Assessment of phenol-formaldehyde adhesive distribution on the strand surface by light microscopy

References

• Pham VT, Biziks V, Mai C. Effects of low and high molecular weight of phenol-formaldehyde (PF) on the properties of strand boards from kiri wood (Paulownia tomentosa). Wood Mater Sci Eng. 2021;17(4):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Pham VT, Schöpper C, Klüppel A, et al. Effect of wood and panel density on the properties of lightweight strand boards. Wood Mater Sci Eng. 2019;16(3):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Stamm AJ, Seborg RM. Resin-treated plywood. Ind Eng Chem. 1939;31(7):897–902. doi:10.1021/ie50355a023.
   Google Scholar
• Grinins J, Biziks V, Marais B, et al. Weathering stability and durability of birch plywood modified with different molecular weight phenol-formaldehyde oligomers. Polymers. 2021;13(2):175. doi:10.3390/polym13020175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes RF, Júnior GB, de Almeida NF, et al. Effect of thermal treatment on properties of OSB panels. Wood Sci Technol. 2013;47(2):243–256. doi:10.1007/s00226-012-0494-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bufalino L, Ribeiro Corrêa AA, de Sá VA, et al. Alternative compositions of oriented strand boards (OSB) made with commercial woods produced in Brazil. Maderas Cienc Tecnol. 2015;17:105–116. doi:10.4067/S0718-221X2015005000011.
   Google Scholar
• Park B-D, Riedl B, Hsu EW, et al. Effects of weight average molecular mass of phenol-formaldehyde adhesives on medium density fiberboard performance. Holz als Roh-Werkstoff. 1998;56(3):155–161. doi:10.1007/s001070050289.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Gardner DJ, Muszynski L. Ultrasonic atomization of pMDI wood resin. Wood Fiber Sci. 2009;41:84–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann WF. Resin efficiency in particleboard as influenced by density, atomization and resin content. Forest Prod J. 1970;20:48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Xing C, Riedl B, Cloutier A, et al. Characterization of urea–formaldehyde resin penetration into medium density fiberboard fibers. Wood Sci Technol. 2005;39(5):374–384. doi:10.1007/s00226-005-0294-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakdel H, Cyr P-L, Riedl B, et al. Quantification of urea formaldehyde resin in wood fibers using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Wood Sci Technol. 2008;42(2):133–148. doi:10.1007/s00226-007-0155-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens RS, Kutscha NP. Effect of resin molecular weight on bonding flakeboard. Wood Fiber Sci. 2007;19:353–361.
   Google Scholar
• Mahrdt E, van Herwijnen HW, Kantner W, et al. Adhesive distribution related to mechanical performance of high density wood fibre board. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2017;78:23–27. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahrdt E, Stöckel F, van Herwijnen HW, et al. Light microscopic detection of UF adhesive in industrial particle board. Wood Sci Technol. 2015;49(3):517–526. doi:10.1007/s00226-015-0715-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris JL, Kamke FA, Mbachu R, et al. Phenol formaldehyde adhesives formulated for advanced X-ray imaging in wood-composite bondlines. J Mater Sci. 2014;49(2):580–591. doi:10.1007/s10853-013-7738-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riegler M, Gindl-Altmutter W, Hauptmann M, et al. Detection of UF resin on wood particles and in particleboards: potential of selected methods for practice-oriented offline detection. Eur J Wood Prod. 2012;70(6):829–837. doi:10.1007/s00107-012-0628-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans PD, Lube V, Averdunk H, et al. Visualizing the microdistribution of zinc borate in oriented strand board using X-ray microcomputed tomography and SEM-EDX. J Compos. 2015;2015:1–9. doi:10.1155/2015/630905.
   Google Scholar
• Furuno T, Imamura Y, Kajita H. The modification of wood by treatment with low molecular weight phenol-formaldehyde resin: a properties enhancement with neutralized phenolic-resin and resin penetration into wood cell wall. Wood Sci Technol. 2004;37(5):349–361. doi:10.1007/s00226-003-0176-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueden CT, Schindelin J, Hiner MC, et al. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18(1):529. doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–682. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar