Selective View of the Last 50 Years of the Experimental Psycholinguistics of Idiom, Metaphor, and Irony: A Commentary

References

• Al-Azary, H., & Katz, A. N. (2021). Do metaphorical sharks bite? Simulation and abstraction in metaphor processing. Memory & Cognition, 49(3), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01109-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariel, M. (2002). The demise of a unique concept of literal meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(4), 361–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00043-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambini, V., Bott, L., & Schumacher, P. B. (2021). It is not always a matter of time: Addressing the costs of metaphor and metonymy through a speed-accuracy trade-off study. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 75(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasko, D. G., & Connine, C. M. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 295. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.19.2.295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobrow, S. A., & Bell, S. M. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory & Cognition, 1(3), 343–346. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Looking at the brains behind figurative language—A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia, 50(11), 2669–2683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowes, A., & Katz, A. (2011). When sarcasm stings. Discourse Processes, 48(4), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2010.532757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowes, A., & Katz, A. (2015). Metaphor creates intimacy and temporarily enhances theory of mind. Memory & Cognition, 43(6), 953–963. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0508-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgers, C., Van Mulken, M., & Schellens, P. J. (2012). Verbal irony: Differences in usage across written genres. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(3), 290–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12446596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciari, C., & Glucksberg, S. (1991). Understanding idiomatic expressions: The contribution of word meanings. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.), Understanding word and sentence (pp. 217–240). North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61535-6
   Google Scholar
• Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(6), 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90014-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2006). The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. D., & Katz, A. N. (2006). On reversing the topics and vehicles of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. D., & Katz, A. N. (2012). Are there necessary conditions for inducing a sense of sarcastic irony? Discourse Processes, 49(6), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.687863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canal, P., Bischetti, L., Bertini, C., Ricci, I., Lecce, S., & Bambini, V. (2022). N400 differences between physical and mental metaphors: the role of theories of mind. Brain and Cognition, 161, 105879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2022.105879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, T. (1978). Metaphor and the Cultivation of Intimacy. Critical Inquiry, 5(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1086/447969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics (Vol. 6). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning a social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 10(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1001_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diveica, V., Pexman, P. M., & Binney, R. J. (2022). Quantifying social semantics: An inclusive definition of socialness and ratings for 8388 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01810-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dress, M. L., Kreuz, R. J., Link, K. E., & Caucci, G. M. (2008). Regional variation in the use of sarcasm. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07309512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41(1), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(89)90077-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fein, O., Yeari, M., & Giora, R. (2015). On the priority of salience-based interpretations: The case of sarcastic irony. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2015-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filik, R. (2023). Emotional responses to sarcasm. In R. W. Gibbs Jr & H. L. Colston (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of irony and thought (pp. 255–271). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Filik, R., Howman, H., Ralph-Nearman, C., & Giora, R. (2018). The role of defaultness and personality factors in sarcasm interpretation: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(3), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1481258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filik, R., Hunter, C. M., & Leuthold, H. (2015). When language gets emotional: Irony and the embodiment of affect in discourse. Acta psychologica, 156, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filik, R., Ţurcan, A., Ralph-Nearman, C., & Pitiot, A. (2019). What is the difference between irony and sarcasm? an fMRI study. cortex, 115, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. (2008). Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482).
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., Jr, Gibbs, R. W., & Gibbs, J. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., Jr, & Gonzales, G. P. (1985). Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms. Cognition, 20(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90010-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gildea, P., & Glucksberg, S. (1983). On understanding metaphor: The role of context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(5), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90355-9
   Google Scholar
• Giora, R. (1999). On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 919–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00100-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Givoni, S., & Giora, R. (2018). Salience and defaultness. In F. Liedtke & A. Tuchen (Eds.), Handbuch Pragmatik (pp. 207–213). J.B. Metzler.
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., & McGlone, M. S. 2001. Understanding figurative language: From metaphor to idioms. ( no 36). Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M. S., & Manfredi, D. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.2479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holler, J., & Levinson, S. (2019). Multimodal language processing in human communication. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(8), 639–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2015). The theory of event coding (TEC) as embodied-cognition framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1318. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, W. S. (2007). Metaphor and readers’ attributions of intimacy. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, B. T. (2021). Disentangling contextual diversity: Communicative need as a lexical organizer. Psychological Review, 128(3), 525. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacinik, N. A. (2014). Sticking your neck out and burying the hatchet: What idioms reveal about embodied simulation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 689. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, A., Paivio, A., Marschark, M., & Clark, J. (1988). Norms for 204 literary and 260 nonliterary metaphors on 10 psychological dimensions. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 3(4), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0304_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, A. N. (2018). On interpreting statements as metaphor or irony: Contextual heuristics and cognitive consequences. In J. S. Mio & A. N. Katz (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and applications (pp. 1–22). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, A. N. (2020). Producing metaphor (and other forms of non-literal language) in the laboratory. In J. Barden & A. Gargett (Eds.), Producing Figurative Expression: Theoretical, experimental and practical perspectives (pp. 37–54). John Benjamin.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, A. N. (2023). Pictorial Irony and Sarcasm. In R. Gibbs Jr. & H. L. Colston (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of irony and thought (pp. 402–425). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, A. N., & Pexman, P. M. (1997). Interpreting figurative statements: Speaker occupation can change metaphor to irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1201_3
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2000). Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7(2), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(4), 374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.4.374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor.
   Google Scholar
• Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2008). The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1103–1121. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlock, T. (2004). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1389–1400. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlone, M. S., Glucksberg, S., & Cacciari, C. (1994). Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension. Discourse Processes, 17(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539409544865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olkoniemi, H., Halonen, S., Pexman, P. M., & Häikiö, T. (2023). Children’s processing of written irony: An eye-tracking study. Cognition, 238, 105508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olkoniemi, H., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2021). Processing of irony in text: A systematic review of eye-tracking studies. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 75(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olkoniemi, H., Ranta, H., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2016). Individual differences in the processing of written sarcasm and metaphor: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(3), 433. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortony, A. (1975). Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice 1. Educational Theory, 25(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1975.tb00666.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortony, A., Reynolds, R. E., & Arter, J. A. (1978). Metaphor: Theoretical and empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 919. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M. (2008). It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00591.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M., Ferretti, T. R., & Katz, A. N. (2000). Discourse factors that influence online reading of metaphor and irony. Discourse Processes, 29(3), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp2903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M., Muraki, E., Sidhu, D. M., Siakaluk, P. D., & Yap, M. J. (2019). Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body–object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 51(2), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1171-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M., & Olineck, K. M. (2002a). Understanding irony: How do stereotypes cue speaker intent? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(3), 245–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X02021003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M., & Olineck, K. M. (2002b). Does sarcasm always sting? Investigating the impact of ironic insults and ironic compliments. Discourse Processes, 33(3), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3303_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J. N., Al-Azary, H., & Katz, A. N. (2023). Cognitive factors related to metaphor goodness in poetic and non-literary metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 38(2), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.2011285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J. N., & Katz, A. N. (2018). Vector space applications in metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(4), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1549840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Why do people use figurative language? Psychological Science, 5(3), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00653.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1979). Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 92–123). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Senaldi, M. S. G., & Titone, D. A. (2022). Less direct, more analytical: Eye-movement measures of L2 idiom reading. Languages, 7(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020091
   Google Scholar
• Sheikh, N. A., & Titone, D. (2016). The embodiment of emotional words in a second language: An eye-movement study. Cognition and Emotion, 30(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1018144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinjo, M., & Myers, J. L. (1987). The role of context in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(2), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90125-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2008). A deflationary account of metaphors. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 84–105). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.007
   Google Scholar
• Stamenković, D., Ichien, N., & Holyoak, K. J. (2019). Metaphor comprehension: An individual-differences approach. Journal of Memory and Language, 105, 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(5), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90284-6
   Google Scholar
• Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1994). Descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic expressions: Familiarity, compositonality, predictability, and literality. Metaphor and Symbol, 9(4), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0904_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1999). On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1655–1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00008-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titone, D., Lovseth, K., Kasparian, K., & Tiv, M. (2019). Are figurative interpretations of idioms directly retrieved, compositionally built, or both? Evidence from eye movement measures of reading. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 73(4), 216. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiv, M., Kutlu, E., O’Regan, E., & Titone, D. (2022). Bridging people and perspectives: General and language-specific social network structure predict mentalizing across diverse sociolinguistic contexts. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak, M., & Katz, A. N. (2000). On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1467–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00101-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trick, L., & Katz, A. N. (1986). The domain interaction approach to metaphor processing: Relating individual differences and metaphor characteristics. Metaphor and Symbol, 1(3), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0103_3
   Google Scholar
• Țurcan, A., & Filik, R. (2016). An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: The roles of familiarity and context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(12), 1867. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utsumi, A. (2000). Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12), 1777–1806. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00116-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, B. C. (2015). Computational irony: A survey and new perspectives. Artificial Intelligence Review, 43(4), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-012-9392-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, P., & Gentner, D. (2011). Structure-mapping in metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 35(8), 1456–1488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01194.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Nick Reid, J., Katz, A. N., & Li, D. (2021). The embodiment of power as forward/backward movement in Chinese and English speakers. Metaphor and Symbol, 36(3), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1907185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, N., & Filik, R. (2023). Individual differences in sarcasm interpretation and use: Evidence from the UK and China. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(3), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar