Advanced search
Publication Cover
Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics Volume 28, 2008 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,155
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
EVIDENCE TO PRACTICE COMMENTARY

Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in Infants at Dual Risk for Motor Delays

Patricia Snyder Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA; University of Florida, College of Education,Correspondence[email protected]
, PhD,
Jane M. Eason Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA; Department of Physical Therapy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-New Orleans,
, PT, PhD,
Darbi Philibert Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA; , New Orleans, LA
, MHS, LOTR,
Andrea Ridgway Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA; Autism Spectrum Therapies, Arcadia, CA
, PhD &
Tiffany McCaughey Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA; University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
, MHS
Pages 267-282 | Published online: 10 Jul 2009

REFERENCES

  • Bartlett D. J., Fanning J. E. K. Use of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale to characterize the motor development of infants born preterm at eight months corrected age. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 2003; 23(4)31–45
  • Blanchard Y., Neilan E., Busanich J., Garavuso L., Klimas D. Inter-rater reliability of early intervention providers scoring the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Pediatric Physical Therapy 2004; 16: 13–18
  • Campbell S. The child's development of functional movement. Physical therapy for children, 2nded., S. K. Campbell, D. W. Vander Linden, R. J. Palisano. Saunders, Philadelphia 2000; 3–44
  • Case-Smith J. Analysis of current motor development theory and recently published infant motor assessments. Infants and Young Children 1996; 9(1)29–41
  • Cintas H. L. Cross-cultural similarities and differences in development and the impact of parental expectations on motor behavior. Pediatric Physical Therapy 1995; 7: 103–111
  • Cohen E., Boettcher K., Maher T., Phillips A., Terrel L., Nixon-Cave K., Shepard K. Evaluation of the Peabody Developmental Gross Motor Scales for young children of African American and Hispanic ethnic background. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 1999; 11: 191–197
  • Coster W. Critique of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 1995; 15: 53–69
  • Darrah Redfern, Maguire Beaulne, Watt. Intra-individual stability of rate of gross motor development in full-term infants. Early Human Development. 1998; 52: 169–179
  • Folio M. R., Fewell R. R. Peabody developmental motor scales: Examiner's manual., 2nd ed. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 2000
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Amendments of 1997, 20 U. S. C. § 1400 et seq. (Supp. III 1997)
  • Jeng S. F., Yau K. I. T., Chen L. C., Hsiao S. F. Alberta Infant Motor Scale: Reliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Taiwan. Physical Therapy 2000; 80: 168–178
  • Liao P. J. M., Campbell S. K. Examination of the item structure of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Pediatric Physical Therapy 2004; 16: 31–38
  • Malina R. M. Racial/ethnic variation in the motor development and performance of American children. Canadian Journal of Sport Science 1988; 13(2)136–143
  • Piper M. C., Darrah J. Motor assessment of the developing infant. Saunders, Philadelphia 1994
  • Piper M. C., Pinnell L. E., Darrah J., Maguire T., Byrne P. J. Construction and validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Canadian Journal of Public Health 1992; 83(Suppl. 2)S46–S50
  • Sameroff A. J. Early influences on development: Fact or fancy?. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development 1975; 21: 267–294
  • Snyder P., Lawson S., Thompson B., Stricklin S., Sexton D. Evaluating the psychometric integrity of instruments used in early intervention research: The Battelle Developmental Inventory. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 1993; 13(2)216–232
  • Thompson B. Score reliability: Contemporary thinking on reliability issues. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2003
  • U. S. Bureau of the Census. Statistical abstract of the United States, 117th ed. U. S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 1997

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.