Success of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without stents: systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Caldwell G. Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct, with preservation of the canaliculi, and with an incidental description of a new lachrymal probe. Am J Ophthalmol. 1893;10:189–193.
   Google Scholar
• McDonogh MMJ. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol. 1989;103:585–587. doi:10.1017/s0022215100109405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs DC. New probe for the intubation of lacrimal canaliculi with silicone rubber tubing. Br J Ophthalmol. 1967;51:198. doi:10.1136/bjo.51.3.198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katowitz JA. Silicone tubing in canalicular obstructions: a preliminary t report. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974;91:459–462. doi:10.1001/archopht.1974.03900060473009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Min ETL, Tevarag JMP, Hitam WHW, Ramza R, Abdullah B, Hussein A. Effect of stenting and mucosal flap preservation on outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Int Eye Sci. 2014;14:381–385.
   Google Scholar
• Longari F, Dehgani Mobaraki P, Ricci AL, Lapenna R, Cagini C, Ricci G. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: 4 years retrospective study. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2016;273:2079–2084. doi:10.1007/s00405-015-3876-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeon JY, Shim WS. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicone stent. Acta Otolaryngol. 2012;132(SUPPL. 1):S77–81. doi:10.3109/00016489.2012.659754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed MI, Head EJ, Madurska M, Hendry J, Erikitola OC, Cain AJ. Endoscopic primary dacryocystorhinostomy: are silicone tubes needed? Our experience in sixty-three patients. Clin Otolaryngol. 2013;38:406–410. doi:10.1111/coa.12152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza CD, Nissar J. Experience with endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142:389–393. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2009.12.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey SP, Munjal VR, Endoscopic DCR. how to improve the results. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;66:178–181. doi:10.1007/s12070-014-0702-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohamad SH, Khan I, Shakeel M, Nandapalan V. Long-term results of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stenting. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95:196–199. doi:10.1308/003588413X13511609957939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önerci M, Orhan M, Öğretmenoğlu O. Long term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120:319–322. doi:10.1080/000164800750001170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unlu HH, Toprak B, Aslan A, Guler C. Comparison of surgical outcomes in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002;111:704–709. doi:10.1177/000348940211100809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Cai J, Zhang J, Han X. A meta-analysis of primary dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011;46:521–527. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2011.09.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smirnov G, Tuomilehto H, Teräsvirta M, Nuutinen J, Seppä J. Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized study. Am J Rhinol. [Internet]. 2008;22:214–217. doi:10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang MG, Shim WS, Keun D, Joo S, Kim Y, Hahn JL, et al. A systematic review of benefit of silicone intubation in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;11:81–88. doi:10.21053/ceo.2018.00031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Kim SI, Jin HJ, Kim S, Hwang SH. The clinical efficacy of silicone stents for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;1:151–157. doi:10.21053/ceo.2017.01781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ing EB, Bedi H, Hussain A, Zakrewski H, Ing R, Nijhawan N, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017;53(5):466–470. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie CQ, Zhang L, Liu Y, Ma H, Li S. Comparing the success rate of dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: a trial sequential analysis of randomized control trials. Sci Rep. 2017;7. article 1936. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02070-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayers T, Dolman PJ. Bicanalicular silicone stents in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results of a randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:2255–2259. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harugop AS, Mudhol RS, Rekha BK, Maheswaran M. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;60:335–340. doi:10.1007/s12070-008-0112-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Altman DGSJ. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chinchester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2011:649p. doi:10.1002/9780470712184.ch8.
   Google Scholar
• Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT AD. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chinchester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2019:187–241. doi:10.1002/9781119536604.
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ. GRADE: what is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? Chin J Evidence-Based Med. 2009;9:133–137.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qahtani AS. Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tubing: a prospective randomized study. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012;26:332–334. doi:10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao SVM, Rajshekar MM. Dacryocystorhinostomy stent insertion in initial endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Rhinol. 2016;9:120–124. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1284.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad S, Pant B. Role of silicone stenting in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy : a comparative study. Int J Adv Integ Med Sci. 2016;1:4–6. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10050-0002.
   Google Scholar
• Raghav MG, Naga R, Raghavan D. A comparative study of the results of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stent placement. J Mar Med Soc. 2018;20:135–137. doi:10.4103/jmms.jmms_31_18.
   Google Scholar
• Smitha SG, Jagannath BS. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone stent: a comparative study. J Med Schi Clin Res. 2016;4:12861–12864.
   Google Scholar
• Chong KKL, Lai FHP, Ho M, Luk A, Wong BW, Young A. Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:2139–2145. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unlu HH, Gunhan K, Baser EF, Songu M. Long-term results in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: is intubation really required? Otolaryngol – Head Neck Surg. 2009;140:589–595. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2008.12.056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakkar V, Chugh J, Sachdeva S, Sharma N. Silicone stent : a comparative study. Internet J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;9:2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy YM, Reddy YG, Kumar SP. A comparative study of outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone stenting. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14:2279–2286.
   Google Scholar
• Shashidhar K, Nagalotimath U, Dixit D. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone stenting : a comparative study. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2014;7:244–247.
   Google Scholar
• Marcet MM, Kuk AKT, Phelps PO. Evidence-based review of surgical practices in endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction and other new indications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25:443–448. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar