Accounting for an encounter involving a social worker and man with learning disabilities and crafting tools for ethical social work practice

References

• Adorno, T. (1951/2005). Minima Moralia: Reflections from damaged life. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. (2015). For ethnography. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, C. (2004). The Sage dictionary of cultural studies. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z., & May, T. (1990/2001). Thinking Sociologically. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, C. (2010). Assessment and intervention in social work: Preparing for practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Birdwhistell, R. (1952). An introduction to kinesics. University of Louisville Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Trans. Richard Nice. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowie, M. (1991). Lacan. Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Brechin, A. (1998). What makes for good care? In A. Brechin, J. Walmsley, J. Katz, & S. Peace (Eds.), Care matters: Concepts, practice and research in health and social care (pp. 170–187). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, E. S. (2007). The world at a glance. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cockain, A. (2018a). Walking small with ‘Paul‘, a man with ‘severe learning difficulties‘: On (not) passing in purportedly public places. Disability & Society, 33(5), 705–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockain, A. (2018b). Ethnography as Process and Product: Residential Neighborhoods and Reflexivity in Shanghai. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526440464
   Google Scholar
• Cockain, A. (2021). Disturbing geographies and in/stability in and around a supermarket with a middle-aged man with learning impairments. Cultural Geographies, 28(4), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02146-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockain, A. (2022). Making spaces in exclusionary places: The spatial tactics/stories of disabled people and their families in Hong Kong. Disability & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2061331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, A. (2011). Participant observation. In V. Jupp (Ed.), The Sage dictionary of social research methods (pp. 214–216). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dalrymple, J., & Burke, B. (2006). Anti-oppressive practice: Social care and the law (2nd ed.). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Harre, R. O. M. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, M. J. (2010). Feeling normal’ and ‘feeling disabled. In S. N. Barnett (Ed.), Disability as a fluid state<fronttag class=“backTag” contenteditable=“false”> source</fronttag> (pp. 25–48). Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2005). The Mental Capacity Act 2005. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/section/31
   Google Scholar
• Doody, O. (2018). Ethical challenges in intellectual disability research. Mathews Journal of Nursing and Care, 1(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, A. (1993). Letters from a war zone: Writings, 1976-1989. Lawrence Hill Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1(1), 49–98. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (2000). The civilising process. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, B. (2008). Poststructuralism. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 666–670). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Felski, R. (1999). The invention of everyday life. New Formations, 39, 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American sociological review, 48(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A. W. (1975). Sociology and the everyday life. In L. A. Coser (Ed.), The idea of social structure (pp. 417–432). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Guilfoyle, M. (2016). Subject positioning: Gaps and stability in the therapeutic encounter. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 29(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2015.1034815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension: Man’s use of space in public and private. Bodley Head.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1971). The sounds of silence. In J. Spradley & D. McCurdy (Eds.), Conformity and conflict: Readings in cultural anthropology (7th ed., pp. 65–76). HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, N., & Philo, C. (2007). The normality of doing things differently: Bodies, spaces and disability geography. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 98(4), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00417.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Highmore, B. (2002). Introduction: Questioning everyday life. In B. Highmore (Ed.), The everyday life reader (pp. 1–34). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, D. (2011). Ethnography. In V. Jupp (Ed.), The Sage dictionary of social research methods (pp. 101–103). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2017). Anthropology contra ethnography. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2018a). Anthropology: Why it matters. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2018b). Anthropology and/as education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, P., Quayle, E., Wilkinson, H., & MacMahon, K. (2021). Relationships matter! — Utilising ethics of care to understand transitions in the lives of adults with severe intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(3), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellett, M., & Nind, M. (2001). Ethics in quasi-experimental research on people with severe learning disabilities: Dilemmas and compromises. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(2), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3156.2001.00096.x
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (1998). “Out of place”, “Knowing one’s place”: Space, power and the exclusion of disabled people. Disability & Society, 13(3), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599826678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinman, A. (2010, July–August). On caregiving. Harvard Magazine, pp. 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kondrat, M. E. (2002). Actor-centered social work: Re-visioning “Person-in-environment” through a critical theory lens. Social Work, 47(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/47.4.435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koubel, G. (2013). The modernization of social work. In G. Koubel (Ed.), Social work with adults (pp. 26–40). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. (1981/1993). The seminar of Jacques Lacan (Book 3: The psychoses). Translated by Grigg Russell. W.W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mietola, R., Miettinen, S., & Vehmas, S. (2017). Voiceless subjects? Research ethics and persons with profound intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1287872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muncey, T. (2010). Creating autoethnographies. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nind, M. (2008). Conducting qualitative research with people with learning, communication and other disabilities: Methodological challenges. National Centre for Research Methods. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/491/.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, M. (1993). Social research and sociology. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (pp. 1–17). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, K. (2005). Ethnographic methods. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ottenheimer, H. J., & Pine, J. M. S. (2019). The anthropology of language: An introduction to linguistic anthropology. Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, K., & Hughes, B. (1999). Disability studies and phenomenology: The carnal politics of everyday life. Disability & Society, 14(5), 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599925966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, J., & Thomas, M. (2010). Dictionary of social work: The definitive a to Z of social work and social care. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, A., Coverdale, A., Croydon, A., Hall, E., Kaley, A., Macpherson, H., & Nind, M. (2022). Personalisation policy in the lives of people with learning disabilities: A call to focus on how people build their lives relationally. Critical Social Policy, 42(2), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183211004534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads, and intrusions. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M. (2013). What kinship is—and is not. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, A. (1970). On phenomenology and social relations. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. F. (2021). Social work and sociology/sociology and social work: Peering back and forth. Qualitative Social Work, 20(5), 1184–1203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325020973300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D., & Marvasti, A. (2008). Doing qualitative research: A comprehensive guide. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, J., French, S., & Cameron, C. (2003). Controversial issues in a disabling society. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. B. (1991). Introduction. In P. Bourdieu, Language and symbolic power, Eds. G. Raymond and M. Adamson (Eds.), (pp. 1–31). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Titchkosky, T. (2003). Disability, self and society. Toronto University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trager, G. L. (1958). Paralanguage: A first approximation. Studies in Linguistics, 13, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tuffrey-Wijne, I., Bernal, J., & Hollins, S. (2008). Doing research on people with learning disabilities, cancer and dying: Ethics, possibilities and pitfalls. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(3), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2008.00519.x
   Google Scholar
• Ward, N., Raphael, C., Clark, M., & Raphael, V. (2016). Involving people with profound and multiple learning disabilities in social work education: Building inclusive practice. Social Work Education, 35(8), 918–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2016.1239705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. (2004). Narrative practice and exotic lives: Resurrecting diversity in everyday life. Dulwich Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. (2006). How to read Lacan. Granta Books.
   Google Scholar