Why it is rational to expect the horrible – The future of humanity and climate change

References

• Asafu-Adjaye, J., L. Blomqvist, S. Brand, B. Brook, R. de Fries, E. Ellis, C. Foreman, D. Keith, M. Lewis, M. Lynas, T. Nordhaus, R. Pielke Jr., R. Pritzker, J. Roy, M. Sagoff, M. Shellenberger, R. Stone, and P. Teague. 2015. An Ecomodernist Manifesto. www.ecomodernism.org/manifesto
   Google Scholar
• Bendell, J., and R. Read. 2021. “What climate science can and cannot tell us about our predicament.” In: Deep adaptation: navigating the realities of climate chaos, edited by J. Bendell and R. Read, 15–41. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs R. A. 2019. “Normative theories of rational choice: Expected utility.” In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/rationality-normative-utility/
   Google Scholar
• Butler, S. 2019. “The impact of advanced capitalism on well-being: An evidence-informed model.” Hu Arenas 2(2): 200–227. doi:10.1007/s42087-018-0034-6
   Google Scholar
• Climate Change. 2022a. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Working Group II contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
   Google Scholar
• Climate Change. 2022b. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-3/
   Google Scholar
• Desrochers P. and C. Hoffbauer. 2009. “The post war intellectual roots of the Population Bomb: Fairfield Osborn’s ‘Our Plundered Planet’ and William Vogt’s ‘Road to Survival’ in retrospect.” The Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development 1(1).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. n.d. “Do no significant harm.” https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/2021_02_18_epc_do_not_significant_harm_-technical_guidance_by_the_commission.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Felli, R. 2021. The great adaptation: climate, capitalism and catastrophe, Trans. David Broder. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, K. R., P. Vecchia, and M. H. Repacholi. 2000. “Science and the precautionary principle.” Science 288(5468): 979–981. doi:10.1126/science.288.5468.979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, B. 2021. How to avoid a climate disaster: the solutions we have and the breakthroughs we need. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A. 2021. The nutmeg’s curse: parables for a planet in crisis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226815466.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Gowdy, J. 2020. “Our hunter-gatherer future: Climate change, agriculture and uncivilization.” Futures 115, 102488. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2019.102488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greaves, H. 2019. “Climate change and optimum population.” Monist 102(1): 42–65. doi:10.1093/monist/ony021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, M. 2018. Conditional optimism: Economic perspectives on deep carbonization. New York: Institute for New Economic Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Hahnel, R., and E. O. Wright. 2016. Alternatives to capitalism: proposals for a democratic economy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A., L. Bi, A. Saniotis, and M. Nitschke. 2013. “Vulnerability to extreme heat and climate change: Is ethnicity a factor?” Global Health Action 6(1): 21364. doi:10.3402/gha.v6i0.21364
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanson J. 2018. “Precautionary principle: Current understandings in law and society.” In: Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene, edited by D. A. Dellasala, and M. I. Goldstein, 361–366. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., and S. Holm. 2002. “Extending human lifespan and the precautionary paradox.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (3): 355–368. doi:10.1076/jmep.27.3.355.2983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. 2010. Rationality and the genetic challenge: making people better? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139194679
   Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. 2022. Roles of justice in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009104364
   Google Scholar
• Holm, S., and J. Harris, J. 1999. “Precautionary principle stifles discovery.” Nature 400(6743): 398. doi:10.1038/22626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S., and T. Takala. 2007. “High hopes and automatic escalators: A critique of some new arguments in bioethics.” Journal of Medical Ethics 33(1): 1–4. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.016477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. 2006. “How not to criticize the precautionary principle.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31(5): 447–464. doi:10.1080/03605310600912642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, N. 2007. The shock doctrine: the rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Lincke, D., and J. Hinkel. 2021. “Coastal migration due to 21st century sea-level rise.” Earth’s Future 9(5): e2020EF001965. doi:10.1029/2020EF001965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, C., W. Rogers, and S. Dodds, eds. 2013. Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy, New York, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. 2006. “Global risk from extreme geophysical events: threat identification and assessment.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 364(1845): 1889–1909. doi:10.1098/rsta.2006.1804
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, A. J., and E. Lindgren. 2011. “Climate change: Present and future risks to health, and necessary responses.” Journal of Internal Medicine 270(5): 401–413. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02415.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H., D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. Behrens, III. 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, M. A. 2019. Women’s Activism, Feminism, and Social Justice. Studies In Feminist Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parr A. 2021. “The gender-climate-injustice nexus.” In: The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Philosophy, edited by K. Q. Hall and Ásta, 474–483. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, I., and J. Savulescu. 2012. Unfit for the future? The need for moral enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199653645.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. 2018. Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism and Progress. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.4159/9780674042605
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, S., and V. Soromenho-Marques. 2022. “The techno-optimists of climate change: Science communication or technowashing?” Societies 12(2): 64. doi:10.3390/soc12020064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symons, J. 2019. Ecomodernism: Technology, politics and the climate crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szocik, K. 2022. “Evolutionary biology as a source of reliable knowledge about extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI): Why we should reject militarism in our thinking about ETI.” In: Extraterrestrial Intelligence: Academic and Societal Implications, edited by J. Andresen and O. A. Chon-Torres, 173–186. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Szocik, K. 2023. Bioethics of space exploration. Human enhancement and gene editing in future space missions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2022. World Population Prospects 2022. Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Population Division. https://population.un.org/wpp/
   Google Scholar
• Zubrin, R. 2019. “Why we Earthlings should colonize Mars!” Theology and Science 17(3): 305–316. doi:10.1080/14746700.2019.1632519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar