Agreebot introduction dialogue in human–robot interaction: improving the acceptability of robot statements on incapable robotic experiences

References

• Mattias Wahde MV. Conversational agents: theory and applications. preprint, 2012. arXiv:2202.03164.
   Google Scholar
• Tulshan AS, Dhage SN. Survey on virtual assistant: Google Assistant, Siri, Cortana, Alexa. In: Advances in signal processing and intelligent recognition systems. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 190–201.
   Google Scholar
• Laban P, Canny J, Hearst MA. What's the latest? A question-driven news chatbot. preprint, 2021. arXiv:2105.05392.
   Google Scholar
• Herse S, Vitale J, Ebrahimian D, et al. Bon appetit! robot persuasion for food recommendation. In: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction; HRI '18. Association for Computing Machinery; 2018. p. 125–126.
   Google Scholar
• Sakai K, Nakamura Y, Yoshikawa Y, et al. Effect of robot embodiment on satisfaction with recommendations in shopping malls. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2022;7(1):366–372. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3128233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song S, Baba J, Okafuji Y, et al. Out for in! empirical study on the combination power of two service robots for product recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction; HRI '23. Association for Computing Machinery; 2023. p. 408–416.
   Google Scholar
• Yamazaki T, Yoshikawa K, Kawamoto T, et al. Tourist guidance robot based on HyperCLOVA. preprint, 2022. arXiv:2210.10400.
   Google Scholar
• Higashinaka R, Minato T, Sakai K, et al. Dialogue robot competition for the development of an android robot with hospitality. In: 2022 IEEE 11th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), Osaka, Japan; 2022. p. 357–360.
   Google Scholar
• Sugiyama H, Mizukami M, Arimoto T, et al. Empirical analysis of training strategies of transformer-based japanese chit-chat systems. In: 2022 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), Doha, Qatar; 2023. p. 685–691.
   Google Scholar
• Minato T, Sakai K, Uchida T, et al. A study of interactive robot architecture through the practical implementation of conversational android. Front Robot AI. 2022;9:Article ID 905030. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.905030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida T, Minato T, Nakamura Y, et al. Female-type android's drive to quickly understand a user's concept of preferences stimulates dialogue satisfaction: dialogue strategies for modeling user's concept of preferences. Int J Soc Robot. 2021;13(6):1499–1516. doi: 10.1007/s12369-020-00731-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida T, Minato T, Ishiguro H. Does a conversational robot need to have its own values?: A study of dialogue strategy to enhance people's motivation to use autonomous conversational robots. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction, Biopolis, Singapore; 2016. p. 187–192.
   Google Scholar
• Uchida T, Minato T, Ishiguro H. The relationship between dialogue motivation and attribution of subjective opinions to conversational androids. Trans Jpn Soc Artif Intell. 2019;34(1):B-I62_1–8. doi: 10.1527/tjsai.B-I62
   Google Scholar
• Uchida T, Minato T, Ishiguro H. A values-based dialogue strategy to build motivation for conversation with autonomous conversational robots. In: 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), New York, USA; 2016 Aug. p. 206–211.
   Google Scholar
• Tokuhisa R, Terashima R. Relationship between utterances and ‘enthusiasm’ in non-task-oriented conversational dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 7th SIGdial workshop on discourse and dialogue – SigDIAL '06; Morristown (NJ): Association for Computational Linguistics; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Sytsma J, Machery E. Two conceptions of subjective experience. Philos Stud. 2010;151(2):299–327. doi: 10.1007/s11098-009-9439-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur MB, Reichling DB. Navigating a social world with robot partners: A quantitative cartography of the uncanny valley. Cognition. 2016;146:22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glas DF, Minato T, Ishi CT, et al. ERICA: the ERATO intelligent conversational android. In: 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), New York, USA; 2016. p. 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Asch SE. Opinions and social pressure. Sci Am. 1955;193(5):31–35. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1155-31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif M. A study of some social factors in perception. Arch Psychol (Columbia University). 1935;187:60.
   Google Scholar
• Shiomi M, Hagita N. Do synchronized multiple robots exert peer pressure? In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference On Human Agent Interaction; Association for Computing Machinery; 2016. p. 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Salomons N, van der Linden M, Strohkorb Sebo S, et al. Humans conform to robots: disambiguating trust, truth, and conformity. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction; Association for Computing Machinery; 2018. p. 187–195.
   Google Scholar
• Mahzoon H, Ogawa K, Yoshikawa Y, et al. Effect of self-representation of interaction history by the robot on perceptions of mind and positive relationship: A case study on a home-use robot. Adv Robot. 2019;33(21):1112–1128. doi: 10.1080/01691864.2019.1676823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu C, Yoshikawa Y, Iio T, et al. Sharing experiences to help a robot present its mind and sociability. Int J Soc Robot. 2021;13(2):341–352. doi: 10.1007/s12369-020-00643-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsuno S, Yoshikawa Y, Ban M, et al. Evaluation of a Daily interactive chatbot that exchanges information about others through long-term use in a group of friends. Trans Jpn Soc Artif Intell. 2022;37(3):IDS 10IDS–I_1 –14. doi: 10.1527/tjsai.37-3_IDS-I
   Google Scholar
• Mitsuno S, Yoshikawa Y, Ishiguro H. Robot-on-Robot gossiping to improve sense of human-robot conversation. In: 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Naples, Italy; 2020. p. 653–658.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R. Experimenter effects in behavioral research. Enlarged. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Charness G, Gneezy U, Kuhn MA. Experimental methods: between-subject and within-subject design. J Econ Behav Organ. 2012;81(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JD, Young S. Partially observable Markov decision processes for spoken dialog systems. Comput Speech Lang. 2007;21(2):393–422. doi: 10.1016/j.csl.2006.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MK, Forlizzi J, Kiesler S, et al. Personalization in HRI: a longitudinal field experiment. In: 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Boston, MA, USA; 2012. p. 319–326.
   Google Scholar
• Mizutani N, Mizutani O. How to be polite in Japanese. Tokyo: Japan Times; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka A. Kisses, handshakes, bows: the semantics of nonverbal communication. Semiotica. 1995;103(3–4):207–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng M, Kato M, Saunders JA, et al. Paired walkers with better first impression synchronize better. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(2):Article ID e0227880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Salesse RN, Gueugnon M, et al. Moving attractive virtual agent improves interpersonal coordination stability. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;41:240–254. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Salesse RN, Marin L, et al. Likability's effect on interpersonal motor coordination: exploring natural gaze direction. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1864. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Yamashita N, Nakanishi H, et al. Blurring autonomous and teleoperated produces the feeling of talking with a robot's operator. Inf Process Soc Jpn. 2016;57(4):1108–1115.
   Google Scholar
• Heerink M, Kröse B, Evers V, et al. Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. Int J Soc Robot. 2010;2(4):361–375. doi: 10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belur J, Tompson L, Thornton A, et al. Interrater reliability in systematic review methodology: exploring variation in coder decision-making. Sociol Methods Res. 2021;50(2):837–865. doi: 10.1177/0049124118799372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith B, McGannon KR. Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2018;11(1):101–121. doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite I, Martinho C, Paiva A. Social robots for long-term interaction: a survey. Int J Soc Robot. 2013;5(2):291–308. doi: 10.1007/s12369-013-0178-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Siau K. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, automation, robotics, future of work and future of humanity: a review and research agenda. J Database Manag. 2019;30(1):61–79. doi: 10.4018/JDM
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoglio AA, Reilly ED, Gorman JA, et al. Use of social robots in mental health and well-being research: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(7):Article ID e13322. doi: 10.2196/13322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utami D, Bickmore T. Collaborative user responses in multiparty interaction with a couples counselor robot. In: 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Daegu, South Korea; 2019. p. 294–303.
   Google Scholar
• Park S, Whang M. Empathy in human-robot interaction: designing for social robots. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3):1889. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar