Making up circular consumers: young adults’ personal accounting and counter earmarking within a circular deposit-refund scheme

References

• Ashenmiller, B. (2011). The effect of bottle laws on income: New empirical results. American Economic Review, 101(3), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, W. E. (1987). What is money? A social structural interpretation. In M. S. Mizruchi & M. Schwartz (Eds.), Intercorporate relations: The structural analysis of business (pp. 109–145). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barford, A., & Ahmad, S. R. (2021). A call for a socially restorative circular economy: Waste pickers in the recycled plastics supply chain. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1(2), 761–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00056-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bari, Q. H., Hassan, K. M., & Haque, M. E. (2012). Solid waste recycling in Rajshahi city of Bangladesh. Waste Management, 32(11), 2029–2036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bay, C. (2011). Framing financial responsibility: An analysis of the limitations of accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(6), 593–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2011.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Bay, C. (2018). Makeover accounting: Investigating the meaning-making practices of financial accounts. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 64, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho-Otero, J., Boks, C., & Pettersen, I. N. (2018). Consumption in the circular economy: A literature review. Sustainability, 10(8), 2758. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, A. E. (2001). Recycling norms. California Law Review, 89(5), 1231–1300. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnegie, G. D., & Walker, S. P. (2007). Household accounting in Australia: Prescription and practice from the 1820s to the 1960s. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(1), 41–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710731209
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, B. G., & Espeland, W. N. (1991). Accounting for rationality: Double-entry bookkeeping and the rhetoric of economic rationality. American Journal of Sociology, 97(1), 31–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/229739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheema, A., & Soman, D. (2006). Malleable mental accounting: The effect of flexibility on the justification of attractive spending and consumption decisions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corvellec, H., Stowell, A. F., & Johansson, N. (2021). Critiques of the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13187, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, G. (1965). Primitive money. American Anthropologist, 67(1), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1965.67.1.02a00040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Villiers, C., Farooq, M. B., & Molinari, M. (2021). Qualitative research interviews using online video technology – Challenges and opportunities. Meditari Accountancy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, N. (2005). Reinventing monies in Europe. Economy and Society, 34(4), 558–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140500277096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1967). Primitive rationing: A study in controlled exchange. In R. Firth (Ed.), Themes in economic anthropology (p. 292). Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). A European strategy for plastics. European Comission.
   Google Scholar
• Friedel, R. (2014). American bottles: The road to no return. Environmental History, 19(3), 505–527. https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/emu061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., Soleimani, H., & Kannan, D. (2015). Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3), 603–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowan, T. (1997). American untouchables: Homeless scavengers in San Francisco’s underground economy. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 17(3/4), 159–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb013304
   Google Scholar
• Gutberlet, J., Carenzo, S., Kain, J.-H., & Mantovani Martiniano de Azevedo, A. (2017). Waste picker organizations and their contribution to the circular economy: Two case studies from a global south perspective. Resources, 6(4), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources6040052
   Google Scholar
• Halawa, M., & Olcoń-Kubicka, M. (2018). Digital householding: Calculating and moralizing domestic life through homemade spreadsheets. Journal of Cultural Economy, 11(6), 514–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2018.1486728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hänninen, S. (1995). Accountability lost?: An environmental struggle over the economic feasibility of incineration. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)E0016-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A., & O’Brien, R. (2021). Earmarking risk: Relational investing and portfolio choice. Social Forces, 99(3), 1086–1112 . https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soaa025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, P. W., & Peterson, R. A. (1992). Mental accounting and categorization. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90006-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman, A. H., Van Der Werff, B. R., Henning, J. B., & Watrous-Rodriguez, K. (2014). When do recycling attitudes predict recycling? An investigation of self-reported versus observed behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knickmeyer, D. (2020). Social factors influencing household waste separation: A literature review on good practices to improve the recycling performance of urban areas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1984). The values of quantification. The Sociological Review, 32(1), 88–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00108.x
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, H., Bulkeley, H., & Liverman, D. (2009). Carbon offsetting: Sustaining consumption? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(10), 2357–2379. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitre-Ekern, E., & Dalhammar, C. (2019). Towards a hierarchy of consumption behaviour in the circular economy. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 26(3), 394–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X19840943
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. (2008). Calculating economic life. Journal of Cultural Economy, 1(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350801913643
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (1990). Making accountancy practical. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(5), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(90)90029-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (1993). Accounting expertise and the politics of the product: Economic citizenship and modes of corporate governance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(2–3), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90033-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Power, M. (2013). Accounting, organizing, and economizing: Connecting accounting research and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 557–605. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.783668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149000000001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. (2017). Sweden cooperating with Bulgaria and Romania concerning vulnerable EU citizens. https://www.government.se/government-policy/social-services-including-care-for-older-people/sweden-cooperating-with-bulgaria-and-romania-concerning-vulnerable-eu-citizens/
   Google Scholar
• Moore, W. K., & Scott, D. L. (1983). Beverage container deposit laws: A survey of the issues and results. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 17(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1983.tb00292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlbacher, S., & Kirchler, E. (2019). Individual differences in mental accounting. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2866. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugge, R., Jockin, B., & Bocken, N. (2017). How to sell refurbished smartphones? An investigation of different customer groups and appropriate incentives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylan, J., Holmes, H., & Paddock, J. (2016). Re-introducing consumption to the “circular economy”: A sociotechnical analysis of domestic food provisioning. Sustainability, 8(8), 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naturvårdsverket. (2019). Fakta om avfall. Retrieved from: https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Sa-mar-miljon/Mark/Avfall/
   Google Scholar
• Nemat, B., Razzaghi, M., Bolton, K., & Rousta, K. (2019). The role of food packaging design in consumer recycling behavior – A literature review. Sustainability, 11(16), 4350. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northcott, D., & Doolin, B. (2000). Home accountants: Exploring their practices. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(4), 475–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570010338267
   Google Scholar
• Ojala, M. (2008). Recycling and ambivalence: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of household recycling among young adults. Environment and Behavior, 40(6), 777–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507308787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östlin, J., Sundin, E., & Björkman, M. (2008). Importance of closed-loop supply chain relationships for product remanufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Returpack. (2019). Beteenden och attityder kring pantning. KANTAR SIFO.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., & Miller, P. (2010). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 61, 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01247.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijtsema, S. J., Snoek, H. M., van Haaster-de Winter, M. A., & Dagevos, H. (2020). Let’s talk about circular economy: A qualitative exploration of consumer perceptions. Sustainability, 12(1), 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P., & Giacosa, E. (2019). Cognitive biases of consumers as barriers in transition towards circular economy. Management Decision, 57(4), 921–936. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2018-0951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G. M., Persson, L. M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., & Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenlund, N., & Näslund, J. (2020). Privatekonomi i gymnasieskolan: En undersökning om ungdomars attityder till sin undervisning i privatekonomi och hur lärare uppger att de strukturerar sin undervisning i privatekonomi. Mittuniversitetet.
   Google Scholar
• Sveriges Riksbank. (2019). Så betalar svenskarna 2019. https://www.riksbank.se/sv/betalningar–kontanter/sa-betalar-svenskarna/sa-betalar-svenskarna-2019/betalningsmarknaden-digitaliseras/kontanter-anvands-alltmer-sallan/varfor-slutar-vi-anvanda-kontanter/
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199909)12:3<183::AID-BDM318>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. (2008). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 27(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C., & Sharp, V. (2013). Understanding the normalisation of recycling behaviour and its implications for other pro-environmental behaviours: A review of social norms and recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 79, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tojo, N. (2011). Deposit refund systems in Sweden. IIIEE Reports, 5, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Valfort, M.-A. (2020). Over the rainbow: The road to LGBTI inclusion. How does Sweden compare?
   Google Scholar
• Viscusi, W. K., Huber, J., Bell, J., Viscusi, B. W. K., Huber, J., & Bell, J. (2011). Promoting recycling: Private values, social norms, and economic incentives. American Economic Review, 101(3), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, S. P. (1998). How to secure your husband’s esteem. Accounting and private patriarchy in the British middle class household during the nineteenth century. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(5–6), 485–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00025-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, S. P., & Carnegie, G. D. (2007). Budgetary earmarking and the control of the extravagant woman in Australia, 1850–1920. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18(2), 233–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2005.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S. P., & Llewellyn, S. (2000). Accounting at home: Some interdisciplinary perspectives. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(4), 425–449. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579910270129a
   Google Scholar
• Wastling, T., Charnley, F., & Moreno, M. (2018). Design for circular behaviour: Considering users in a circular economy. Sustainability, 10(6), 1743. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wherry, F. F. (2016). Relational accounting: A cultural approach. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 4(2), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1057/ajcs.2016.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelizer, V. A. (1989). The social meaning of money: “Special monies”. Readings in Economic Sociology, 95(2), 315–330.
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, V. A. (1994). The social meaning of money. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, V. A. (1996). Payments and social ties. Sociological Forum, 11(3), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelizer, V. A. (1998). The proliferation of social currencies. The Sociological Review, 46(1_suppl), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1998.tb03469.x
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, V. A. (2004). Circuits of commerce. In C. Williams (Ed.), Self, social structure, and beliefs: Explorations in sociology (pp. 122–144). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, G., Gu, Y., Wu, Y., Gong, Y., Mu, X., & Han, H. (2020). A systematic review of the deposit-refund system for beverage packaging: Operating mode, key parameter and development trend. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar