REFERENCES
- Ashworth J L. The hydroxyapatite orbital implant: a prospective study. Eye 1996; 10: 29–37
- Ashworth J L. A clinical study of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Eur J Ophthalmol 1997; 7: 1–8
- Blaydon S M. The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 19: 364–371
- Chen Y H, Cui H G. High density porous polyethylene material (Medpor) as an unwrapped orbital implant. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2006; 7: 679–682
- Cheng M S. Late porous polyethylene implant exposure after motility coupling post placement. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 138: 420–424
- Christmas N J. Intraorbital implants after enucleation and their complications: a 10-year review. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 1199–1203
- Edelstein C. Complications of motility peg placement for the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1128–1129
- Fong KS, Choo CT. Hydroxyapatite orbital implants—our local experience. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1997; 26: 405–408
- Georgiadis N S. Coralline hydroxyapatite sphere in orbit restoration. Eur J Ophthalmol 1999; 9: 302–308
- Jordan DR. Spontaneous loosening of hydroxyapatite peg sleeves. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 2041–2044
- Jordan DR. Problems after evisceration surgery with porous orbital implants: experience with 86 patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 20: 374–380
- Jordan DR, Bawazeer A. Experience with 120 synthetic hydroxyapatite implants (FCI3). Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 17: 184–190
- Jordan DR, Klapper SR. A new titanium peg system for hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 16: 380–387
- Jordan DR. Complications associated with pegging hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 505–512
- Jordan DR. The bioceramic orbital implant: experience with 107 implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2003a; 19: 128–135
- Jordan DR. The use of vicryl mesh in 200 porous orbital implants: a technique with few exposures. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2003b; 19: 53–61
- Jordan DR. Coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant (bio-eye): experience with 158 patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 20: 69–74
- Lee S Y. Complications in motility peg placement for hydroxyapatite orbital implant in anophthalmic socket. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2002; 46: 103–107
- Lin CJ. Complications of motility peg placement for porous hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 394–396
- Mules PH. Evisceration of the globe, with artificial vitreous. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1885; 5: 200–2006
- Norda A G, Meyer-Rusenberg H W. Experience with orbital implants in particular with porous hydroxyapatite materials. Ophthalmologe 2003; 100: 435–436
- Oestreicher JH. Treatment of exposed Coral implant after failed scleral patch graft. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 10: 110–113
- Oestreicher J H, Liu E, Berkowitz M. Complications of hydroxyapatite orbital implants. A review of 100 consecutive cases and a comparison of Dexon mesh (polyglycolic acid) with scleral wrapping. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 324–329
- Perry AC. Advances in enucleation. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 4: 173–182
- Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 6th ed. Duxbury Press, Toronto 2006, chapter 10.6
- Sarvananthan N. Synthetic hydroxyapatite orbital implants: a clinical and MRI evaluation. Eye 1999; 13: 205–208
- Shields C L. Hydroxyapatite orbital implant after enucleation. Experience with initial 100 consecutive cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110: 333–338
- Shields C L. Lack of complications of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant in 250 consecutive cases. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1993a; 91: 177–189
- Shields J A. Hydroxyapatite orbital implant after enucleation– experience with 200 cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1993b; 68: 1191–1195
- Su G W, Yen M T. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 20: 274–280
- Suter A J. Long term follow up of bone derived hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 1287–1292
- Trichopoulos N, Augsburger J J. Enucleation with unwrapped porous and nonporous orbital implants: a 15-year experience. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 21: 331–336