References
- McColl M, Davies D, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P. The community integration measure: Development and preliminary validation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 429–434
- Colantonio A, Ratcliff G, Chase S, Kelsey S, Escobar M, Vernich L. Long-term outcomes after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 253–261
- Corrigan J D, Whiteneck G, Mellick D. Perceived needs following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19: 205–216
- Bay E, Kreulen G J, Shavers C A, Currier C. A new perspective: A vulnerable population framework to guide research and practice for persons with traumatic brain injury. Res Theory Nurs Pract 2006; 20: 141–157
- Rice-Oxley M, Turner-Stokes L. Effectiveness of brain injury rehabilitation. Clin Rehab 1999; 13(Suppl 1)7–24
- Doig E, Kuipers P. Continuity and change in rehabilitation: The shift towards community based services. Health care policy and practice in Australia, S Taylor, M Foster, J Fleming. Oxford University Press, Melbourne 2007
- Barnes M P, Radermacher H. Neurological rehabilitation in the community. J Rehabil Med 2001; 33: 244–248
- Leith K H, Phillips L, Sample P L. Exploring the service needs and experiences of persons with TBI and their families: The South Carolina experience. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 1191–1208
- Anderson C. Stroke rehabilitation services to accelerate hospital discharge and provide home-based care: an overview and cost analysis. PharmacoEconomics 2002; 20: 537–553
- Koch L V, Wottrich A W, Holmqvist W L. Rehabilitation in the home versus the hospital: The importance of context. Disabil Rehabil 1998; 20: 367–372
- Mayo N E, Wood-Dauphinee S, Cote R, Gayton D, Carlton J, Buttery J, Tamblyn R. There's no place like home: An evaluation of early supported discharge for stroke. Stroke 2000; 31: 1016–1023
- Lefebvre H, Pelchat D, Swaine B, Gelinas I, Levert M J. The experiences of individuals with a traumatic brain injury, families, physicians and health professionals regarding care provided throughout the continuum. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 585–597
- World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Accessed July 2007 from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/site/index.cfm
- Stucki G, Üstün T B, Melvin J. Applying the ICF for the acute hospital and early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 349–352
- Bilbao A, Kennedy C, Chatterji S, Ustun B, Barquero J L, Barth J T. The ICF: Applications of the WHO model of functioning, disability and health to brain injury rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation 2003; 18: 239–250
- Pierce C A, Hanks R A. Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury and the World Health Organization model of disability. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 85: 889–898
- Kuipers P, Foster M, Bellamy N. Incorporation of environmental factors into outcomes research. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2003; 3: 125–129
- QSR - Qualitatative Solutions and Research QSR NVivo (Version 2.0) [Qualitative Data Analysis System Software]. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2004
- Stier-Jarmer M, Grill E, Ewert T, Bartholomeyczik S, Finger M, Mokrusch T, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF Core Set for patients with neurological conditions in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 389–395
- Koskinen S, Hokkinen E M, Sarajuuri J, Alaranta H. Applicability of the ICF checklist to traumatically brain-injured patients in post-acute rehabilitation settings. J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 467–472
- Whiteneck G G, Gerhart K A, Cusick C P. Identifying environmental factors that influence the outcomes of people with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19: 191–204
- Kendall E, Terry D. Psychosocial adjustment following closed head injury: A model for predicting outcome. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1996; 6: 16–23