Facilitating Online Participatory Planning During the COVID-19 Pandemic

References

• Afzalan, N., & Muller, B. (2018). Online participatory technologies: opportunities and challenges for enriching participatory planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 84(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1434010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzai, Y., & Simon, H. A. (1979). The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86(2), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.86.2.124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. (833261; Vol. 1–2). Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, J., & Legacy, C. (2023). Between virtue and profession: Theorising the rise of professionalised public participation practitioners. Planning Theory, 22(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952221107148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M. (2021). The digital transformation of planning. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(4), 593–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083211016122
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S., Coleman, K., & Tapper, J. E. (2022). Bringing the forest home: Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic about e-planning in community forestry contexts. Journal of Forestry, 120(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvab049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bens, I. (2012). Facilitating with ease! Core skills for facilitators, team leaders and members, managers, consultants, and trainers (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, P., Durrant, A., McHenry, J., McKay, S., & Wilson, A. (2022). A “planning revolution” or an “attack on planning” in England: Digitization, digitalization, and democratization. International Planning Studies, 27(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2021.1979942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209104824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Quick, K., Schively Slotterback, C., & Crosby, B. C. (2013). Designing public participation processes. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, W., & Goldstein, B. (2010). The US fire learning network: Springing a rigidity trap through multiscalar collaborative networks. Ecology and Society, 15(3), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03437-150321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315. https://doi.org/10.2307/1466699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, M., & Evans-Cowley, J. (2006). E-participation in planning: An analysis of cities adopting on-line citizen participation tools. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(3), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1k
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, M., & Evans-Cowley, J. (2010). The e-citizen in planning: U.S. municipalities’ views of who participates online. In C. Silva (Ed.), Handbook of research on e-planning: ICTs for urban development and monitoring (pp. 218–236). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3.ch011
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, M., & Gordon, S. (2004). Utility of interactive computer-based materials for enhancing public participation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964056042000189781
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, C. (2016). The chaordic stepping stones: A planning tool for designing participatory processes. https://www.chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Chaordic-Stepping-Stones-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Creighton, J. L. (2005). The public participation handbook: Making better decisions through citizen involvement (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cucinotta, D., & Vanelli, M. (2020). WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Bio-Medica: Atenei Parmensis, 91(1), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daniel, C., & Pettit, C. (2021). Digital disruption and planning: Use of data and digital technology by professional planners, and perceptions of change to planning work. Australian Planner, 57(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2021.1920995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayton, K. (2020). March 17). Ige suspends public meetings and records laws as part of response. Honolulu Star-Advertiser. https://www.staradvertiser.com/2020/03/17/hawaii-news/ige-suspends-public-meetings-and-records-laws-as-part-of-response/
   Google Scholar
• Desouza, K., & Smith, K. L. (2016). Big data and planning. Planning Advisory Service Report 585. American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, K. L., Glick, D., Godinez Puig, L., & Palmer, M. (2022). Still muted: The limited participatory democracy of Zoom public meetings. Urban Affairs Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211070494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans-Cowley, J., & Conroy, M. (2004). E-government. Planning Advisory Service Report 525. American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Cowley, J., & Conroy, M. (2006). The growth of e-government in municipal planning. Journal of Urban Technology, 13(1), 81–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630730600752892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans-Cowley, J., & Griffin, G. (2012). Microparticipation with social media for community engagement in transportation planning. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2307(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.3141/2307-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans-Cowley, J., & Kitchen, J. (2011). E-government: Revised edition. Planning Advisory Service Report 564. American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, B., Fox, S. E. (2022). Access under duress: Pandemic-era lessons on digital participation and datafication in civic engagement. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(GROUP), 14:1––14:22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492833
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2009). Dealing with differences: Dramas of mediating public disputes. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2016). The challenge of transformative learning: Mining practice stories to study collaboration and dispute resolution strategies. The Challenges of Collaboration in Environmental Governance. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781785360404/9781785360404.00027.xml
   Google Scholar
• Frediani, A. A., & Cociña, C. (2019). “Participation as planning”: Strategies from the South to challenge the limits of planning. Built Environment, 45(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.45.2.143
   Google Scholar
• Goode, C. (2021). Pandemics and planning: Immediate-, medium- and long(er)-term implications of the current coronavirus crisis on planning in Britain. Town Planning Review, 92(3), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300104
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado, P., Hitchings, B. G., & Rouse, D. C. (2021). Smart cities: Integrating technology, community, and nature. Planning Advisory Service Report 599. American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Jeer, S. (1997). Online resources for planners. Planning Advisory Service Report 474/475. American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. A., Acedo, A., & Robinson, P. J. (2020). Canadian smart cities: Are we wiring new citizen-local government interactions? The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 64(3), 402–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaner, S. (2014). Facilitator’s guide to participatory decision-making. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R. E. (2012). E-planning: Retrospect and prospect. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 1(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2012010101
   Google Scholar
• Lipmanowicz, H., & McCandless, K. (2014). The surprising power of liberating structures: Simple rules to unleash a culture of innovation (Illustrated edition). Liberating Structures Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, K., Adler, P., & Milner, N. (1997). Participating the public: Group process, politics, and planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16(3), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9701600302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, K., Thomas, R. L., & Kaylor, C. (2012). Planning and broadband: Infrastructure, policy, and sustainability. Planning Advisory Service Report 569. American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Meenar, M., & Afzalan, N. (2023). Urban planners’ roles, perceptions, needs, and concerns in smart city planning: A survey of U.S. planners. International Planning Studies, 28(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2022.2136628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendenhall, A., Hempel, C., Risinger, E., & Grigsby, S. (2017). Creating planning documents. Planning Advisory Service Report 589. American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Milz, D. (2022). The hidden benefits of facilitated dialogue. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 42(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18798903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milz, D., & Gervich, C. D. (2021). Participation and the pandemic: How planners are keeping democracy alive, online. Town Planning Review, 92(3), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mualam, N., Israel, E., & Max, D. (2022). Moving to online planning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An assessment of Zoom and the impact of ICT on planning boards’ discussions. Journal of Planning Education and Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X221105811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murchison, A., Estep, T. (2021, December 23). Cities consider more virtual meetings amid COVID-19 surge. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. https://www.ajc.com/neighborhoods/north-fulton/cities-consider-more-virtual-meetings-amid-covid-19-surge/FQEKERVVHBBMNFDXAOUWTNQXW4/
   Google Scholar
• Ormerod, E., & Davoudi, S. (2021). Governing the pandemic: Democracy at the time of emergency. Town Planning Review, 92(3), 323–327. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozawa, C. P., Shmueli, D. F., & Kaufman, S. (2017). Process design decisions in community-based collaboration: Implications for implementation and collateral social benefits. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(3), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1321777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokharel, A., Milz, D., & Gervich, C. D. (2022). Planning for dissent. Journal of the American Planning Association, 88(1), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2021.1920845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, R. (2020). Is a new “Planning 3.0” paradigm emerging? Exploring the relationship between digital technologies and planning theory and practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 21(2), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1748699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, K., & Bryson, J. M. (2022). Public participation. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook of theories of governance (1st ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Quick, K., & Sandfort, J. (2014). Learning to facilitate deliberation: Practicing the art of hosting. Critical Policy Studies, 8(3), 300–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2014.912959
   Google Scholar
• Rhoads, M. (2010). Face-to-face and computer-mediated communication: What does theory tell us and what have we learned so far? Journal of Planning Literature, 25(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412210382984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, P., & Johnson, P. A. (2021). Pandemic-driven technology adoption: Public decision makers need to tread cautiously. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 10(2), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.20210401.oa5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1973). Beyond the stable state (1st ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1991). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (2001). Displacement of concepts. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuman, S. (Ed.). (2005). The IAF handbook of group facilitation: Best practices from the leading organization in facilitation (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Slotterback, C. S., & Lauria, M. (2019). Building a foundation for public engagement in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(3), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1616985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smutny, D. M. (2021). Thrive: The facilitator’s guide to radically inclusive meetings (2nd ed.). Emerald Lake Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, R., Dannenberg, R., Kellington, W., & Sherman, P. (2020). Using drones in planning practice. Planning Advisory Service Report 597. American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, L., & Ozawa, C. (1984). Mediated negotiation in the public sector: The planner as mediator. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 4(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X8400400103
   Google Scholar
• Tooze, A. (2021). Shutdown: How Covid shook the world’s economy. Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Uenuma, F. (2020). Video chat is helping us stay connected in lockdown. But the tech was once a “spectacular flop.” Time. https://time.com/5834516/video-chat-zoom-history/
   Google Scholar
• Umemoto, K. (2001). Walking in another’s shoes: Epistemological challenges in participatory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0102100102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A. (2009). Participants’ roles in the context of a video club. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 100–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802581668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, W., & Parolin, B. (2012). Review of web-based communications for town planning in local government. Journal of Urban Technology, 19(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2012.626702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, W., & Parolin, B. (2013). Web 2.0 and social media growth in planning practice: A longitudinal study. Planning Practice and Research, 28(5), 544–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2013.840996
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2020). Let’s draw and talk about urban change: Deploying digital technology to encourage citizen participation in urban planning. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(9), 1588–1604. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319831290
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2021). Digital participatory planning: Citizen engagement, democracy, and design (1st ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2022). COVID-19 and the rise of digital planning: Fast and slow adoption of a digital planning system. Town Planning Review, 93(5), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2022.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Comber, R. (2019). Urban planning, public participation and digital technology: App development as a method of generating citizen involvement in local planning processes. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(2), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317712515
   Google Scholar
• Woolston, C. (2020). Learning to love virtual conferences in the coronavirus era. Nature, 582(7810), 135–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01489-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar