Experiences of communication in women with endometriosis: perceived validation and invalidation in different contexts, and associations with health-related quality of life

References

• European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Endometriosis Guideline. 2022. Available from: https://www.eshre.eu/Guidelines-and-Legal/Guidelines/Endometriosis-guideline.
   Google Scholar
• Calagna G, Della Corte L, Giampaolino P, et al. Endometriosis and strategies of fertility preservation: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;254:218–225. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruszała M, Dłuski D, Winkler I, et al. The state of health and the quality of life in women suffering from endometriosis. J Clin Med Res. 2022;11(7):20259.
   Google Scholar
• Pope CJ, Sharma V, Sharma S, et al. A systematic review of the association between psychiatric disturbances and endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37(11):1006–1015. doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30050-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitale SG, La Rosa VL, Rapisarda AMC, et al. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and psychological well-being. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;38(4):317–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wróbel M, Wielgoś M, Laudański P. Diagnostic delay of endometriosis in adults and adolescence-current stage of knowledge. Adv Med Sci. 2022;67(1):148–153. doi:10.1016/j.advms.2022.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundström H, Hammar Spagnoli G, Lövqvist L, et al. Healthcare consumption and cost estimates concerning swedish women with endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2020;85(3):237–244. doi:10.1159/000507326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young K, Fisher J, Kirkman M. Endometriosis and fertility: women’s accounts of healthcare. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(3):554–562. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundström H, Alehagen S, Kjølhede P, et al. The double-edged experience of healthcare encounters among women with endometriosis: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(1-2):205–211. doi:10.1111/jocn.13872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matías-González Y, Sánchez-Galarza AN, Flores-Caldera I, et al. “Es que tú eres una changa”: stigma experiences among Latina women living with endometriosis. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;42(1):67–74. doi:10.1080/0167482X.2020.1822807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox H, Henderson L, Andersen N, et al. Focus group study of endometriosis: struggle, loss and the medical merry-go-round. Int J Nurs Pract. 2003;9(1):2–9. doi:10.1046/j.1440-172x.2003.00396.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilmour JA, Huntington A, Wilson HV. The impact of endometriosis on work and social participation. Int J Nurs Pract. 2008;14(6):443–448. doi:10.1111/j.1440-172X.2008.00718.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krsmanovic A, Dean M. How women suffering from endometriosis disclose about their disorder at work. Health Commun. 2022;37(8):992–1003. doi:10.1080/10410236.2021.1880053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson N, Culley L, Law C, et al. ‘We needed to change the mission statement of the marriage’: biographical disruptions, appraisals and revisions among couples living with endometriosis. Sociol Health Illn. 2016;38(5):721–735. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rush G, Misajon R, Hunter JA, et al. The relationship between endometriosis-related pelvic pain and symptom frequency, and subjective wellbeing. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1):123–129. doi:10.1186/s12955-019-1185-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Niekerk LM, Schubert E, Matthewson M. Emotional intimacy, empathic concern, and relationship satisfaction in women with endometriosis and their partners. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;42(1):81–87. doi:10.1080/0167482X.2020.1774547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmond S, Keefe FJ. Validating pain communication: current state of the science. Pain. 2015;156(2):215–219. doi:10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460301.18207.c2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linehan M. Validation and psychotherapy. In: Bohart A., Greenber L., editors. Empathy reconsidered: new directions in psychotherapy. American Psychological Association; 1997. p. 353–392. doi:10.1037/10226-000
   Google Scholar
• Shenk CE, Fruzzetti AE. The impact of validating and invalidating responses on emotional reactivity. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2011;30(2):163–183. doi:10.1521/jscp.2011.30.2.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAninch K, Delaney A, Basinger ED, et al. Validating communication in couples’ experience of chronic illness: associations with relational and health circumstances and overarching relational perceptions. West J Commun. 2022;556–577. doi: 10.1080/10570314.2022.2135385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones G, Kennedy S, Barnard A, et al. Development of an endometriosis quality-of-life instrument: the endometriosis health profile-30. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(2):258–264. doi:10.1097/00006250-200108000-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundström H, Rauden A, Wikman P, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the 30-item endometriosis health profile (EHP-30). BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JE, Lee MK, Hyun M-H, et al. The validity study of the validation and invalidation scale (VIRS) among college women with dating violence. Korean J Stress Res. 2012;20:159–167.
   Google Scholar
• Edlund SM, Wurm M, Holländare F, et al. Pain patients’ experiences of validation and invalidation from physicians before and after multimodal pain rehabilitation: associations with pain, negative affectivity, and treatment outcome. Scand J Pain. 2017;17(1):77–86. doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.07.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linton SJ, Flink IK, Nilsson E, et al. Can training in empathetic validation improve medical students’ communication with patients suffering pain? A test of concept. Pain Rep. 2017;2(3):e600. 2(3) doi:10.1097/PR9.0000000000000600
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zetterberg H, Owiredua C, Åsenlöf P, et al. Preventing pain and stress-related ill-health in employees: a 6-months follow-up of a psychosocial program in a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2023;33(2):316–328. doi:10.1007/s10926-022-10074-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–613. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manea L, Gilbody S, McMillan D. Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2012;184(3):E191–6. doi:10.1503/cmaj.110829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler M, Hetta J, Isacsson G, et al. An item response theory evaluation of three depression assessment instruments in a clinical sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):84. (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–1097. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer F, Manea L, Trepel D, et al. Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic meta analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016;39:24–31. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong RA. When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34(5):502–508. doi:10.1111/opo.12131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundström H, Kilander H, Wikman P, et al. Demographic and clinical characteristics determining patient-centeredness in endometriosis care. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(4):1047–1055. doi:10.1007/s00404-022-06887-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar