647
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Evaluating Collaborative Public–Private Partnerships

The Case of Toronto’s Smart City

References

  • Alizadeh, T. (2017). An investigation of IBM’s Smarter Cities Challenge: What do participating cities want? Cities, 63, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.009
  • Alizadeh, T., Grubesic, T. H., & Helderop, E. (2017). Urban governance and big corporations in the digital economy: An investigation of socio-spatial implications of Google Fiber in Kansas City. Telematics and Informatics, 24, 973–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.007
  • Alizadeh, T., & Sadowski, J. (2020). Smart urbanism: Processes, practices, and parameters. Telematics and Informatics, 55, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101493
  • Angelidou, M. (2017). Smart city planning and development shortcomings. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 10(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/4032
  • Blakely, E., & Snyder, M. G. (1997). Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Brookings Institution.
  • Block Sidewalk. (2019a, February 25). Block Sidewalk press release: Concerned Torontonians launch #BlockSidewalk campaign. https://www.blocksidewalk.ca/media
  • Block Sidewalk. (2019b). Block Sidewalk supporters. https://www.blocksidewalk.ca/supporters
  • Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447
  • Boyer, E. J. (2016). Identifying a knowledge management approach for public-private partnerships. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(1), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1204928
  • Boyer, E. J., Van Slyke, D. M., & Rogers, J. D. (2015). An empirical examination of public involvement in public-private partnerships: Qualifying the benefits of public involvement in PPPs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26, 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv008
  • Brail, S., & Vinodrai, T. (2020). The elusive, inclusive city: Toronto at a crossroads. In S. Bunce, S. Moore, & A. Walks (Eds.), Critical dialogues of urban governance, development and activism: London & Toronto (pp. 38–53). UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787356795
  • Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing” Neoliberalism. Antipode, 34(3), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00246
  • Brown, T. L., Potoski, M., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2009). Contracting for complex products. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 20, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055563616631563
  • Bunce, S. (2007). Gentrifying sustainability: Policy, planning, and the development of sustainability on Toronto’s central waterfront [Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation]. Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University.
  • Buttar, S., & Kalia, A. (2017, October 4). LinkNYC improves privacy policy, yet problems remain. Electronic Frontier Foundation. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/09/linknyc-improves-privacy-policy-yet-problems-remain
  • Cardoso, T., & O’Kane, J. (2019, October 30). Sidewalk Labs document reveals company’s early vision for data collection, tax powers, criminal justice. Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-sidewalk-labs-document-reveals-companys-early-plans-for-data/
  • Carr, C., & Hesse, M. (2020). When Alphabet Inc. plans Toronto’s waterfront: New post-political modes of urban governance. Urban Planning, 5(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2519
  • Chen, C., Hubbard, M., & Liao, C. (2013). When public-private partnerships fail: Analyzing citizen engagement in public-private partnerships—cases from Taiwan and China. Public Management Review, 15(6), 839–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.698856
  • Cheshire, P. (1999). Cities in competition: Articulating the gains from integration. Urban Studies, 36(5–6), 843–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993240
  • Clark, J. (2020). Uneven innovation: The work of smart cities. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/clar18496
  • Coghill, K., & Woodward, D. (2005). Political issues of public-private partnerships. In G. Hodge & C. Greve (Eds.), The challenge of public-private partnerships. (pp. 81–94). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845428082
  • Cowley, R., & Capriotti, F. (2019). Smart city as anti-planning in the UK. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 37(3), 428–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818787506
  • Cruz, O. V., & Sarmento, M. J. (2017). Reforming traditional PPP models to cope with the challenges of smart cities. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 18(1–2), 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1783591717734794
  • Deakin, M. (2013). Smart cities: Governing, modelling and analysing the transition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203076224
  • Deakin, N., & Edwards, J. (1993). The enterprise culture and the inner city. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203991435
  • Demirag, I., Khadaroo, I., Stapleton, P., & Stevenson, C. (2012). The diffusion of risks in public private partnership contracts. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(8), 1317–1339. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571211275498
  • Doctoroff, D. (2018, January 16). Dan Doctoroff on how we’ll realize the promise of urban innovation. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/dan-doctoroff-on-how-well-realize-the-promise-of-urban-innovation
  • Doctoroff, D. (2020, May 7). Why we’re no longer pursuing the Quayside project—and what’s next for Sidewalk Labs. Sidewalk Talk. https://medium.com/sidewalk-talk/why-were-no-longer-pursuing-the-quayside-project-and-what-s-next-for-sidewalk-labs-9a61de3fee3a
  • Dowling, R., McGuirk, P., & Maalsen, S. (2018). Realising smart cities: Partnerships and economic development in the emergence and practices of smart in Newcastle, Australia. In A. Karvonen, F. Cugurullo, & F. Caprotti (Eds.), Inside smart cities: Place, politics and urban innovation (pp. 15–29). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351166201
  • Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2009). Project versus process management in public–private partnership: Relation between management style and outcomes. International Public Management Journal, 12, 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490903094350
  • Fainstein, N., & Fainstein, S. (1985). Economic restructuring and the rise of urban social movements. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 21(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208168502100204
  • Ferreri, M., & Sanyal, R. (2018). Platform economies and urban planning: Airbnb and regulated deregulation in London. Urban Studies, 55(15), 3353–3358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017751982
  • Flynn, A., & Valverde, M. (2019). Planning on the waterfront: Setting the agenda for Toronto’s “smart city” project. Planning. Theory & Practice, 20(5), 769–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1676566
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings of case study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
  • Forrer, J., Kee, J. E., & Boyer, E. (2014). Governing cross-sector collaboration. Jossey-Bass.
  • Galati, S. (2017). Funding a smart city: From concept to actuality. In Smart cities (pp. 17–39). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59381-4_2
  • Ghose, R., & Johnson, P. A. (2020). Introduction to the special section: Smart citizens creating smart cities: Locating citizen participation in the smart city. Canadian Geographer, 64(3), 340–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12644
  • Goldstein, B., & Mele, C. (2016). Governance within public–private partnerships and the politics of urban development. Space and Polity, 20(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2016.1157968
  • Goodman, E., & Powles, J. (2019). Urbanism under Google: Lessons from Sidewalk Toronto. Fordham Law Review, 88(2), 457–498. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3390610
  • Hall, T., & Hubbard, P. (1996). The entrepreneurial city: New urban politics, new urban geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 20(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259602000201
  • Harris, M. (2016, June 27). Secretive Alphabet division funded by Google aims to fix public transit in US. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jun/27/google-flow-sidewalk-labs-columbus-ohio-parking-transit
  • Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geograpfiska Annale, 71, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
  • Heaphy, L., & Wiig, A. (2020). The 21st century corporate town: The politics of planning innovation districts. Telematics and Informatics, 55, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101459
  • Hodge, G. A., & Coghill, K. (2007). Accountability in the privatized state. Governance—an International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 20(4), 675–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00377.x
  • Hodge, G. A., & Greve, G. (2005). The challenge of public-private partnerships: Learning from international experience. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845428082
  • Hollands, R. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126
  • Hollands, R. (2015). Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011
  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
  • Iossa, E., & Martimort, D. (2015). The simple microeconomics of public‐private partnerships. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 17(1), 4–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12114
  • Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city: Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
  • Kitchin, R. (2015). Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu027
  • Klijn, E. H., & Teisman, G. R. (2005). Public-private partnerships as the management of co-production: Strategic & institutional obstacles in a difficult marriage. In G. Hodge & C. Greve (Eds.), The challenge of public-private partnerships: Learning from international experience (pp. 95–116). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845428082
  • Laidley, J. (2011). Creating an environment for change: The “ecosystem approach” and the Olympics on Toronto’s Waterfront. In G. Desfor & J. Laidley (Eds.), Reshaping Toronto’s waterfront (pp. 203–223). University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442661912-012
  • Larner, W. (2002). Globalization, governmentality and expertise: Creating a call centre labour force. Review of International Political Economy, 9(4), 650–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969229022000021844
  • Leichenko, R., & Solecki, W. (2005). The globalization of suburban consumption landscapes. Regional Studies, 39, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/003434005200060080
  • Luque-Ayala, A., McFarlane, C., & Marvin, S. (2014). Smart urbanism: Cities, grids, and alternatives. In M. Hodson & S. Marvin (Eds.), After sustainable cities? (pp. 74–90). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203074602
  • McCann, E. (2001). Collaborative visioning or urban planning as therapy? The politics of public-private policy making. Professional Geographer, 53(2), 217–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00280
  • Meijer, A. J., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Rodriguez Bolivar, M. P. (2015). Smart city research: Contextual conditions, governance models, and public value assessment. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315618890
  • Morgan, K., & Webb, B. (2020). Googling the city: In search of the public interest on Toronto’s “smart” waterfront. Urban Planning, 5(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2520
  • Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G., & Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylized facts. Cities, 38, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.010
  • Office of the Auditor General of Ontario. (2018). Annual report 2018. Queen’s Printer for Ontario. https://www.auditor.on.ca/en/content/annualreports/arbyyear/ar2018.html
  • Oved, M. C. (2019, February 15). Google’s Sidewalk Labs plans massive expansion to waterfront vision. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2019/02/14/googles-sidewalk-labs-plans-massive-expansion-to-waterfront-vision.html
  • Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61, 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00045
  • Provan, K. G., & Sebastian, J. G. (1998). Network within networks: Service link overlap, organizational cliques, and network effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 453–463. https://doi.org/10.5465/257084
  • Province of Ontario. (2016). BPS primer on innovation procurement. https://www.doingbusiness.mgs.gov.on.ca/mbs/psb/psb.nsf/0/df7388300f40aec68525814d004a00bf/$FILE/BPS_Primer_on_Innovation_Procurement_Interim.pdf
  • Rebentisch, H., Thompson, C., Côté-Roy, L., & Moser, S. (2020). Unicorn planning: Lessons from the rise and fall of an American “smart” mega development. Cities, 101, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102686
  • Roberts, D., & Siemiatycki, M. (2015). Fostering meaningful partnerships in public-private partnerships: Innovations in partnership design and process management to create value. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 780–793. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12250
  • Robinson, P., & Coutts, S. (2019). The case of Quayside, Toronto, Canada. In L. Anthopoulos (Ed.), Smart city emergence (pp. 333–350). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816169-2.00016-X
  • Sadowski, J., & BenDor, R. (2019). Selling smartness: Corporate narratives and the smart city as a sociotechnical imaginary. Science. Technology, & Human Values, 44(3), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918806061
  • Sadowski, J., & Maalsen, S. (2020). Modes of making smart cities: Or, practices of variegated smart urbanism. Telematics and Informatics, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101449
  • Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243
  • Selim, A. M., Yousef, P. H. A., & Hagag, M. R. (2018). Smart infrastructure by PPPs within the concept of smart cities to achieve sustainable development. Critical Infrastructures, 14(2), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2018.091943
  • Shatkin, G. (2008). The city and the bottom line: Urban megaprojects and the privatization of planning in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning A, 40, 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38439
  • Shatkin, G. (2011). Planning privatopolis: Representation and contestation in the development of urban integrated mega-projects. In A. Roy and A. Ong (Eds.), Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global (pp. 77–97). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01216_2.x
  • Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, A. (2015). The “actually existing smart city.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu026
  • Sidewalk Labs. (2019). Master innovation and development plan. https://www.sidewalktoronto.ca/midp/
  • Siemiatycki, M. (2007). What’s the secret? Confidentiality in planning infrastructure using public/private partnerships. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(4), 388–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360708978520
  • Siemiatycki, M. (2015). Public-private partnerships in Canada: Reflections on twenty years of practice. Canadian Public Administration, 58(3), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12119
  • Siemiatycki, M., & Farooqi, N. (2012). Value for money and risk in public–private partnerships. Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(3), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2012.715525
  • Söderström, O., Paasche, T., & Klauser, F. (2014). Smart cities as corporate storytelling. City, 18(3), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2014.906716
  • Valverde, M., & Flynn, A. (2018). More buzzwords than answers to Sidewalk Labs in Toronto. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 6(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.15302/j-laf-20180212
  • Vanolo, A. (2014). Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies, 51, 883–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494427
  • Velotti, L., Botti, A., & Vesci, M. (2012). Public-private partnerships and network governance. Public Performance & Management Review, 36, 340–365. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360209
  • Waterfront Toronto. (2013, December 18). Waterfront Toronto strategic business plan 2014–2023. Waterfront Toronto.
  • Waterfront Toronto. (2015, December 15). 2015/16 Waterfront Toronto corporate plan. Waterfront Toronto.
  • Waterfront Toronto. (2017a, December 7). 2018/19 Waterfront Toronto corporate plan. Waterfront Toronto.
  • Waterfront Toronto. (2017b, April 20). Board meeting book. Waterfront Toronto.
  • Waterfront Toronto. (2017c, October 16). Framework agreement between Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs. Waterfront Toronto.
  • Waterfront Toronto. (2017d, October 11). Government relations update presentation. Waterfront Toronto.
  • Waterfront Toronto. (2017e, March 17). Requests for proposals, innovation and funding partner for the Quayside development opportunity. Waterfront Toronto.
  • Waterfront Toronto. (2018, June 7). Digital strategy advisory panel meeting minutes. Waterfront Toronto.
  • Waterfront Toronto. (2019a, July 31). Plan development agreement. Waterfront Toronto.
  • Waterfront Toronto. (2019b, July 15). Public meeting on Sidewalk Labs’ proposal for Quayside. Waterfront Toronto.
  • Xiong, X., Chen, B., Wang, H., & Zhu, D. (2018). Governing public-private partnerships: A systematic review of case study literature. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 78(12), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12343
  • Yarow, J. (2013, May 16). Google CEO Larry Page wants a totally separate world where tech companies can conduct experiments on people. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/google-ceo-larry-page-wants-a-place-for-experiments-2013-5
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Hachette Book Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2019.1639068
  • Zukin, S. (2020). The innovation complex: Cities, tech, and the new economy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13018

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.