Oral mucosa grafting in periorbital reconstruction

References

• Mai C, Bertelmann E. Oral mucosal grafts: old technique in new light. Ophthalmic Res. 2013;50(2):91–98. doi:10.1159/000351631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes J, Collin R, Dart J. Split thickness buccal mucous membrane grafts and irradiation in the treatment of recurrent pterygium. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:1420–1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman DC. Use of free grafts in correction of recurrent pterygia, pseudopterygia and symblepharon. Calif Med. 1951;75(4):279–280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trivedi LK, Massey DB, Rohatgi R. Management of pterygium and its recurrence: by grafting with mucous membrane from the mouth. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68(2):353–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim CY, Woo YJ, Lee SY, Yoon JS. Postoperative outcomes of anophthalmic socket reconstruction using an autologous buccal mucosa graft. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(4):1171–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein M, Menneking H, Bier J. Reconstruction of the contracted ocular socket with free full-thickness mucosa graft. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;29(2):96–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasser QJ, Gombos DS, Williams MD, et al. Management of radiation-induced severe anophthalmic socket contracture in patients with uveal melanoma. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;28(3):208–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karesh JW, Putterman AM. Reconstruction of the partially contracted ocular socket or fornix. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(4):552–556.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Putterman AM, Karesh JW. A surgical technique for the successful and stable reconstruction of the totally contracted ocular socket. Ophthalmic Surg. 1988;19(3):193–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones EJB, Nunes E. The outcome of oral mucosal grafts to the orbit : a three-and-a-half-year study. Br J Plast Surg. 2002;55:100–104. doi:10.1054/bjps.2001.3779.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shore JW, Foster CS, Westfall CT, Rubin PA. Results of buccal mucosal grafting for patients with medically controlled ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(3):383–395. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31962-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I V K, Taich A, Elner VM. Anterior lamellar recession with buccal mucous membrane grafting for cicatricial entropion. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;25(3):180–184. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181a13f0e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer G, Pillai VS, Srinivasan B, Guruswami S, Padmanabhan P. Mucous membrane grafting for lid margin keratinization in Stevens–Johnson syndrome: results. Cornea. 2010;29(2):146–151. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181ae2691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosni FA. Repair of trachomatous cicatricial entropion using mucous membrane graft. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974;91(1):49–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White JH. Correction of distichiasis by tarsal resection and mucous membrane grafting. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;80(3(Pt 2)):507–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu YAO, Liu J, Tseng SCG. Oral mucosal graft to correct lid margin pathologic features in cicatricial ocular surface diseases. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152:600–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheirkhah A, Ghaffari R, Kaghazkanani R, Hashemi H, Behrouz MJ, Raju VK. A combined approach of amniotic membrane and oral mucosa transplantation for fornix reconstruction in severe symblepharon. Cornea. 2013;32(2):155–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheirkhah A, Blanco G, Casas V, Hayashida Y, Raju VK, Tseng SC. Surgical strategies for fornix reconstruction based on symblepharon severity. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(2):266–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Sheha H, Fu YAO, Giegengack M, Tseng SCG. Oral mucosal graft with amniotic mebrane transplantation for total limbal stem cell deficiency. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152:739–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Tian Y, Zhu H, Cheng Y, Zheng X, Wu J. Tenonplasty combined with free oral buccal mucosa autografts for repair of sclerocorneal melt caused by chemical burns. Cornea. 2015;34(10):1240–1244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rootman DB, Trope GE, Rootman DS. Glaucoma aqueous drainage device erosion repair with buccal mucous membrane grafts. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(8):618–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch JR, Sampath R, Lavin MJ, Leatherbarrow B. Autogenous labial mucous membrane and banked scleral patch grafting for exposed retinal explants. Eye. 1997;11((Pt1)):43–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziai S, Rootman DS, Slomovic AR, Chan CC. Oral buccal mucous membrane allograft with a corneal lamellar graft for the repair of boston type 1 keratoprosthesis stromal melts. Cornea. 2013;32(11):1516–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu S, Pillai VS, Sangwan VS. Mucosal complications of modified osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis in chronic stevens-johnson syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(5):867–873.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao JP, Luppens D, Mccord CD. Buccal mucous membrane graft-assisted lacrimal drainage surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26(1):39–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell CB 3rd, Shannon GM, Flanagan JC. Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with mucous membrane graft. Ophthalmic Surg. 1983;14(8):647–652.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leone CRJ. Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with buccal mucosal graft. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(1):113–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Can I, Can B, Yarangümeli A, Gürbüz O, Tekelioglu M, Kural G. CDCR with buccal mucosal graft: comparative and histopathological study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30(2):98–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murube J. Labial salivary gland transplantation in severe dry eye. Oculoplast Orbital Reconstr Surg. 1998;1:104–110.
   Google Scholar
• Sant’ Anna AE, Hazarbassanov RM, De Freitas D, Gomes JÁ. Minor salivary glands and labial mucous membrane graft in the treatment of severe symblepharon and dry eye in patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(2):234–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinho DR, Burmann TG, Kwitko S. Labial salivary gland transplantation for severe dry eye due to chemical burns and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26(3):182–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HE, Jang SY, Yoon JS. Combined orbital floor wedge implant and fornix reconstruction for postenucleation sunken socket syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(6):1469–1475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dortzbach RK, Callahan A. Advances in socket reconstruction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1970;70(5):800–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morax S, Hurbli T. Orbito-palpebral reconstruction in anophthalmos and severe congenital microphthalmos. Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;9:67–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee AC, Fedorovich I, Heinz GW, Kikkawa DO. Socket reconstruction with combined mucous membrane and hard palate mucosal grafts. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2002;33(6):463–468.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molgat YM, Hurwitz JJ, Webb MCF. Buccal mucous membrane-fat graft in the management of the contracted socket. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;9(4):267–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon KC, Yang Y, Jeong IY, Kook MS. Buccal mucosal graft for hydroxyapatite orbital implant exposure. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2011;55(3):318–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiligenhaus A, Shore JW, Rubin PA CF. Long-term results of mucous membrane grafting in ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Implications for patient selection and surgical considerations. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(9):1283–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr T, Mancini R. Shared buccal mucosal graft for simultaneous repair of severe upper and lower eyelid cicatricial entropion. Orbit. 2016;35(1):24–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhaus RW, Baylis HI, Shorr N. Complications at mucous membrane donor sites. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;93(5):643–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCord CD, Chen WP. Tarsal polishing and mucous membrane grafting for cicatricial entropion, trichiasis and epidermalization. Ophthalmic Surg. 1983;14:1021–1025.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamal S, Kumar S. Oral mucosal graft to correct lid margin pathologic features in. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(2):386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Meulen JC. The use of mucosa-lined flaps in eyelid reconstruction: A new approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;70:139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehouse GM, Francis IC. Eyelid reconstruction using a monopedicle flap and buccal mucosa: report of 15 cases. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1988;16(4):295–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakai S. Marginal eyelid reconstruction with a composite skin-muscle-mucosa graft from the lower lip. Ann Plast Surg. 1993;30(5):445–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz AA, Menezes FA, Chaves R, Pinto Coelho R, Velasco EF, Kikuta H. Eyelid abnormalities in lamellar ichthyoses. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(10):1895–1898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soparkar CN, Patrinely JR, Hunt MG, Shenaq SM. Transforming mucous membrane grafts into skin grafts. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(11):1933–1934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng C. Surgical reconstruction in cryptophthalmos. Br J Plast Surg. 1998;51(1):17–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Das JK, Medhi J, Chakravarty R, Soibam R. Mucous membrane grafting for the post-Steven-Johnson syndrome symblepharon: a case report. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59(3):231–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubota K, Satake Y, Ohyama M, et al. Surgical reconstruction of the ocular surface in advanced ocular cicatricial pemphigoid and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122(1):38–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon A, Espana EM, Tseng SC. Amniotic membrane transplantation for reconstruction of the conjunctival fornices. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(1):93–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brothers DM. Full-thickness mucous membrane transplant for severe keratitis sicca. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101(3):485–486.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klein. Zur operation des pterygium und zur transplantation von scheimhaut. Allgem Weiner Med Zeitung. 1876:3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Fine M Recurrent pterygium: mucous membrane grafts. Symposium on medical and surgical diseases of the cornea. In: Transactions of the New Orleans Academy of Ophthalmology. St Louis; 1980:533–540.
   Google Scholar
• Calabre C, Fantin J, Bondier JM, Legout N. Value of the buccal mucous graft in the treatment of pterygium. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr. 1978;78(6–7):493–495.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hille K, Grabner G, Liu C, et al. Standards for modified osteoodontokeratoprosthesis (OOKP) surgery according to Strampelli and Falcinelli: the Rome-Vienna protocol. Cornea. 2005;24(8):895–908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu S, Sureka S, Shukla R, Sangwan V. Boston type 1 based keratoprosthesis (Auro Kpro) and its modification (LVP Kpro) in chronic Stevens Johnson syndrome. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;24:2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hollick EJ, Watson SL, Dart JK, Luthert PJ, Allan BD. Legeais BioKpro III keratoprosthesis implantation: long term results in seven patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(9):1146–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putterman A. Conjunctival flap - cosmetic shell - ptosis procedure. Treatment of blepharoptosis in severe keratopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:1816–1818.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heher KL, Katowitz JA. Oral mucous membrane grafts for corneal protection to permit prosthetic shell wear. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;13(1):40–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma’luf RN, Awwad ST. Mucous membrane graft versus gunderson conjunctival flap for fitting a scleral shell over a sensitive cornea. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21(5):356–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rootman DB, Kumar NL, Rootman DS, Trope GE. Buccal mucous membrane for the reconstruction of complicated leaking trabeculectomy blebs. J Glaucoma. 2010;19(4):270–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benlier E, Bozkurt M, Kulahci Y. An alternative procedure for conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy: supratrochlear artery-based island flap combined with buccal mucosal graft. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60(1):55–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch J, Aggarwal RK, Eagling EM. Removal of scleral explants: a 10 year retrospective study. Eye. 1992;6:570–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Welch R. Removal of scleral explant elements. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101:570–573.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hilton G, Wallyn R. The removal of scleral buckles. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96:2061–2063.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwarz PI, Pruett RC. Factors influencing retinal redetachment after removal of explant elements. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95:804–807.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Güerrissi JO, Belmonte J. Surgical treatment of dry eye syndrome: conjunctival graft of the minor salivary gland. J Craniofac Surg. 2004;15(1):6–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raus P. Radiosurgery aids in salivary gland transplants for severe dry eye. Ocul Surg News. 2003;12:15–16.
   Google Scholar
• Luo SR, Zou LH, Yan C, et al. Transplantation of autologous labial salivary glands for severe dry eye. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2013;49(1):22–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geerling G, Raus P, Murube J. Minor salivary gland transplantation. Dev Ophthalmol. 2008;41:243–254.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soares EJ, França VP. Transplantation of labial salivary glands for severe dry eye treatment. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2005;68(4):481–489.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• França IS, Medrado J, França VP, Soares EJ. Treatment of dry anophthalmic cavities with labial salivary glands transplantation. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2011;74(6):425–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz MR, Margarone JE, Barbagli G, Scannapieco FA. Oral mucosa harvest: an overview of anatomic and biologic considerations. EAU-EBU Updat Ser. 2007;5(5):179–187.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer J, Squier CA, Gersen SJ. The Structure and Function of Oral Mucosa. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: New York: Pergamon Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Kamp S, Knoll T, Osman M, Häcker A, Michel MS, Alken P. Donor-site morbidity in buccal mucosa urethroplasty: lower lip or inner cheek? BJU Int. 2005;96(4):619–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolstunov L, Pogrel A. The free buccal mucosal graft for urethroplasty. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;82(6):613–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolstunov L, Pogrel MA, McAninch JW. Intraoral morbidity following free buccal mucosal graft harvesting for urethroplasty. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;84(5):480–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muruganandam K, Dubey D, Gulia AK, et al. Closure versus nonclosure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site: a prospective randomized study on post operative morbidity. Indian J Urol. 2009;25(1):72–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holsinger FC, Bui DT. Anatomy, function, and evaluation of the salivary glands. In Salivary Gland Disorders. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2007:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Shen M, Liu X, Si Y, Yu G. Characteristics of the saliva flow rates of minor salivary glands in healthy people. Arch Oral Biol. 2014;60(3):385–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presland RB, Dale BA. Epithelial structural proteins of the skin and oral cavity: function in health and disease. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2000;11:383–408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duckett JW, Coplen D, Ewalt D, Baskin LS. Buccal mucosal urethral replacement. J Urol. 1995;153(5):1660–1663.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen SD, Armenakas NA, Light DM, Fracchia JA, Glasberg SB. Single-surgeon experience of 87 buccal mucosal graft harvests. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(1):101–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyuz M, Gunes M, Koca O, Sertkaya Z, Kanberoglu H, Karaman MI. Evaluation of intraoral complications of buccal mucosa graft in augmentation urethroplasty. Turkish J Urol. 2014;40(3):156–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudney JD, Chen R. The vital status of human buccal epithelial cells and the bacteria associated with them. Arch Oral Biol. 2006;51:291–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker DM. Oral mucosal immunology: an overview. Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33(4 Suppl):27–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong E, Fernando A, Alhasso A, Stewart L. Does closure of the buccal mucosal graft bed matter? Results from a randomized controlled trial. Urology. 2014;84(5):1223–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotozono C, Inatomi T, Nakamura T, et al. Cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation for persistent epithelial defect in severe ocular surface diseases with acute inflammatory activity. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:e447–e453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geerling G, Honnicke K, Schröder C, et al. Quality of salivary tears following autologous submandibular gland transplantation for severe dry eye. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238(1):45–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett JE. The management of total xerophthalmia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969;81(5):667–682.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sumi M, Yamada T, Takagi Y, Nakamura T. MR imaging of labial glands. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(8):1552–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozkurt İH, Yalcinkaya F, Sertcelik MN, Zengin K. Comparison of uni-and bilateral buccal mucosal harvesting in terms of oral morbidity. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish J Urol. 2013;39(1):43–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eppley BL, Keating M, Rink R. A buccal mucosal harvesting technique for urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 1997;157(4):1268–1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey AF, McAninch JW. Technique of harvesting buccal mucosa for urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 1996;155(5):1696–1697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel A, Dalela D, Sinha RJ, Sankhwar SN. Harvesting buccal mucosa graft under local infiltration analgesia-mitigating need for general anesthesia. Urology. 2008;72(3):675–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke K, McKinny S, St. Martin B. Effect of wound closure on buccal mucosal graft harvest site morbidity: results of a randomized prospective trial. Urology. 2012;79(2):443–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhargava S, Chapple CR. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: is it the new gold standard? BJU Int. 2004;93(9):1191–1193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauer G, Schimming R, Frankenschmidt A. Intraoral wound closure with tissue-engineered mucosa: new perspectives for urethra reconstruction with buccal mucosa grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(1):25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabbroni G, Loukota RA, Eardley I. Buccal mucosal grafts for urethroplasty: surgical technique and morbidity. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;43(4):320–323. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.11.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dublin N, Stewart LH. Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty. BJU Int. 2004;94(6):867–869. doi:10.1111/bju.2004.94.issue-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang TL, Erickson B, Medendorp A, Gonzalez CM. Comparison of donor site intraoral morbidity after mucosal graft harvesting for urethral reconstruction. Urology. 2005;66(4):716–720. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood DN, Allen SE, Andrich DE, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The morbidity of buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty and the effect of nonclosure of the graft harvest site on postoperative pain. J Urol. 2004;172(2):580–583. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000132846.01144.9f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal S, Singh V, Sankhwar S, et al. Re: Rourke et al.: effect of wound closure on buccal mucosal graft harvest site morbidity: results of a randomized prospective trial (Urology 2012;79:443-447). Urology. 2012;79(5):1193. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumen N, Vierstraete-Verlinde S, Oosterlinck W, et al. Buccal versus lingual mucosa graft in anterior urethroplasty: a prospective comparison of surgical outcome and donor site morbidity. J Urol. 2016;195(1):112–117. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner JN, Wisenbaugh ES, Martins FE. Bulbar urethral stricture: how to optimise the use of buccal mucosal grafts. Arab J Urol. 2016;14(2):78–83. doi:10.1016/j.aju.2016.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts MT, Collin R. The use of fibrin glue in mucous membrane grafting of the fornix. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992;23(10):689–690.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta VP, Gupta P, Gupta R. Re: “Labial salivary gland transplantation for severe dry eye due to chemical burns and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27(4):307–308. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e318201cba6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson JM, Bullock AJ, MacNeil S, Chapple CR. Methods to reduce the contraction of tissue-engineered buccal mucosa for use in substitution urethroplasty. Eur Urol. 2011;60:856–861. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris GL, Spohn WG. Repair of the contracted socket using RTV silicone as a stent for mucosal grafting. Ophthalmic Surg. 1983;14(8):671–674.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sullivan SA, Dailey RA. Graft contraction: a comparison of acellular dermis versus hard palate mucosa in lower eyelid surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:14–24. doi:10.1097/00002341-200301000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan A, Tan DT, Tan XW, Mehta JS. Osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis: systematic review of surgical outcomes and complication rates. Ocul Surf. 2012;10(1):15–25. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2012.01.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Okera S, Tandon R, Herold J, Hull C, Thorp S. Visual rehabilitation in end-stage inflammatory ocular surface disease with the osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis: results from the UK. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(9):1211–1217. doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.130567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer G, Pillai VS, Srinivasan B, et al. Modified osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis, the Indian experience: results in the first 50 cases. Cornea. 2010;29(7):771–776. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181ca31fc.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranchod TM, Wu WW, Gausas RE. Botulinum toxin as novel treatment for excess mucous membrane graft secretions. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24(5):411–413. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e318182fc15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa K, Hayasaka S, Matsunou H, Nagaki Y. Presumed minor salivary gland secretion in a patient with a history of oral mucous membrane graft. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(2):374–375. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00189-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier CR, Jordan DR, Brownstein S, Li S. An unusual complication associated with hard palate mucosal grafts: presumed minor salivary gland secretion. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;14(4):256–260. doi:10.1097/00002341-199807000-00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marback EF, Gonzaga RL, Rigueiro MP, Martins MC, Erwenne CM. Fordyce nodules in a buccal membrane graft to the ocular surface. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;18(4):308–309. doi:10.1097/00002341-200207000-00014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson AW, Jakobiec FA, Reifler DM, Hornblass A. Ectopic epibulbar Fordyce nodules in a buccal mucous membrane graft. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;100(5):724–727. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(85)90630-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landenberger H, Siepmann K, Rohrbach JM. Hyperplasia of sebaceous glands (Fordyce’s disease) in an oral mucocutaneous graft: 45-year follow-up. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1999;214(3):185–187. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1034774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daicker B, Bijlenga R. Eine kosmetisch entstellende Spätkomplikation der Denigschen Schleimhauttransplantation: fordyce’s Disease im Transplantat. Ophthalmologica. 1973;166:180–187. doi:10.1159/000306809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldamone AA, Edstrom LE, Koyle MA, Rabinowitz R, Hulbert WC. Buccal mucosal grafts for urethral reconstruction. Urology. 1998;51:15–19. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00088-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane CJ, Tarman GJ, Summerton DJ, et al. Multi-institutional experience with buccal mucosa onlay urethroplasty for bulbar urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 2002;167(3):1314–1317. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65289-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey D, Kumar A, Bansal P, et al. Substitution urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures, a critical appraisal of various techniques. BJU Int. 2003;91:215–218. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.03064.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz MR, Lukose MA, Margarone JE, Barbagli G, Miller KS, Chuang SK. The oral mucosa graft: a systematic review. J Urol. 2007;178(2):387–394. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz MR, DeSantis JL, Margarone JE, Pogrel MA, Chuang SK. Morbidity associated with oral mucosa harvest for urological reconstruction: an overview. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(4):739–744. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.11.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers JB, Brant WO. Editorial comment. Urology. 2012;79(6):1395. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alwaal A, Harris CR, Enriquez A, McAninch JW, Breyer BN. Healing of donor-site buccal mucosa urethroplasty. Urology. 2015;86(3):e9–e10. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölzle F, Mitchell DA, Rau A, et al. Assessment of the perfusion and morbidity of the buccal mucosal donor site for grafting of urethral strictures. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2012;40(1):47–50. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2010.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbagli G, Vallasciani S, Romano G, Fabbri F, Guazzoni G, Lazzeri M. Morbidity of oral mucosa graft harvesting from a single cheek. Eur Urol. 2010;58(1):33–41. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.01.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbagli G, Lazzeri M. Re: Rourke et al.: effect of wound closure on buccal mucosal graft harvest site morbidity: results of a randomized prospective trial (Urology 2012;79:443-448). Urology. 2012;80(3):741–742. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum CM, Schmid M, Ludwig TA, et al. Redo buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty: success rate, oral morbidity and functional outcomes. BJU Int. 2016;118(5):797–803. doi:10.1111/bju.13528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao AR, Shergill I, Thwaini A, Karim O, Motiwala H. Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty. BJU Int. 2005;95(4):679. doi:10.1111/bju.2005.95.issue-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatov VP, Chevaljev VE. Untitled letter. J Ophthalmol. 1951;55:893.
   Google Scholar
• Murube-del-Castillo J. Transplantation of salivary gland to the lacrimal basin. Scand J Rheumatol. 1986;61(Suppl.):264–267.
   Google Scholar
• Sieg P, Geerling G, Kosmehl H, Lauer I, Warnecke K, Von Domarus H. Microvascular submandibular gland transfer for severe cases of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(3):554–560. doi:10.1097/00006534-200009010-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pa V K, Hickey MJ, Gurusinghe CJ, O’Brien BM. Long term results of submandibular gland transfer for the management of xerophthalmia. Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44:506–508. doi:10.1016/0007-1226(91)90006-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar PA, Macleod AM, O’Brien BM, Hickey MJ, Knight KR. Microvascular submandibular gland transfer for the management of xerophthalmia; an experimental study. Br J Plast Surg. 1990;43(4):431–436. doi:10.1016/0007-1226(90)90008-N.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geerling G, Sieg P, Bastian GO, Laqua H. Transplantation of the autologous submandibular gland for most severe cases of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(2):327–335. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)93406-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrelli M, Schröder C, Dart JK, et al. Long-term follow-up after submandibular gland transplantation in severe dry eyes secondary to cicatrizing conjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(6):894–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge XY, Yu GY, Fu J, et al. An experimental study of the management of severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca with autologous reduced-sized submandibular gland transplantation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50(6):562–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauer I, Sieg P, Bähre M, Richter E. Salivary gland scintigraphy using technetium-99m-pertechnetate after autotransplantation of the submandibular salivary gland in the correction of dry eye. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25(2):128–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacLeod A, Kumar PA, Hertess I, Al E. Microvascular submandibular gland transfers: an alternative approach for total xerophthalmia. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;43:437–440.
   Google Scholar
• Yu GY, Zhu ZH, Mao C, et al. Microvascular autologous submandibular gland transfer in severe cases of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;33:235–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar