1,660
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

A Systematic Review of the Predictive Validity of Neurobehavioral Assessments During the Preterm Period

&
Pages 292-307 | Received 24 May 2015, Accepted 29 Feb 2016, Published online: 17 Jun 2016

REFERENCES

  • Als, H. (1982). Toward a synactive theory of development: Promise for the assessment and support of infant individuality. Infant Mental Health Journal, 3, 229–243.
  • Als, H. (1984). Manual for the naturalistic observation of newborn behavior (preterm and full term). Boston, MA: The Children's Hospital.
  • Als, H., Butler, S., Kosta, S., & McAnulty, G. (2005). The Assessment of Preterm Infants’ Behavior (APIB): Furthering the understanding and measurement of neurodevelopmental competence in preterm and full-term infants. Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 11, 94–102.
  • Amiel-Tison, C. (1973). A method for neurologic evaluation within the first year of life. Current Problems in Pediatrics, 7, 3–50.
  • Aylward, G.P. (1995). The Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Bayley, N. (1993). Bayley Scales of Infant Development (2nded). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Baley, J. & Leonard, E. (2013). Infections in the neonate. In M. Klaus & A. Fanaroff (Eds.), Care of the high-risk neonate (p. 346–367). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.
  • Behrman, R. & Butler, A. (Eds). (2007). Preterm birth: Causes, consequences, and prevention. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Benfer, K., Weir, K., & Boyd, R. (2012). Clinimetrics of measures of oropharyngeal dysphagia for preschool children with cerebral palsy and neurodevelopmental disabilities: A systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 54, 784–795.
  • Bhutta, A. & Anand, K. (2002). Vulnerability of the developing brain: Neuronal mechanisms. Clinical Perinatology, 29, 357–372.
  • Brazelton, B. (1973). Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale. London, UK: Spastics International Medical Publications.
  • Brazelton, T. (1978). The Brazelton Neonatal Behavior Assessment Scale: Introduction. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 43, 1–13.
  • Brown, N. & Spittle, A. (2014). Neurobehavioral evaluation in the preterm and term infant. Current Pediatric Reviews, 10, 65–72.
  • Bruininks, H. (1978). Bruininks Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. Circle Pines, MN: AGS Publishing.
  • Burger, M. & Louw, Q. (2009). The predictive validity of general movements: A systematic review. European Journal of Pediatric Neurology, 13, 408–420.
  • Campbell, S. (1999). Test–retest reliability of the test of infant motor performance. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 11, 60–66.
  • Cioni, G., Ferrari, F., Einspieler, C., Paolicelli, P., Barbani, M., & Prechtl, H. (1997). Comparison between observation of spontaneous movements and neurological examination in preterm infants. Journal of Pediatrics, 130, 705–712.
  • Constantinou, J., Adamson-Macedo, E., Mirmiran, M., Mirmiran, M., & Fleisher, B. (2007). Movement, imaging, and neurobehavioral assessment as predictors of cerebral palsy in preterm infants. Journal of Perinatology, 27, 225–229.
  • Constantinou, J., Adamson-Macedo, E., Mirmiran, M., Ariago, R., & Fleisher, B. (2005). Neurobehaviral assessment predicts differential outcome between VLBW and ELBW preterm infants. Journal of Perinatology, 25, 788–793.
  • Darsaklis, V., Snider, L., Majnemer, A., & Mazer, B. (2011). Predictive validity of Prechtl's method on the qualitative assessment of general movements: A systematic review of the evidence. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 53, 896–906.
  • Dubowitz, L. & Dubowitz, V. (1981). The Neurological Assessment of the Preterm and Full-term Infant. London, UK: Heinemann.
  • Fawcett, J. & Garity, J. (2009). Evaluating research for evidence-based nursing. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.
  • Fanaroff, A. & Klaus, M. (2013). The physical environment. In M. Klaus & A. Fanaroff (Eds.), Care of the high-risk neonate (pp. 132–145). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.
  • Finkel, R., Hynan, S., Glanzman, A., Owens, H., Nelson, L., Cone, S., … & Iannaccone, S. (2008). The test of infant motor performance: Reliability in spinal muscular atrophy Type I. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 20, 242–246.
  • Flegel, J. & Kolobe, T. (2002). Predictive validity of the test of infant motor performance by the Bruininks–Oseretsky test of motor proficiency at school age. Physical Therapy, 82, 762–771.
  • Fletcher, R., Fletcher, S., & Wagner, E. (1996). Clinical epidemiology: The essentials. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
  • Garcia, J., Gherpelli, J., & Leone, C. (2004). The role of spontaneous general movement assessment in the neurological outcome of cerebral lesions in preterm infants. Jornal de Pediatria, 80, 296–304.
  • Grunau, R. (2013). Neonatal pain in very preterm infants: Long-term effects on brain, neurodevelopment and pain reactivity. Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal, 44, e0025.
  • Haley, S., Coster, W., Ludlow, L., Haltiwanger, J., & Andrellos, P. (1992). Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Boston, MA: New England Medical Centre Hospitals.
  • Harijaan, P., Beer, C., Glazebrook, C., Israel, C., Marlow, N., Whitelaw, A., & Johnson, S. (2012). Predicting developmental outcomes in very preterm infants: Validity of a neonatal neurobehavioral assessment. ActaPediatrica, 101, e275–e281.
  • IMPS. (2010). The Test of Infant Motor Performance and the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test. Retrieved from http://thetimp.com/.
  • Jobe, A. (2010). Miracle extremely low birth weight neonates: Examples of developmental plasticity. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 116, 1184–1189.
  • Kim, S., Lee, Y., & Lee, Y. (2011). Predictive value of test of infant motor performance for infants based on correlation between TIMP and Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Annals of Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine, 35, 860–866.
  • Korner, A. (1996). Reliable individual differences in preterm infants' excitation management. Child Development, 67, 1793–1805.
  • Kostovic, I. & Rakic, P. (1990). Developmental history of the transient subplate zone in the visual and somatosensory cortex of the macaque monkey and human brain. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 297, 441–470.
  • Macaskill, P., Gatsonis, C., Deeks, J., Harbord, R., & Takwoingi, Y. (2010). Chapter 10: Analyzing and presenting results. In J. Deeks, P. Bossuyt, C. Gatsonis (Eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 1.0 (p. 1–61). Retrieved from: http://srdta.cochrane.org/.
  • Majnemer, A. & Mazer, B. (1998). Neurologic evaluation of the newborn infant: Definition and psychometric properties. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 40, 708–715.
  • Majnemer, A. & Snider, L. (2005). A comparison of developmental assessments of the newborn and young infant. Mental Retardation & Developmental Disability Research Reviews, 11, 68–73.
  • Manacero, S., Marschik, P., Nunes, M., & Einspieler, C. (2012). Is it possible to predict the infant's neurodevelopmental outcome at 14 months of age by means of a single preterm assessment of general movements? Early Human Development, 88, 39–43.
  • March of Dimes. (2009). White paper on preterm birth. The global and regional toll. Retrieved from https://www.shef.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.85389!/file/March-of-Dimes-Pre-term-Birth-White-Paper.pdf.
  • Martin, R. & Crowley, M. (2013). Respiratory problems. In M. Klaus & A. Fanaroff (Eds.), Care of the high-risk neonate (p. 244–269). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D.G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6, e1000097.
  • Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Patrick, D., Alonso, J., Stratford, P., Knol, D., Bouter, L., & deVet, H. (2010a). International consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health‐related patient‐reported outcomes: Results of the COSMIN study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 737–745.
  • Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Patrick, D., Alonso, J., Stratford, P., Knol, D., Bouter, L., Patrick, D., & deVet, H. (2010b). COSMIN Checklist Manual. Retrieved from http://www. cosmin.nl/images/upload/files/COSMIN%20checklist%20manual%20v9.pdf.
  • Nakajima, Y., Einspieler, C., Marschik, P., Bos, A., & Prechtl, H. (2006). Does a detailed assessment of poor repertoire general movements help to identify those infants who will develop normally? Early Human Development, 82, 53–59.
  • NICHD Neonatal Research Network. (2014). Extremely preterm birth outcome. Retrieved from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/about/org/der/branches/ppb/programs/epbo/Pages/dataShow.aspx.
  • Noble, Y. & Boyd, R. (2011). Neonatal assessments for the preterm infant up to 4 months corrected age: A systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 54, 129–139.
  • Ohgi, S., Arisawa, K., Takahashi, T., Kusumoto, T., Goto, Y., Akiyama, T., & Saito, H. (2003). Neonatal Behavioural Assessment Scale as a predictor of later developmental disabilities of low birth weight and / or premature infants. Brain & Development, 25, 313–321.
  • Oskoui, M., Coutinho, F., Dykeman, J., Jettén, N., & Pringsheim, T. (2013). An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 55, 509–519.
  • Piper, M.C, & Darrah, J. (1994). Motor assessment of the developing infant. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Company.
  • Portney, L.G. & Watkins, M.P. (2009). Foundation of clinical research: Applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Prechtl, H. (1977). The neurological examination of the full-term newborn infant. London, UK: Heineman.
  • Prechtl, H. & Bos, A. (2005). Prechtl's method on the qualitative assessment of General Movements in preterm, term and young infants. London, UK: Mac Keith Press.
  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Saint-Anne Dargassies, S. (1977). Neurological development in the full-term and pre-term neonate. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
  • Sanderson, S. (2007). Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: A systematic review and annotated bibliography. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36, 666–676.
  • Smart, A. (2006). A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1–6.
  • Sweeney, J. & Blackburn, S. (2013). Neonatal physiological and behavioral stress during neurological assessment. Journal of Perinatal Neonatal Nursing, 27, 242–252.
  • Teplin, S., Burchinal, M., Johnson-Martin, N., Humphry, R., & Kraybill, E. (1991). Neurodevelopmental, health, and growth status at age 6 years of children with birth weights less than 1001 grams. Journal of Pediatrics, 118, 768–77.
  • Tsai, S., Chen, C., & Lin, M. (2010). Prediction for developmental delay on Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale in preterm infants without brain lesions. Pediatrics International, 52, 65–68.
  • Vaccarino, F. & Ment, L. (2004). Injury and repair in the developing brain. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal Edition, 89, F190–F192.
  • Vries, N. & Bos, A. (2010). The quality of General Movements in the first ten days of life in preterm infants. Early Human Development, 86, 225–229.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.