Introduction to the special issue on new approaches to figurative language research

References

• Bambini, V., Ranieri, G., Bischetti, L., Scalingi, B., Bertini, C., Ricci, I., Schaeken, W., & Canal, P. (this issue). The costs of multimodal metaphors: Comparing ERPs to figurative expressions in verbal and verbo-pictorial formats. Discourse Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2023.2282895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16(4), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabry, R. E. (2021). Getting it: A predictive processing approach to irony comprehension. Synthese, 198(7), 6455–6489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02470-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. (this issue). Commentary on the Special Issue: New approaches to figurative language research. Discourse Processes.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filik, R. (2023). Emotional responses to sarcasm. In R. W. Gibbs Jr & H. L. Colston (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of irony and thought (pp. 255–271). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., Lima, S. D., & Carroll, P. J. (1984). Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading. Memory & Cognition, 12(6), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, A. (this issue). A selective view of the last fifty years of the experimental psycholinguistics of idiom, metaphor and irony: A Commentary. Discourse Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2024.2319898
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2018). Developing conceptual understanding of sarcasm in L2 English through explicit instruction. Language Teaching Research, 22(2), 208–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816675521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2008). The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1103–1121. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlemore, J., Chen, P. T., Koester, A., & Barnden, J. (2011). Difficulties in metaphors comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 408–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olkoniemi, H., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2021). Processing of irony in text: A systematic review of eye-tracking studies. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 75(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olkoniemi, H., Mézière, D., & Kaakinen, J. K. (this issue). Comprehending irony in text: Evidence from scanpaths. Discourse Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2023.2266964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senaldi, M., & Titone, D. (this issue). Idiom meaning selection following a prior context: Eye movement evidence of L1 direct retrieval and L2 compositional assembly. Discourse Processes.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Malsburg, T., & Vasishth, S. (2013). Scanpaths reveal syntactic underspecification and reanalysis strategies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(10), 1545–1578. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.728232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, N., & Filik, R. (2023). Individual differences in sarcasm interpretation and use: Evidence from the UK and China. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(3), 445–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, N., & Filik, R. (this issue). The role of social status in sarcasm interpretation: Evidence from the United Kingdom and China. Discourse Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2023.2252695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar