril 33:644–648.
   Google Scholar
• Penelope GR, Richard JB, Wylie IL (1980): Sperm penetration into cervical mucus in vitro, I: com-parative studies. Fertil Steril 33:636–642.
   Google Scholar
• Ritcher MA, Haning RV, Shapiro SS (1984): Artificial donor insemination: fresh versus frozen se-men: the patient as her own control. Fertil Steril 41:277–280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schutte B (1989): New diagnostic procedures in assessing male fertility. Z-Hautker 64:292, 295–298, 301.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini PC, Hauser D, Moyer D, Marrs RP (1986): Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa: corre-lation of ultra structural sperm head configuration with sperm motility and ability to penetrate zona-free hamster ova. Fertil Steril 46:691–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AU (1963): Biological Effects of Freezing and Super Cooling. London: Edward Arnold, p 8.
   Google Scholar
• Smith KD, Rodriguez-Rigau LJ, Steinberger E (1977): Relation between indices of semen analysis and pregnancy rate in infertile couples. Fertil Steril 28:1314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpf PG, Lloyd T (1985): In vitro penetration of human sperm into bovine cervical mucus: effects of sperm washing and exposure to low temperature. Obstet Gynecol 65:42–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, PJ, Wilson J, Laycock R, Weger JA (1982): A comparison of freezing and thawing methods for cryopreservation of human semen. Fertil Steril 37:100–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong AWY, Ho PC, Kwan M, Na HK (1989): Factors affecting the success of artificial insemination by frozen donor semen. Int J Fertil 34:25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1992): WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm—Cervical Mucus Interaction, 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yogev L, Gamzu R, Paz G, Kleiman A, Botchan A, Hauser R, Lessing JB, Yavetz H (1999): Improve-ment in the cervical mucus penetration test by using standard sperm control. Arch Androl 43:253–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelder KT (1990): I.V.F. Laboratory Procedures—Bourn Hallam Group. London, England: Broadwater Press Ltd., pp 39–40.
   Google Scholar