Exploring the materiality of science learning: analytical frameworks for examining interactions with material objects in science meaning-making

References

• Chin, Christine. 2006. “Classroom Interaction in Science: Teacher Questioning and Feedback to students’ Responses.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (11): 1315–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, Frederick. 1992. “Ethnographic Microanalysis of Interaction.” In The Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, edited by M. D. LeCompte, Wendy Millroy, and Judith Preissle, 201–225. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. 1965. “The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis.” Social Problems 12 (4): 436–445. https://doi.org/10.2307/798843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumperz, John Joseph. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge; England, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic : The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. London: E. Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, Lindsay, Mark Hardman, Jill Noakes, and Rupert Wegerif. 2018. “Making the Case for a Material-Dialogic Approach to Science Education.” Studies in Science Education 54 (2): 141–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1598036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, Bob, and R. Kress. Gunther. 1988. Social Semiotics. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, Carey. 2009. “Different Approaches to Multimodality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, edited by Carey Jewitt, 28–39. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Brigitte, and Austin Henderson. 1995. “Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 4 (1): 39–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane, Webb. 2008. “Modes of Objectification in Educational Experience.” Linguistics & Education 19 (3): 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.05.008.
   Google Scholar
• Knain, Erik, Tobias Fredlund, and Anniken Furberg. 2021. “Exploring Student Reasoning and Representation Construction in School Science Through the Lenses of Social Semiotics and Interaction Analysis.” Research in Science Education 51 (1): 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09975-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther, Carey Jewitt, Jon Ogborn, and Charalampos Tsatsarelis. 2014. Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. 2nd ed. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images : The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images : The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd edition ed. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social : An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, Jay L. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning and Values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Victor Fei. 2019. “Analysing the teachers’ Use of Gestures in the Classroom: A Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis Approach.” Social Semiotics 29 (1): 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1412168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Luciana, Moro, Eduardo F. Mortimer, and Andrée Tiberghien. 2020. “The Use of Social Semiotic Multimodality and Joint Action Theory to Describe Teaching Practices: Two Cases Studies with Experienced Teachers.” Classroom Discourse 11 (3): 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1570528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinec, R. 2000. “Types of Process in Action.” Semiotica 130 (3–4): 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2000.130.3-4.243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, Catherine, and Kathryn Scantlebury. 2019. “Material Practice and Materiality: Too Long Ignored in Science Education.” In Material Practice and Materiality: Too Long Ignored in Science Education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01974-7.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Wendy, and Jennifer Yeo. 2022. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Multimodal Meaning-Making in Science.” Research in Science Education 52 (3): 751–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10051-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S. 2004. Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, Kay L. 2006. Multimodal Discourse Analysis : Systemic-Functional Perspectives. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, Kay L. 2015. “The Language of Learning Mathematics: A Multimodal Perspective.” The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 40:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, Michael. 1994. The Language of Displayed Art. Vancouver, Canada: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzer-Ardenghi, L. 2009. “Research on Inscriptions: Visual Literacy, Authentic Science Practices, and Multimodality.” In The World of Science Education, edited by W.-M. Roth and K. Tobin, 307–324. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Rooy, Van, Wilhelmina Sabina, and Eveline Chan. 2017. “Multimodal Representations in Senior Biology Assessments: A Case Study of NSW Australia.” International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education 15 (7): 1237–1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9741-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollon, Ronald. 1998. Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction: A Study of News Discourse. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, K. S. 2016. “The Interplay of Representations and Patterns of Classroom Discourse in Science Teaching Sequences.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (13): 2069–2095. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1218568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, K. S. 2020. Discourse Strategies for Science Teaching and Learning: Research and Practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, K. S., Cesar Delgado, and E. B. Moje. 2014. “An Integrative Framework for the Analysis of Multiple and Multimodal Representations for Meaning-Making in Science Education.” Science Education 98 (2): 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, K. S., C. Ho, and G. B. S. Putra. 2016. “Developing multimodal communication competencies: A case of disciplinary literacy focus in Singapore.” In Using Multimodal Representations to Support Learning in the Science Classroom, edited by M. Mcdermott and B. Hand, 135–158. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wilmes, Sara E. D., and Christina Siry. 2021. “Multimodal Interaction Analysis: A Powerful Tool for Examining Plurilingual Students’ Engagement in Science Practices.” Research in Science Education 51 (1): 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09977-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar