Concurrent effect of phosphorus, nanoparticles and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria influences root morphology, soil enzymes and nutrients uptake in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)

References

• Ahmed, M., M. J. Patil, F. Natsia, and V. Yadav. 2008. Effect of phosphorus use efficiency in tropical rice. Journal of Microorganism 12 (7):45–7.
   Google Scholar
• Akinrinde, E. A., and T. Gaizer. 2006. Differences in the performance and phosphorus-use efficiency of some tropical rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 5 (3):206–11. doi: 10.3923/pjn.2006.206.211.
   Google Scholar
• Amanullah, Inamullah Jawaher, A., S. E. Mohamed, S. A. Mona, M. I. Asim, and K. Shah. 2020. Phosphorus and zinc fertilization improve productivity and profitability of rice cultivars under rice-wheat system. Agronomy 10 (8):1085.
   Google Scholar
• Arora, R. K., M. Iqbal, A. Hamid, K. Iqbal, A. Hussain, and A. Rasool. 2016. Influence of phosphorus and phosphate solubilizing bacteria to physico-chemical soil characteristics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). In: Natural Resource Management: Ecological Perspectives (I), edited by Peshin, R., Dhawan, A. K., Bano, F. and Risam, K. S. Proceedings of the Indian Ecological Society International Conference, SKUAST, India, 18-20th February (p. 666).
   Google Scholar
• Casida, L. E., JR., D. A. Klein, and T. Santoro. 1964. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Science 98 (6):371–6. doi: 10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhary, I. J., and V. Singh. 2020. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles and its impact on growth, biomass and yield of agricultural crops under environmental stress: A review. Research Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 10 (1):1–8. doi: 10.3923/rjnn.2020.1.8.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, H. F. 1964. Interaction of factors affecting yield. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 15 (1):409–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.15.060164.002205.
   Google Scholar
• Counce, P. A., and B. R. Wells. 1986. Rice Y‐leaf nutrient analyses and midseason, foliar fertilization. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 17 (10):1071–87. doi: 10.1080/00103628609367775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Costa, M. V. J., and P. K. Sharma. 2016. Effect of copperoxide nanoparticles on growth, morphology, photosynthesis, and antioxidant response in Oryza sativa. Photosynthetica 54 (1):110–9. doi: 10.1007/s11099-015-0167-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daghan, H. 2018. Effects of TiO2 nanoparticles on maize (Zea mays L.) growth, chlorophyll content and nutrient uptake. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 16:6873–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangi, K., and A. K., Verma. 2021. Efficient & eco-friendly smart nano-pesticides: Emerging prospects for agriculture. Materials Today: Proceedings 45: 3819–3824. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.211.
   Google Scholar
• Devi, K. N., M. S. Singh, N. G. Singh, and H. S. Athokpam. 2011. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivumL.). Journal of Crop and Weed 7 (2):23–7.
   Google Scholar
• Dubey, K. K., and M. H. Fulekar. 2011. Mycorhizosphere development and management: The role of nutrients, microorganisms and bio-chemical activities. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 2 (2):315–24. doi: 10.5251/abjna.2011.2.2.315.324.
   Google Scholar
• Eichert, T., A. Kurtz, U. Steiner, and H. E. Goldbach. 2008. Size exclusion limits and lateral heterogeneity of the stomatal foliar uptake pathway for aqueous solutes and water-suspended nanoparticles. Physiologia Plantarum 134 (1):151–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01135.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichert, T., and H. E. Goldbach. 2008. Equivalent pore radii of hydrophilic foliar uptake routes in stomatous and astomatous leaf surfaces- further evidence for a stomatal pathway. Physiologia Plantarum 132 (4):491–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01023.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eivazi, F., and M. A. Tabatabai. 1979. Phosphatase in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 9 (3):167–72. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(77)90070-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fageria, N. K., and V. C. Baligar. 2003. Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Advance Agronomy 88:97–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fageria, N. K., R. J. Wright, and V. C. Baligar. 2014. Rice cultivar evaluation for phosphorus use efficiency. Plant and Soil 111 (1):105–9. doi: 10.1007/BF02182043.
   Google Scholar
• Fageria, N. K., V. C. Baligar, and C. A. Jones. 2011. Growth and mineral nutrition of field crops, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fayez, R., and D. Mahmoud. 2009. Solubilization of inorganic phosphate by microorganisms isolated from forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 24:389–95.
   Google Scholar
• Gaind, S. 2013. Pseudomonas striata for improving phosphorus availability in soil under pearl millet cultivation. Journal of Crop Improvement 27 (3):255–71. doi: 10.1080/15427528.2012.760026.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, K. A., and A. A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. In An international rice research institute book, 2nd ed. New York: A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Halli, H. M., S. Angadi, A. Kumar, P. Govindasamy, R. Madar, D. O. El-Ansary, M. A. Rashwan, S. A. M. Abdelmohsen, A. M. M. Abdelbacki, E. A. Mahmoud, et al. 2021. Influence of planting and irrigation levels as physical methods on maize root morphological traits, grain yield and water productivity in semi-arid region. Agronomy 11 (2):294. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11020294.
   Google Scholar
• Halli, H. M., S. S. Angadi, and R. H. Patil. 2016. Water and nutrient use efficiency in agriculture and the role of cereals- A review. Journal of Farm Science 29 (3):299–306.
   Google Scholar
• Hatti, V., M. Raghavendra, Y. V. Singh, S. K. Sharma, H. M. Halli, and B. R. Goud. 2020. Application of nano technology in crop production to enhance resource use efficiency with special reference to soil and water conservation: A review. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 19 (4):375–81. doi: 10.5958/2455-7145.2020.00050.8.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, A. M., S. Heuer, J. T. Thomson, and M. Wissuwa. 2007. Genetic and genomic approaches to develop rice germplasm for problem soils. Plant Molecular Biology 65 (4):547–70. doi: 10.1007/s11103-007-9215-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis, 498. New Delhi: Prentice Hall India PVT Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, J., F. Caravaca, L. Carrasco, and A. Roldán. 2007. Interactions between a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium on AM fungus and a phosphate solubilizing fungus in the rhizosphere of Lactuca sativa. Applied Soil Ecology 35 (3):480–7. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2006.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, W., and W. Norvell. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test zinc, iron manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42 (3):421–8. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, J. P. 2007. Roots of the second green revolution. Australian Journal of Botany 55 (5):493–512. doi: 10.1071/BT06118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahua, B., K. R. Raj, and M. Debtanu. 2010. Root characteristics of maize as influenced by various phosphatic chemical fertilizers and bio-fertilizers. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 56 (6):681–95. doi: 10.1080/03650340903207915.
   Google Scholar
• Mankad, M., R. S. Fougat, A. Patel, P. Mankad, G. Patil, and N. N. Subhash. 2017. Physiological and biochemical effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on rice (Oryza sativa L.). Advances in Bioresearch 8 (6):208–17.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D., P. Adhikari, R. Djebaili, P. Thathola, K. Joshi, M. Pellegrini, N. O. Adeyemi, B. Khoshru, K. Kaur, A. Priyadarshini, et al. 2023. Biosynthesis and characterization of nanoparticles, its advantages, various aspects and risk assessment to maintain the sustainable agriculture: Emerging technology in modern era science. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry: PPB 196:103–20. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.01.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghaddasi, S., A. Fotovat, A. H. Khoshgoftarmanesh, F. Karimzadeh, H. R. Khazaei, and R. Khorassani. 2017. Bioavailability of coated and uncoated ZnO nanoparticles to cucumber in soil with or without organic matter. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 144:543–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-de-Luque, A. 2017. Interaction of nanomaterial’s with plants: What do we need for real applications in agriculture? Frontiers in Environmental Science 5:12. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piper, C. S. 1966. Soil and plant analysis, 14–32. New York, NY: University of Adelaide, Australia Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, T. N. K. V., P. Sudhakar, Y. Sreenivasulu, P. Latha, V. Munaswamy, K. R. Reddy, T. S. Sreeprasad, P. R. Sajanlal, and T. Pradeep. 2012. Effect of nanoscale zinc oxide particles on the germination, growth and yield of Peanut. Journal of Plant Nutrition 35 (6):905–27. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2012.663443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qurban, A. P., O. Radziah, A. R. Zaharah, and R. Modh. 2011. Effect of phosphatic fertilizer on root colonization of aerobic rice by phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Ipcbee 9 (1):89–93.
   Google Scholar
• Raliya, R., J. C., Tarafdar, H., Mahawar, R., Kumar, P., Gupta, T., Mathur, R. K., Kaul, A., Kalia, R., Gautam, S. K., Singh, & H. S., Gehlot. 2014. ZnO nanoparticles induced exopolysaccharide production by B. subtilis strain JCT1 for arid soil applications. International Journal of Biological macromolecules 65:362–368. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.01.060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rameshraddy, Pavithra, G. J., B. H. Rajashekar Reddy, M. Salimath, K. N. Geetha, and A. G. Shankar. 2017. Zinc oxide nano particles increases Zn uptake, translocation in rice with positive effect on growth, yield and moisture stress tolerance. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 22:287–294.
   Google Scholar
• Rameshraddy, M., Salimath, K. N. Geetha, and A. G. Shankar. 2018. ZnO nanoparticle improves maize growth, yield and seed zinc under high soil pH condition. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7 (12):1593–1601. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.712.187.
   Google Scholar
• Rehman, H. U., T. Aziz, M. Farooq, A. Wakeel, and Z. Rengel. 2012. Zinc nutrition in rice production systems: A review. Plant and Soil 361 (1-2):203–26. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1346-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizwan, M., M. S. Ali, M. F. Qayyum, Y. S. Adrees, M. Ok, M. Ibrahim, M. Z. Rehman, M. Farid, and F. Abbas. 2017. Effect of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles on growth and physiology of globally important food crops: A critical review. Journal of Hazardous Materials 322 (Pt A):2–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samart, S., N. Phakamas, and S. Chutipaijit. 2015. Effect of nanoparticles on the relationship between crop growth rate and yield of chainat-1 rice (Oryza sativa L.). 2nd International Symposium on Agricultural Technology (ISAT).
   Google Scholar
• Subbiah, B. V., and G. L. Asija. 1956. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science 25:259–60.
   Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, J. C., R. Raliya, H. Mahawar, and I. Rathore. 2014. Development of zinc nano fertilizer to enhance crop production in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum). Agricultural Research 3 (3):257–62. doi: 10.1007/s40003-014-0113-y.
   Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, J. C., Y. Xiang, W. N. Wang, Q. Dong, and P. Biswas. 2012. Standardization of size, shape and concentration of nanoparticle for plant application. Applied Biological Research 14:138–44.
   Google Scholar
• Trivedi, P., B. Kumar, A. Pandey, and L. M. S. Palni. 2007. Growth promotion of rice by phosphate solubilizing bioinoculants in a Himalayan location. In Proceedings books of first international meeting on microbial phosphate solubilization, ed. E., Velazquez and C. Rodriguez-Barrueco, 291–9. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Noordwijk, M. 1993. Roots length, biomass, production and mortality. Methods for root research. In Trop.Soil.Boil. fert., A handbook of methods, ed. J. M. Anderson and J. S. I. Ingram, 132–44. Wallingford: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. L., T. Fang, C. O. Dimkpa, D. W. Britt, J. E. McLean, A. Jacobson, and A. J. Anderson. 2015. The phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles on wheat varies with soil properties. Biometals: An International Journal on the Role of Metal Ions in Biology, Biochemistry, and Medicine 28 (1):101–12. doi: 10.1007/s10534-014-9806-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, Z., N. Waseem, R. Zahra, H. Lee, M. A. Badshah, A. Mehmood, H. K. Choi, and M. Arshad. 2017. Growth and metabolic responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivated in phosphorus-deficient soil amended with TiO2 nanoparticles. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65 (28):5598–606. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L., F. Hong, S. Lu, and C. Liu. 2005. Effect of nano-TiO2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of Spinach. Biological Trace Element Research 104 (1):83–92. doi: 10.1385/BTER:104:1:083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar