The integration of a woman's perspective in hysterectomy decisions

References

• Gambone JC, Reiter RC. Hysterectomy: Improving the patient’s decision-making process. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1997; 40(4):868–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis CE, Groff JY, Herman CJ, et al. Overview of women’s decision making regarding elective hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and hormone replacement therapy. J Wom Health Gender-based Med 2000; 9 (Suppl 2): 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R, et al. Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988–1990. Obstet Gynaecol 1994;83(4):549– 555.
   Google Scholar
• Santow G, Bracher M. Correlates of hysterectomy in Australia. Soc Sci Med. 1992; 34(8):929–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter A, McPherson K, Vessey M. Do British women undergo too many or too few hysterectomies? Soc Sci Med. 1988; 27(9):987–994.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Settnes A, Jorgensen T. Hysterectomy in a Danish cohort. Prevalence, incidence and socio-demographic characteristics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996; 75(3):274–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RD, Clark AJ. A qualitative study of women’s hysterectomy experience. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9 (Suppl 2):S15–S25.
   Google Scholar
• Mingo C, Herman CJ, Jasperse M. stories: ethnic variations in women’s attitudes and experiences of menopause, hysterectomy, and hormone replacement therapy. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9(Suppl 2):S27–S38.
   Google Scholar
• Galavotti C, Richter DL. Talking about hysterectomy: The experiences of women from four cultural groups. J Wom Health Gender-based Med 2000; 9(suppl 2):63–67.
   Google Scholar
• Costa C. da. Hysterectomy. Med J Aust 1992; 157:707–708.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kleiverda G. Hysterectomie vanuit het perspectief van vrouwen. In: Slager E, Gerris JMR, Schoenmaker J, et al. Infertiliteit, gynaecologie en obstetrie anno 1996. Oss: Organon Nederland B.V.; 1996. p 185–194.
   Google Scholar
• Groff JY, Mullen PD, Byrd T, et al. Decision making, beliefs, and attitudes toward hysterectomy: A focus group study with medically underserved women in Texas. J Wom Health Gender-based Med 2000; 9(suppl 2):39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg S, Nordberg E. Surgical rates in Africa: Variations and their possible explanations. Trop Geogr Med 1990 Oct;42(4):352–358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nordberg E, Holmberg S, Kiugu S. Rates of major surgery by age and sex in a rural district in Kenya. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1996; 90(2):213–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu WC, Pearlman RA. Consent in medical decision making: The role of communication. J Gen Int Med 1988; 3:9–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byles JE, Hanrahan PF, Schofield MJ. ‘It would be good to know you’re not alone’: The health care needs of women with menstrual symptoms. Family Practice 1997; 14(3):249–254.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McPherson A, Anderson A. The ‘ectomies’. In: Women’s problems in general practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1983. p 107–115.
   Google Scholar
• Vuorma S, Teperi J, Hurskainen R, et al. Hysterectomy trends in Finland in 1987–1995: A register based analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scan 1998; 77(7):770–776.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rock JA, Thompson JD. Te Linde’s operative gynecology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. pp 774–779.
   Google Scholar
• Sheth SS, Malpani AN. Inappropriate use of new technology: Impact on women’s health. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1997; 58(1):159–165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wijma K, Kauer FM, Janssens J. Indications for, Prevalence and Implications of Hysterectomy: A discussion. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 3:69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Imam Z. Mass hysterectomies in India. Lancet 1994; 343(8897): 592.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling J, Faisst K, Kapetanios E, et al. Appropriateness and necessity research on the Internet: using the ‘‘second opinion system’’. Methods Inf Med 2000;39(3):233–237. The necessity assessment system can be found on the Internet, under http://sos.inf.ethz.ch.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre G, Allaire C, Jeffrey J, et al. SOGC clinical guidelines. Hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002; 24(1):37–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlson KJ, Nichols DH, Schiff I. Indications for hysterectomy. N Engl J Med 1993; 328(12):856–860.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bickell NA, Earp J, Evans AT, et al. A matter of opinion about hysterectomies: Experts’ and practicing community gynaecologists’ ratings of appropriateness. Am J Public Health 1995; 85(8Pt1):1125–1128.
   Google Scholar
• Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, et al. The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy. Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 95(2):199–205.
   Google Scholar
• Peters AAW, van Dorst E, Jellis B, et al. A randomized clinical trial to compare two different approaches in women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77(5):740–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrop-Griffiths J, Katon W, Walker E, et al. The association between chronic pelvic pain, psychiatric diagnosis and childhood sexual abuse. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71:589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker EA, Katon WJ, Hansom J et al. Psychiatric diagnoses and sexual victimization in women with chronic pelvic pain. Psychosomatics 1995; 36(6):531–540.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta U, Ganesh K. Emergency hysterectomy in obstetrics: Review of 15 years. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 20(1):1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamsho MA, Alsakka M. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy in Qatar: A 20-year review. Int J Fertil Womens Med 1999; 44(4):209–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maresh MJ, Metcalfe MA, McPherson K, et al. The VALUE national hysterectomy: Description of the patients and their surgery. BJOG 2002; 109(3):302–312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varol N, Healey M, Tang P, et al. Ten-year review of hysterectomy morbidity and mortality: Can we change direction? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 41(3):295–302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dao B, Toure B, Sano D, et al. Hysterectomies in tropical zones: experience of one African maternal health service. 141 cases in Burkina Faso. Tunis Med. 2001; 79(1):47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Wingo PA, Huezo CM, Rubin GL, et al. The mortality risk associated with hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152 (7 Pt 1): 803–808.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs SR. Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95 (6 Pt 1): 787–793.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield MJ, Bennett A, Redman S, et al. Self-reported longterm outcomes of hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98(11):1129–1136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farquhar CM, Sadler L, Harvey S. A prospective study of the short-term outcomes of hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 42(2):197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dam JH,Gosselink MJ, Drogendijk AC, et al. Changes in bowel function after hysterectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40(11):1342–1347.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riedel HH, Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Semm K. Ovarian failure phenomena after hysterectomy. J Reprod Med 1986; 31(7):597–600.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siddle N, Sarrel P, Whitehead M. The effect of hysterectomy on the age at ovarian failure: Identification of a subgroup of women with premature loss of ovarian function and literature review. Fertil Steril 1987; 47(1):94–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughlin GA, Barrett-Connor E, Kritz-Silverstein D, et al. Hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and endogenous sex hormone levels in older women: The Rancho Bernardo Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85(2):645–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed F, Wasti S. Infectious complications following abdominal hysterectomy in Karachi, Pakistan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001; 73(1):27–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pothinam S, Sirinavasatian P, Lumbiganon P. Febrile and infectious morbidity after abdominal hysterectomy at Srinagarind Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 1992; 75(3):178–183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ranson MK, John KR. Quality of hysterectomy care in rural Gujarat: The role of community-based health insurance. Health Policy Plan 2001; 16(4):395–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farell SA, Kieser K. Sexuality after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95 (6 Pt 2): 1045–1051.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes JC, Kjerulff KH, Langenberg PW, et al. Hysterectomy and sexual functioning. JAMA 1999; 282(20):1934–1941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambden MP, Bellamy G, Ogburn-Russell L, et al. Women’s sense of well-being before and after hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1997; 26(5):540–548.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helstro¨m L, Lundberg PO, et al. Sexuality after hysterectomy: A factor analysis of women’s sexual lives before and after subtotal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Mar; 81 (3):357–362.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saini J, Kuczynski E, Gretz HF, et al. Supracervical hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: perceived effects on sexual function. BMC Womens Health 2002; 2(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Khastgir G, Studd JW, Catalan J. The psychological outcome of hysterectomy. Gynecol Endocrinol 2000; 14(2):132–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathorst-Boos J, von Schoultz B. Psychological reactions and sexual life after hysterectomy with or without oophorectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1992; 34(2):97–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kritz-Silverstein D, Wingard DL, Barrett-Connor E. Hysterectomy status and life satisfaction in older women. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2002; 11(2):181–190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar