182
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric

References

  • Aguinaldo, E. R., & Peissig, J. J. (2021). Who’s behind the makeup? The effects of varying levels of cosmetics application on perceptions of facial attractiveness, competence, and sociosexuality. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 661006. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661006
  • Bar-Tal, D., & Saxe, L. (1976). Physical attractiveness and its relationship to sex-role stereotyping. Sex Roles, 2(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287245
  • Biernat, M., Manis, M., & Nelson, T. E. (1991). Stereotypes and standards of judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.485
  • Bittmann, F. (2020). The relationship between height and leadership: Evidence from across Europe. Economics and Human Biology, 36, 100829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2019.100829
  • Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Rusconi, P., & Goodwin, G. (2021). The primacy of morality in impression development: Theory, research, and future directions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 64, 187–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.03.001
  • Cash, T. F., Gillen, B., & Burns, D. S. (1977). Sexism and beautyism in personnel consultant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(3), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.3.301
  • Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025004002
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O'Brien, L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359
  • Cuadrado, I., López-Rodríguez, L., Brambilla, M., & Ordóñez-Carrasco, J. L. (2023). Active and passive facilitation tendencies at work towards sexy and professional women: The role of stereotypes and emotions. Psychological Reports, 126(2), 812–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211058149
  • Cuadrado, I., López-Rodríguez, L., & Navas, M. (2016). La perspectiva de la minoría: Estereotipos y emociones entre grupos inmigrantes [The minority’s perspective: Stereotypes and emotions between immigrant groups]. Anales de Psicología, 32(2), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.2.205341
  • Curran, P. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015914
  • Chen, X., Trafimow, D., Wang, T., Tong, T., & Wang, C. (2021). The APP procedure for estimating the Cohen’s effect size. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 5(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-08-2021-0095
  • Dellinger, K., & Williams, C. L. (1997). Makeup at work: Negotiating appearance rules in the workplace. Gender & Society, 11(2), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124397011002002
  • Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573
  • Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1991). Are women evaluated more favorably than men?: An analysis of attitudes, beliefs, and emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00792.x
  • Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779543000002
  • Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. The American Psychologist, 75(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494
  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T., Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 458–476). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49
  • Etcoff, N. L., Stock, S., Haley, L. E., Vickery, S. A., & House, D. M. (2011). Cosmetics as a feature of the extended human phenotype: modulation of the perception of biologically important facial signals. PLoS One, 6(10), e25656. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025656
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878
  • Garcia-Retamero, R., & López-Zafra, E. (2006). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles, 55(1–2), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9068-1
  • Glick, P., Wilk, K., & Perreault, M. (1995). Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 32(9–10), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544212
  • Hamermesh, D. S. (2011). Beauty pays: Why attractive people are more successful. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7sjgz
  • Heilman, M. E., & Stopeck, M. H. (1985). Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job type. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(2), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90035-4
  • Heilman, M., & Wallen, A. S. (2010). Wimpy and undeserving of respect: Penalties for men’s gender-inconsistent success. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 664–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.01.008
  • Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416
  • Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E. F., & Coats, G. (2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00157.x
  • International Labour Organization. (2020). These occupations are dominated by women. https://ilostat.ilo.org/these-occupations-are-dominated-by-women/
  • International Labour Organization. (2021). How women are being left behind in the quest for decent work for all. https://ilostat.ilo.org/how-women-are-being-left-behind-in-the-quest-for-decent-work-for-all/
  • Johnson, S. K., Podratz, K. E., Dipboye, R. L., & Gibbons, E. (2010). Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: Tracking down the "beauty is beastly" effect. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365414
  • Klebl, C., Rhee, J. J., Greenaway, K. H., Luo, Y., & Bastian, B. (2022). Beauty goes down to the core: Attractiveness biases moral character attributions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 46(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-021-00388-w
  • Krys, K., Capaldi, C. A., van Tilburg, W., Lipp, O. V., Bond, M. H., Vauclair, C.-M., Manickam, L. S. S., Domínguez-Espinosa, A., Torres, C., Lun, V. M.-C., Teyssier, J., Miles, L. K., Hansen, K., Park, J., Wagner, W., Yu, A. A., Xing, C., Wise, R., Sun, C.-R., … Ahmed, R. A. (2018). Catching up with wonderful women: The women-are-wonderful effect is smaller in more gender egalitarian societies. International Journal of Psychology: Journal International de Psychologie, 53(S1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12420
  • Lan, M., Peng, M., Zhao, X., Chen, H., Liu, Y., & Yang, J. (2022). Facial attractiveness is more associated with individual warmth than with competence: Behavioral and neural evidence. Social Neuroscience, 17(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2022.2069152
  • Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
  • Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
  • Levin, I., Rouwenhorst, R., & Trisko, H. (2005). Separating gender biases in screening and selecting candidates for hiring and firing. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 33(8), 793–804. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2005.33.8.793
  • López-Rodríguez, L., Cuadrado, I., & Navas, M. (2013). Aplicación extendida del modelo del contenido de los estereotipos (MCE) hacia tres grupos de inmigrantes en España [Extended application of the Stereotype Content Model (SCM) towards three immigrant groups in Spain. Estudios de Psicología, 34(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093913806751375
  • Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5
  • Ma, D. S., Kantner, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2021). Chicago face database: Multiracial expansion. Behavior Research Methods, 53(3), 1289–1300. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01482-5
  • Morgenroth, T., & Ryan, M. K. (2018). Addressing gender inequality: Stumbling blocks and roads ahead. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 671–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218786079
  • Moscatelli, S., Menegatti, M., Ellemers, N., Mariani, M. G., & Rubini, M. (2020). Men should be competent, women should have it all: Multiple criteria in the evaluation of female job candidates. Sex Roles, 83(5-6), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01111-2
  • Neuberg, S. L., Williams, K. E., Sng, O., Pick, C. M., Neel, R., Krems, J. A., & Pirlott, A. G. (2020). Toward capturing the functional and nuanced nature of social stereotypes: An affordance management approach. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 62, pp. 245–304). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.04.004
  • Pireddu, S., Bongiorno, R., Ryan, M. K., Rubini, M., & Menegatti, M. (2022). The deficit bias: Candidate gender differences in the relative importance of facial stereotypic qualities to leadership hiring. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(2), 644–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12501
  • Ruffle, B. J., & Shtudiner, Z. (2015). Are good-looking people more employable? Management Science, 61(8), 1760–1776. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24551505 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1927
  • Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S., Brambilla, M., Capellini, R., & Cherubini, P. (2020). Being honest and acting consistently: Boundary conditions of the negativity effect in the attribution of morality. Social Cognition, 38(2), 146–178. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2020.38.2.146
  • Sayans-Jiménez, P., Rojas, A., & Cuadrado, I. (2017). Is it advisable to include negative attributes to assess the stereotype content? Yes, but only in the morality dimension. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12346
  • Sheppard, L. D., & Johnson, S. K. (2019). The femme fatale effect: Attractiveness is a liability for businesswomen’s perceived truthfulness, trust, and deservingness of termination. Sex Roles, 81(11–12), 779–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01031-1
  • Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071663
  • Trafimow, D. (2019). A frequentist alternative to significance testing, p-values, and confidence intervals. Econometrics, 7(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics7020026
  • Trafimow, D., Roth, N., Xu, L., Toomasian, D., Perrello, A., Tong, T., Wang, T., Choy, S. T. B., Chen, X., Wang, C., & Hu, L. (2023). Surprising implications of differences in locations versus differences in means. Methodology, 19(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.10969
  • Trafimow, D., Wang, T., & Wang, C. (2019). From a sampling precision perspective, skewness is a friend and not an enemy! Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164418764801
  • Turkmenoglu, M. A. (2020). Exploring appearance-based discrimination in the workplace. In M. A. Turkmenoglu & B. Cicek (Eds.), Contemporary global issues in human resource management (pp. 23–35). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-392-220201004
  • Warhurst, C., van den Broek, D., Hall, R., & Nickson, D. (2009). Lookism: The new frontier of employment discrimination? Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185608096808

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.