Commentary on the special issue: new approaches to figurative language research

References

• Bailey, P. E., Henry, J. D., & Von Hippel, W. (2008). Empathy and social functioning in late adulthood. Aging and Mental Health, 12(4), 499–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860802224243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambini, V., Canal, P., Resta, D., & Grimaldi, M. (2019). Time course and neurophysiological underpinnings of metaphor in literary context. Discourse Processes, 56(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1401876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barchard, K., Grob, K., & Roe, M. (2017). Is sadness blue? The problem of using figurative language for emotions on psychological tests. Behavioral Research Methods, 49(2), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0713-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkman, L. F., & Syme, S. L. (1979). Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: A nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakemore, S.-J. (2008). The social brain in adolescence. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 9(4), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakemore, S. J., & Mills, K. L. (2014). Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasko, D. G., Kazmerski, V. A., & Dawood, S. S. (2021). Saying what you don’t mean: A cross-cultural study of perceptions of sarcasm. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(2), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breheny, R., Ferguson, H. J., & Katsos, N. (2013a). Taking the epistemic step: Toward a model of on-line access to conversational implicatures. Cognition, 126(3), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breheny, R., Ferguson, H. J., & Katsos, N. (2013b). Investigating the timecourse of accessing conversational implicatures during incremental sentence interpretation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(4), 443–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.649040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L. (2013). “Mind your own esteemed business”: Sarcastic honorifics use and impoliteness in Korean TV dramas. Journal of Politeness Research, 9(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0008
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Some universals in language usage [Originally published as Universals in language usage: politeness phenomenon. In: Goody E. (Ed.), Questions and Politeness: strategies in Social Interaction, CUP, New York, 1978]. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D., & Wichmann, A. (2003). Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10–11), 1545–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Sudhof, M., Jurafsky, D., Leskovec, J., & Potts, C. (2013). A computational approach to politeness with application to social factors. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 250–259. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1306.6078
   Google Scholar
• Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning a social function of irony. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 10(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1001_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumontheil, I., Apperly, I. A., & Blakemore, S. J. (2010). Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Developmental Science, 13(2), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00888.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElShami, T. H. S., Shuaibi, J. A., & Zibin, A. (2023). The function of metaphor modality in memes on jordanian Facebook pages. SAGE Open, 13(1), 215824402311548. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231154848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabry, R. E. (2021). Getting it: A predictive processing approach to irony comprehension. Synthese, 198(7), 6455–6489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02470-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Filik, R., Brightman, E., Gathercole, C., & Leuthold, H. (2017). The emotional impact of verbal irony: Eye-tracking evidence for a two-stage process. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filik, R., Leuthold, H., Wallington, K., & Page, J. (2014). Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, C., Țurcan, A., Howman, H., & Filik, R. (2022). Emoji as a tool to aid the comprehension of written sarcasm: Evidence from younger and older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., & Roberts, S. O. (2017). How language shapes the cultural inheritance of categories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 7900–7907.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2020). Pragmatics always matters: An expanded vision of experimental pragmatics. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1619. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gretenkort, T., & Tylén, K. (2021). The dynamics of politeness: An experimental account. Journal of Pragmatics, 185, 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gucman, M. (2016). The role of individual differences and situational factors in perception of verbal irony. Psychology of Language and Communication, 20(3), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2016-0016
   Google Scholar
• Hill, B., Ide, S., Ikuta, S., Kawasaki, A., & Ogino, T. (1986). Universals of linguistics politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 10, 347–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(86)90006-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (1994). Communication in context: Effects of speaker status on the comprehension of indirect requests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1205–1218. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.20.5.1205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (1997). Yes, but …: Positive politeness in conversation arguments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(2), 222–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970162006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. M. (2019). Politeness. In C. Cummins & N. Katsos (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Semantics and Pragmatics (pp. 511–523). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, L. E., Burke, D. M., Austin, A., & Hulme, E. (1998). Production and perception of verbosity in younger and older adults. Psychology of Aging, 13, 355. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.13.3.355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, T., Li, H., & Hou, Y. (2019). Cultural differences in humor perception, usage, and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, X., Zhou, X. (2015). Impoliteness electrified: ERPs reveal the real time processing of disrespectful reference in Mandarin utterance comprehension, and M. Terkourafi (Ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on im/politeness. AILA applied linguistics series 14 (pp. 239–266). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., Olkoniemi, H., Kinnari, T., & Hyönä, J. (2014). Processing of written irony: An eye movement study. Discourse Processes, 51(4), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.870024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, A. N., & Pexman, P. M. (1997). Interpreting figurative statements: Speaker occupation can change metaphor to irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1201_3
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlen, A. K., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2022). Mental chronometry of speaking in dialogue: Semantic interference turns into facilitation. Cognition, 219, 104962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Matsuki, K., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2018). Contributions of reader-and text-level characteristics to eye-movement patterns during passage reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(11), 1687–1713. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1093–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlemore, J., Chen, P. T., Koester, A., & Barnden, J. (2011). Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first Language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 408–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCready, E. (2019). The semantics and pragmatics of honorification: Register and social meaning (1st) ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mézière, D. C., Yu, L., Reichle, E. D., von der Malsburg, T., & McArthur, G. (2023). Using eye-tracking measures to predict reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(3), 425–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münster, K., & Knoeferle, P. (2018). Extending situated language comprehension (accounts) with speaker and comprehender characteristics: Toward socially situated interpretation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2267. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noveck, I. A., Bianco, M., & Castry, A. (2001). The costs and benefits of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(1–2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2001.9678889
   Google Scholar
• Okamoto, S. (2011). The use and interpretation of addressee honorifics and plain forms in Japanese: Diversity, multiplicity, and ambiguity. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(15), 3673–3688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olkoniemi, H., Bertram, R., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2022). Knowledge is a river and education is like a stairway: An eye movement study on how L2 speakers process metaphors and similes. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(2), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olkoniemi, H., Ranta, H., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2016). Individual differences in the processing of written sarcasm and metaphor: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(3), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peper, J. S., & Dahl, R. E. (2013). Surging hormones: Brain-behavior interactions during Puberty. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412473755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M. (2008). It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00591.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomareda, C., Simkute, A., & Phillips, L. H. (2019). Age-related differences in the ability to decode intentions from non-literal language. Acta Psychologica, 198, 102865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Why do people use figurative language? Psychological Science, 5(3), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00653.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockwell, P., & Theriot, E. (2001). Culture, gender, and gender mix in encoders of sarcasm. Communication Research Reports, 18(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090109384781
   Google Scholar
• Saryazdi, R., Bannon, J., & Chambers, C. G. (2019). Age-related differences in referential production: A multiple-measures study. Psychology and Aging, 34(6), 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saryazdi, R., & Chambers, C. G. (2021). Real-time communicative perspective taking in younger and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47, 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in digital culture. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2021). How reliable are individual differences in eye movements in reading? Journal of Memory and Language, 116, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surtees, A., Apperly, I., & Samson, D. (2016). I’ve got your number: Spontaneous perspective-taking in an interactive task. Cognition, 150, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D., & Filik, R. (2016a). Sarcasm in written communication: Emoticons are efficient markers of intention. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 21(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D., Mackenzie, I. G., Leuthold, H., & Filik, R. (2016b). Emotional responses to irony and emoticons in written language: Evidence from EDA and facial EMG. Psychophysiology, 53(7), 1054–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakalidis, A., Bazzi, M., Cucuringu, M., Basile, P., & McGillivray, B. (2019). Mining the UK web archive for semantic change detection. Proceedings of recent advances in natural language processing, 1212–1221. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.43534
   Google Scholar
• Uskul, A. K., Kirchner-Häusler, A., Vignoles, V. L., Rodriguez-Bailón, R., Castillo, V. A., Cross, S. E., Yalçın, M. G., Harb, C., Husnu, S., Ishii, K., Jin, S., Karamaouna, P., Kafetsios, K., Kateri, E., Matamoros-Lima, J., Liu, D., Miniesy, R., Na, J., Özkan, Z., & Uchida, Y. (2023). Neither eastern nor western: Patterns of independence and interdependence in mediterranean societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(3), 471–495. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bos, W., van Dijk, E., Westenberg, M., Rombouts, S. A., & Crone, E. A. (2011). Changing brains, changing perspectives: The neurocognitive development of reciprocity. Psychological Science, 22(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610391102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnum, M. E., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2010). The origin of cultural differences in cognition: Evidence for the social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R. (2022). The cultural differences between English and Chinese idioms and translation. Proceedings of the 2022 international conference on creative industry and knowledge economy, 610–614. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220404.118
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, E. J., Tessler, M. H., Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C. (2020). Polite speech emerges from competing social goals. Open Mind, 4, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00035
   Google Scholar
• Yu, N., & Jia, D. (2016). Metaphor in culture: LIFE IS A SHOW in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(2), 147–180. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, N., & Filik, R. (2023). Individual differences in sarcasm interpretation and use: Evidence from the UK and China. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(3), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar