Speed effects in touching behaviours: impact on perceived relationships in robot-robot interactions

References

• Dahiya A, Aroyo AM, Dautenhahn K, et al. A survey of multi-agent human-robot interaction systems. Rob Auton Syst. 2022;161:104335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan XZ, Reig S, Carter EJ, et al. From one to another: how robot-robot interaction affects users’ perceptions following a transition between robots. 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2019. p. 114–122.
   Google Scholar
• Fraune MR, Oisted BC, Sembrowski CE, et al. Effects of robot-human versus robot-robot behavior and entitativity on anthropomorphism and willingness to interact. Comput Human Behav. 2020;105:106220. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.106220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erel H, Cohen Y, Shafrir K, et al. Excluded by robots: can robot-robot-human interaction lead to ostracism? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction; 2021. p. 312–321.
   Google Scholar
• Sherif M. A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology (Columbia University), 1935.
   Google Scholar
• Asch SE. Opinions and social pressure. Sci Am. 1955;193:17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch SE. Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In: H. Guetzkow, editor. Groups, leadership, and men research in human relations; Routledge; 1951. p. 295–303.
   Google Scholar
• Iio T, Yoshikawa Y, Ishiguro H. Pre-scheduled turn-taking between robots to make conversation coherent. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction; Biopolis, Singapore; 2016. p. 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Iio T, Yoshikawa Y, Ishiguro H. Double-meaning agreements by two robots to conceal incoherent agreements to user's opinions. Adv Robot. 2021;35(19):1145–1155. doi:10.1080/01691864.2021.1974939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto D, Hayashi K, Kanda T, et al. Humanoid robots as a broadcasting communication medium in open public spaces. Int J Soc Robot. 2009;1(2):157–169. doi:10.1007/s12369-009-0015-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iio T, Yoshikawa Y, Ishiguro H. Retaining human-robots conversation: comparing single robot to multiple robots in a real event. J Adv Comput Intell Intell Inform. 2017;21(4):675–685. doi:10.20965/jaciii.2017.p0675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto T, Baba J, Nakanishi J, et al. Playful recommendation: sales promotion that robots stimulate pleasant feelings instead of product explanation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2022;7(4):11815–11822. doi:10.1109/LRA.2022.3189149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amada J, Okafuji Y, Matsumura K, et al. Investigating the crowd-drawing effect, on passersby, of pseudo-crowds using multiple robots. Adv Robot. 2023;37(6):423–432. doi:10.1080/01691864.2022.2143242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiomi M, Okumura S, Kimoto M, et al. Two is better than one: social rewards from two agents enhance offline improvements in motor skills more than single agent. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0240622. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiomi M, Tamura Y, Kimoto M, et al. Two is better than one: verification of the effect of praise from two robots on pre-school children’s learning time. Adv Robot. 2021;35(19):1132–1144. doi:10.1080/01691864.2021.1970019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura Y, Shiomi M, Kimoto M, et al. Robots as an interactive-social medium in storytelling to multiple children. Interact Stud. Soc Behav Commun Biol Artif Syst. 2021;22(1):110–140. doi:10.1075/is.18033.tam
   Google Scholar
• Iio T, Maeda R, Ogawa K, et al. Improvement of Japanese adults’ English speaking skills via experiences speaking to a robot. J Comput Assist Learn. 2019;35(2):228–245. doi:10.1111/jcal.12325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada Y, Kimoto M, Iio T, et al. Two is better than one: apologies from two robots are preferred. PLoS One. 2023;18(2):e0281604. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0281604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itahara H, Kimoto M, Iio T, et al. How does exposure to changing opinions or reaffirmation opinions influence the thoughts of observers and their trust in robot discussions? Appl Sci. 2023;13(1):585. doi:10.3390/app13010585
   Google Scholar
• Law T, Malle BF, Scheutz M. A touching connection: how observing robotic touch can affect human trust in a robot. Int J Soc Robot. 2021;13(8):2003–2019. doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00729-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada Y, Kimoto M, Iio T, et al. Kawaii emotions in presentations: viewing a physical touch affects perception of affiliative feelings of others toward an object. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0264736. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0264736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshmukh A, Craenen B, Vinciarelli A, et al. Shaping robot gestures to shape users’ perception: the effect of amplitude and speed on Godspeed ratings. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction; 2018. p. 293–300.
   Google Scholar
• Willemse CJ, Huisman G, Jung MM, et al. Observing touch from video: the influence of social cues on pleasantness perceptions. Haptics: Perception, Devices, Control, and Applications: 10th International Conference, EuroHaptics 2016; London, UK; 2016 Jul 4–7, Proceedings, Part II 10. p. 196–205.
   Google Scholar
• Blakemore S-J, Bristow D, Bird G, et al. Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision–touch synaesthesia. Brain. 2005;128(7):1571–1583. doi:10.1093/brain/awh500
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serino A, Pizzoferrato F, Làdavas E. Viewing a face (especially one's own face) being touched enhances tactile perception on the face. Psychol Sci. 2008;19(5):434–438. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02105.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirayama T, Okada Y, Kimoto M, et al. What is the speed boundary between patting and slapping by a robot? Investigating perceptions toward robot-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction; 2022. p. 212–218.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi K, Kanda T, Miyashita T, et al. Robot Manzai: robot conversation as a passive–social medium. Int J Humanoid Rob. 2008;5(01):67–86. doi:10.1142/S0219843608001315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price S, Bianchi-Berthouze N, Jewitt C, et al. The making of meaning through dyadic haptic affective touch. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact. 2022;29(3):1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapparoli L, Invernizzi P, Gandola M, et al. Like the back of the (right) hand? A new fMRI look on the hand laterality task. Exp Brain Res. 2014;232:3873–3895. doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4065-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs JS, Holbrook MB, Sheng S, et al. Are your participants gaming the system? Screening mechanical Turk workers. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Atlanta, Georgia, USA; 2010. p. 2399–2402.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer DM, Meyvis T, Davidenko N. Instructional manipulation checks: detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009;45(4):867–872. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cekaite A. Touch as embodied compassion in responses to pain and distress. In: Touch in social interaction. Routledge; 2020. p. 81–102.
   Google Scholar
• Burdelski M, Cekaite A. Control touch in caregiver–child interaction: embodied organization in triadic mediation of peer conflict in Swedish and Japanese. In: Touch in social interaction. Routledge; 2020. p. 103–123.
   Google Scholar
• Benninghoff B, Kulms P, Hoffmann L, et al. Theory of mind in human-robot-communication: appreciated or not? Kogn Syst. 2013;2013(1):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Peled-Avron L, Woolley JD. Understanding others through observed touch: neural correlates, developmental aspects, and psychopathology. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2022;43:152–158. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiomi M, Shatani K, Minato T, et al. How should a robot react before people's touch?: Modeling a pre-touch reaction distance for a robot's face. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2018;3(4):3773–3780. doi:10.1109/LRA.2018.2856303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suvilehto JT, Glerean E, Dunbar RIM, et al. Topography of social touching depends on emotional bonds between humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(45):13811–13816. doi:10.1073/pnas.1519231112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suvilehto JT, Nummenmaa L, Harada T, et al. Cross-cultural similarity in relationship-specific social touching. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci. 2019;286(2019):20190467. doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.0467
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willemse CJAM, Toet A, van Erp JBF. Affective and behavioral responses to robot-initiated social touch: toward understanding the opportunities and limitations of physical contact in human–robot interaction. Front ICT. 2017;4(12):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Alenljung B, Andreasson R, Lowe R, et al. Conveying emotions by touch to the Nao robot: a user experience perspective. Multimodal Technol Interact. 2018;2(4):82. doi:10.3390/mti2040082
   Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Shiomi M, Minato T, et al. What kinds of robot's touch will match expressed emotions? IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2019;5(1):127–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiomi M, Shatani K, Minato T, et al. Does a robot's subtle pause in reaction time to people's touch contribute to positive influences? 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN); Nanjing and Tai'an, China; 2018. p. 364–369.
   Google Scholar
• Mejía DAC, Sumioka H, Ishiguro H, et al. Evaluating gaze behaviors as pre-touch reactions for virtual agents. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1129677. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabrouk AB, Zagrouba E. Abnormal behavior recognition for intelligent video surveillance systems: a review. Expert Syst Appl. 2018;91:480–491. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pareek P, Thakkar A. A survey on video-based human action recognition: recent updates, datasets, challenges, and applications. Artif Intell Rev. 2021;54:2259–2322. doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09904-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiomi M, Nakagawa K, Shinozawa K, et al. Does a robot’s touch encourage human effort? Int J Soc Robot. 2017;9:5–15. doi:10.1007/s12369-016-0339-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishiguchi S, Ogawa K, Yoshikawa Y, et al. Theatrical approach: designing human-like behaviour in humanoid robots. Rob Auton Syst. 2017;89:158–166. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2016.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuoco E. Could a robot become a successful actor? The case of Geminoid F. Acta Univ Lodz Folia Litteraria Polonica. 2022;65(2):203–219. doi:10.18778/1505-9057.65.11
   Google Scholar
• Cooney M, Shiomi M, Duarte EK, et al. A broad view on robot self-defense: rapid scoping review and cultural comparison. Robotics. 2023;12(2):43. doi:10.3390/robotics12020043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto D, Ishiguro H. Geminoid: remote-controlled android system for studying human presence. Kansei Eng Int. 2009;8(1):3–9. doi:10.5057/ER081218-1
   Google Scholar
• Glas DF, Minato T, Ishi CT, et al. Erica: the Erato intelligent conversational android. 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN); New York, NY, USA; 2016. p. 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Shiomi M, Sumioka H, Sakai K, et al. SŌTO: An android platform with a masculine appearance for social touch interaction. Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction; Cambridge, UK; 2020. p. 447–449.
   Google Scholar
• Yu R, Hui E, Lee J, et al. Use of a therapeutic, socially assistive pet robot (Paro) in improving mood and stimulating social interaction and communication for people with dementia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015;4(2):e4189.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida N, Yonemura S, Emoto M, et al. Production of character animation in a home robot: a case study of lovot. Int J Soc Robot. 2022;14(1):39–54. doi:10.1007/s12369-021-00746-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar