Climate change and anti-natalism: Between the horrible and the unthinkable

References

• Anscombe, G. E. M. 1989. “Why have children?” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 63: 48–53. doi:10.5840/acpaproc1989634
   Google Scholar
• Ashcroft, R. 2009. “Is it irrational to have children?” In: Cutting Through the Surface: Philosophical Approaches to Bioethics, edited by T. Takala, P. Herissone-Kelly, and S Holm, 183–195. Amsterdam: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789042027404_020
   Google Scholar
• Baca Zinn, M., P. Hondagneu-Sotelo, and M. A. Messner. 2005. Gender Through the Prism of Difference. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benatar, D. 1997. “Why it is better never to come into existence.” American Philosophical Quarterly 34: 345–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benatar, D. 2006. Better Never to Have Been. Oxford: Clarendon. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296422.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Benatar, D. 2012. “Every conceivable harm: A further defence of anti-natalism.” South African Journal of Philosophy 31(1): 128–164. doi:10.1080/02580136.2012.10751773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benatar, D. 2015. “The misanthropic argument for anti-natalism.” In: Permissible Progeny, edited by S. Hannan, S. Brennan, and R. Vernon, 34–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199378111.003.0002
   Google Scholar
• Benedict XVI. 2013. “Address to participants at the General Assembly of the Pontifical Academy for Life.” International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 123: S2–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. 2004. “Human reproduction: Irrational but in most cases morally defensible.” Journal of Medical Ethics 30(4): 379–380. doi:10.1136/jme.2003.004747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. 2009. “Human reproduction: Selfish and irrational but not immoral.” In: Cutting Through the Surface: Philosophical Approaches to Bioethics, edited by T. Takala, P. Herissone-Kelly, and S. Holm, 197–209. Amsterdam: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Berkeley, G. 1712. Passive Obedience. London: H. Clements.
   Google Scholar
• Boonin, D. 2012. “Better to be.” South African Journal of Philosophy 31(1): 10–25. doi:10.1080/02580136.2012.10751764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, J. 2022. “Climate change and population ethics.” In: The Oxford handbook of population ethics, edited by G. Arrhenius, K. Bykvist, T. Campbell, and E. Finneron-Burns, 393–406. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190907686.013.26
   Google Scholar
• Brundtland, G. H. 1993. “Gro Harlem Brundtland on population, environment, and development.” Population and Development Review 19(4): 893–899. doi:10.2307/2938431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., D. W. Brock, N. Daniels, and D. Wikler. 2000. From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511806940
   Google Scholar
• Buller, T. 2009. “Gambling, risks, and reproduction: A reply to Matti Häyry.” In: Cutting Through the Surface: Philosophical Approaches to Bioethics, edited by T. Takala, P. Herissone-Kelly, and S. Holm, 211–217. Amsterdam: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789042027404_022
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 2019. On Intersectionality: Essential Writings. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Beauvoir, S. 1949. Le Deuxième Sexe. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, S. 1970. The dialectic of sex: the case for feminist revolution. New York: William Morrow and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. 1974. The Ethics of Genetic Control: Ending Reproductive Roulette. Garden City: Anchor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, J. 2006. Choosing Children: Genes, Disability and Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290925.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Green, R. 2007. Babies by Design: The Ethics of Genetic Choice. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2003. The Future of Human Nature, Trans. W. Rehg, M. Pensky, and H. Beister. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, E., and S. Haslanger. 2006. Theorizing Feminisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K. Q. and Ásta, eds. 2021. The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. 1985. The Value of Life: An Introduction to Medical Ethics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. 1994. Liberal Utilitarianism and Applied Ethics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. 1996. “How to make sense of one’s impending illness and death?” In: Philosophy and AIDS, edited by C. A. Erin, 38–42. Manchester: Reports from the Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. 2001. “È indesirabile che I bambini nascano infettati dall’HIV?” [Is it undesirable that children are born with HIV?] Bioetica – Rivista interdisciplinare 9: 627–635.
   Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. 2004a. “A rational cure for prereproductive stress syndrome.” Journal of Medical Ethics 30(4): 377–378. doi:10.1136/jme.2003.004424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. 2004b. “If you must make babies, then at least make the best babies you can?” Human Fertility 7(2): 105–112. doi:10.1080/14647270410001699063
   Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. 2010. Rationality and the genetic challenge: making people better? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139194679
   Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. 2012. “Passive obedience and Berkeley’s moral philosophy.” Berkeley Studies 23: 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. 2018. “Ethics and cloning.” British Medical Bulletin 128(1): 15–21. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldy031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. 2022. Roles of justice in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009104364
   Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. 2023a. “Exit duty generator.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. Published online 17 February: 1–15. doi:10.1017/S096318012300004X
   Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. 2023b. Roe v. “Wade and the predatory state interest in protecting future cannon fodder.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32: 434–442. doi:10.1017/S0963180122000342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. 2024. “Confessions of an antinatalist philosopher.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. Published online 2 January: 1–19. doi:10.1017/S0963180123000634
   Google Scholar
• Häyry, M. and A. Sukenick. 2024. Antinatalism, Extinction, and the End of Procreative Self-Corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/antinatalism-extinction-and-the-end-of-procreative-selfcorruption/A88E18CA50EF6D919CE459C007447DB4#element
   Google Scholar
• Holm, S. 2004. “Why it is not strongly irrational to have children.” Journal of Medical Ethics 30(4): 381. doi:10.1136/jme.2003.004762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John Paul II. 1995. Evangelium Vitae. https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031995_evangelium-vitae.html
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., and R. L. Zacharias. 2017. “The future of reproductive autonomy. Just reproduction: Reimagining autonomy in reproductive medicine.” Hastings Center Report 47(6): S6–11. doi: 10.1002/hast.773
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kass, L. R. 2002. Life, liberty, and the defense of dignity: the challenge for bioethics. San Francisco: Encounter Books.
   Google Scholar
• Klausen, S., and A. Bashford. 2010. “Fertility control: Eugenics, neo-Malthusianism, and feminism.” In: The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics, edited by A. Bashford, and P. Levine, 98–115. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leavitt, F. 2009. “The meaning of suffering: A critique of the Häyry syndrome.” In: Cutting Through the Surface: Philosophical Approaches to Bioethics, edited by T. Takala, P. Herissone-Kelly, and S. Holm, 173–182. Amsterdam: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789042027404_019
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, A. 1993. The Elimination of Morality: Reflections on Utilitarianism and Bioethics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matikainen, O. A. 2019. Sustaining the one-dimensional: an ideology critique of Agenda 2030 and the SDGs. Master’s thesis, Uppsala University Department of Earth Sciences, Sweden. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1326645/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, C. 2022. “The right to reproduce.” In: Routledge Handbook of Feminist Bioethics, edited by W. A. Rogers, J. L. Scully, S. M. Carter, V. A. Entwhistle, and C. Mills, 451–462. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, D. T. 2002. Gender in the Mirror: Cultural Imagery and Women’s Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0195140419.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, J. C. 1978. Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy, 1800-1900. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 2011. Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (Original work published 1945) 1966. The Spell of Plato. 5th edn, vol. 1., 284–285. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Quinton, A. (Original work published 1973) 1989. Utilitarian Ethics. 2nd edn. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe Richards, J. 1980. The Sceptical Feminist. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, P. 1970. Fabricated Man: The Ethics of Genetic Control. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. 2007. The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/9780674043060
   Google Scholar
• Savulescu, J. 2001. “Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children.” Bioethics 15(5–6): 413–426. doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider-Mayerson, M., and K. L. Leong. 2020. “Eco-reproductive concerns in the age of climate change.” Climatic Change 163(2): 1007–1023. doi:10.1007/s10584-020-02923-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, S. V. 1999. “Wrongful life, procreative responsibility, and the significance of harm.” Legal Theory 5(2): 117–48. doi:10.1017/S1352325299052015
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A. 2012. “Furthering the case for anti-natalism: Seana Shiffrin and the limits of permissible harm.” South African Journal of Philosophy 31(1): 104–116. doi:10.1080/02580136.2012.10751771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, R. N. 1958. “Negative utilitarianism.” Mind 67(268): 542–543. doi:10.1093/mind/LXVII.268.542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smilansky, S. 2012. “Life is good.” South African Journal of Philosophy 31(1): 69–78. doi:10.1080/02580136.2012.10751768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State of World Population Report. 2021. My Body Is My Own. Claiming the Right to Autonomy and Self-Determination. New York: UNFPA.
   Google Scholar
• Szocik, K., and M. Häyry. 2023. “Why is it rational to expect the horrible. The future of humanity and climate change.” South African Journal of Philosophy 43(1).
   Google Scholar
• Takala, T. 2009. “Human before sex? Ectogenesis as a way to equality.” In: Reprogen-Ethics and the Future of Gender, edited by F. Simonstein, 187–195. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2475-6_15
   Google Scholar
• Takala, T. and M. Häyry. 2023. Justainability. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. Published online 27 June: 1–11. doi:10.1017/S0963180123000361
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2015a. Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2015b. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, D. 2015. “Against anti-natalism.” In: Debating Procreation: Is It Wrong to Reproduce?, edited by D. Benatar, and D Wasserman, 148–181. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199333547.003.0008
   Google Scholar
• Weber, H. 2017. “Politics of ‘leaving no one behind’: Contesting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals Agenda.” Globalizations 14(3): 399–414. doi:10.1080/14747731.2016.1275404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, R. 2012. “Is having children always wrong?” South African Journal of Philosophy 31(1): 26–37. doi:10.1080/02580136.2012.10751765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicks, R. 2021. “Arthur Schopenhauer.” In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/schopenhauer
   Google Scholar
• Woolfe, S. 2020. “On antinatalism and depression.” Epoché 30, April. https://epochemagazine.org/30/on-antinatalism-and-depression/
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar