Reasons for non-attendance at cervical screening as reported by non-attendees in Sweden

References

• Parkin D M, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 74–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson L, Adami H O. Cytologic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Sweden evaluated by identification and simulation. Br J Cancer 1990; 61: 903–908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigurdsson K. Effect of organized screening on the risk of cervical cancer. Evaluation of screening activity in Iceland, 1964–1991. Int J Cancer 1993; 54: 563–570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom R, Sparen P, Adami H O. Trends in cancer of the cervix uteri in Sweden following cytological screening. Br J Cancer 1999; 81: 159–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlck C G, Jonsson H, Lenner P. Pap smear screening and changes in cervical cancer mortality in Sweden. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1994; 44: 267–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponten J, Adami H O, Bergstrom R, et al. Strategies for global control of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 1995; 60: 1–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson L, Adami H O. Optimization of cervical cancer screening. Cancer Causes Control 1992; 3: 125–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillner J. Cervical cancer screening in Sweden. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36: 2255–2259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaker S, Adami H O, Sparen P. Reasons women do not attend screening for cervical cancer: a population-based study in Sweden. Prev Med 2001; 32: 482–491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlin S S, Uhler R J. Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among Hispanic women in the United States and Puerto Rico, 1998–1999. Prev Med 2002; 34: 242–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray M, McMillan C. Social and behavioural predictors of women's cancer screening practices in Northern Ireland. J Public Health Med 1993; 15: 147–153
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz S J, Hofer T P. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States. Jama 1994; 272: 530–534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoll P M, Narayan K V, Paterson J G. Cervical cancer screening: women's knowledge, attitudes and preferences. Health Bull 1991; 49: 184–190
   Google Scholar
• Segnan N. Socioeconomic status and cancer screening. IARC Sci Publ 1997; 369–376
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orbell S, Crombie I, Robertson A, et al. Assessing the effectiveness of a screening campaign: who is missed by 80% cervical screening coverage?. J R Soc Med 1995; 88: 389–394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters R K, Bear M B, Thomas D. Barriers to screening for cancer of the cervix. Prev Med 1989; 18: 133–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen L P, Olesen F. Women's knowledge of and attitude towards organized cervical smear screening. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 988–996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann J B, Sigurdsson J A, Sigurdsson K. What attendance rate can be achieved for Pap smear screening? A case-control study of the characteristics of non-attenders and results of reminder efforts. Scand J Prim Health Care 1996; 14: 152–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins M M, Gabali C, Winkleby M, et al. Barriers to cervical cancer screening in rural Mexico. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002; 12: 475–479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orbell S, Sheeran P. Health Psychology and Uptake of Preventive Health Services: A review of 30 years' research on cervical screening. Psychology and Health 1993; 8: 417–433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn J A, Chiou V, Allen J D, et al. Beliefs about Papanicolaou smears and compliance with Papanicolaou smear follow-up in adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999; 153: 1046–1054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jubelirer S J, Blanton M F, Blanton P D, et al. Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors relative to cervical cancer and the Pap smear among adolescent girls in West Virginia. J Cancer Educ 1996; 11: 230–232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glasgow R E, Whitlock E P, Valanis B G, et al. Barriers to mammography and Pap smear screening among women who recently had neither, one or both types of screening. Ann Behav Med 2000; 22: 223–228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijma B, Gullberg M, Kjessler B. Attitudes towards pelvic examination in a random sample of Swedish women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 422–428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springs F E, Friedrich W N. Health risk behaviors and medical sequelae of childhood sexual abuse. Mayo Clin Proc 1992; 67: 527–532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner M E, Vogel M E, Garcia-Shelton L M, et al. Self-reported medical problems of adult female survivors of childhood sexual abuse. J Fam Pract 1993; 36: 633–638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffman M H, Bauer H M, Hoover R N, et al. Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 958–964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley M, Golding J M, Minkoff J R. Is a history of trauma associated with a reduced likelihood of cervical cancer screening?. J Fam Pract 2002; 51: 827–831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robohm J S, Buttenheim M. The gynecological care experience of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse: a preliminary investigation. Women Health 1996; 24: 59–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menage J. Women's perception of obstetric and gynecological examinations. BJM 1993; 306: 1127–1128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. Recalling the pain. Nurs Times 1990; 86: 38–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linos A, Riza E. Comparisons of cervical cancer screening programmes in the European Union. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36: 2260–2265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. Gynekologisk cellprovskontroll: förslag till screeningprogram. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm 1998
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim A N. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurementNew ed. Continuum, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Swahnberg K, Wijma B. The NorVold Abuse Questionnaire (NorAQ): validation of new measures of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, and abuse in the health care system among women. Eur J Public Health 2003; 13: 361–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijma B, Schei B, Swahnberg K, et al. Emotional, physical, and sexual abuse in patients visiting gynaecology clinics: a Nordic cross-sectional study. Lancet 2003; 361: 2107–2113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman D G. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Idestrom M, Milsom I, Andersson-Ellstrom A. Knowledge and attitudes about the Pap-smear screening program: a population-based study of women aged 20–59 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81: 962–967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips Z, Avis M, Whynes D K. Knowledge of cervical cancer and screening among women in east-central England. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005; 15: 639–645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong D. The rise of surveillance in medicine. Sociol Health Illn 1995; 17: 393–404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush J. “It's just part of being a woman”: cervical screening, the body and femininity. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50: 429–444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkadi A, Widmark C, Tornberg S, et al. The ‘hows’, ‘whos’, and ‘whens’ of screening: gynaecologists' perspectives on cervical cancer screening in urban Sweden. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 1097–1108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan J L, Blake D R. Patient non-compliance: deviance or reasoned decision-making?. Soc Sci Med 1992; 34: 507–513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilden M, Sidenius K, Langhoff-Roos J, et al. Women's experiences of the gynecologic examination: factors associated with discomfort. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 1030–1036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oscarsson M, Benzein E. Women's experiences of pelvic examination: an interview study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 2002; 23: 17–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen S B, Kragstrup J. Experiences of the first pelvic examination in a random sample of Danish teenagers. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995; 74: 137–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millstein S G, Adler N E, Irwin C E, Jr. Sources of anxiety about pelvic examinations among adolescent females. J Adolesc Health Care 1984; 5: 105–111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wijma B, Siwe K. Examiner's unique possibilities to catalyze women's empowerment during a pelvic examination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 1102–1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crombie I K, Orbell S, Johnston G, et al. Cervical screening: the optimum visit plan for contacting users and non-users in Scotland. J Epidemiol Community Health 1994; 48: 586–589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar