Looking for the infant voice. How depth hermeneutics (scenic-narrative microanalysis) contributes to an understanding of how a child participates from the beginning of life

References

• Archard, P. J. (2020). Reflections on the completion of a psychoanalytically informed interview study involving children’s services professionals. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 21(3), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v21i3.1496
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, B. (2014). My journey in infant research and psychoanalysis: Microanalysis, a social microscope. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 31(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., Jaffe, J., Markese, S., Buck, K., Chen, H., Cohen, P., Bahrick, L., Andrews, H., & Feldstein, S. (2010). The origins of 12-month attachment: A microanalysis of 4-month mother–infant interaction. Attachment & Human Development, 12(1–2), 3–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730903338985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (2018). Beyond doer and done to. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bereswill, M., Morgenroth, C., & Redman, P. (2010). Alfred Lorenzer and the depth-hermeneutic method. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 15(3), 221–250. https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2010.12
   Google Scholar
• Bick, E. (1964). Notes on infant observation in psychoanalytic training. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 45, 558–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1970). Attention and interpretation. Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Blattmann, K., Hochberger, K., Lechat, K., Obens, K., Schmidt, S., Wittmann, L., & Hamburger, A. (2021). »Now Moments« im therapeutischen Dialog. Psyche, 75(11), 1053–1076. https://doi.org/10.21706/ps-75-11-1053
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, A. -M., & Williams, N. (Eds.). (2018). Further researching beneath the surface (vol 2). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, G. (2007). Framing narratives. In D. D. Hutto (Ed.), Narrative and understanding persons (pp. 17–42). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making. An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and The Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9
   Google Scholar
• Devereux, G. 1967. From anxiety to method in the behavioral sciences. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111667317.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2005). ”Reflexive embodied empathy”: A phenomenology of participant-researcher intersubjectivity. The Humanistic Psychologist, 33(4), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15473333thp3304_4
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious. S. E. 14.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh, S. (2010). Psychoanalysis outside the clinic. Pallgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gripsrud, B. H., Mellon, K., & Ramvi, E. (2018). Depth-hermeneutics: A psychosocial approach to facilitate teachers’ reflective practice? Reflective Practice, 19(5), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1538955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamburger, A. (2017). Scenic-narrative microanalysis. In D. Laub & A. Hamburger (Eds.), Psychoanalysis and holocaust testimony (pp. 166–182). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hingley-Jones, H., Parkinson, C., & Allain, L. (Eds.). (2017). Observation in health care & social care. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hollway, W. (2008). The importance of relational thinking in the practice of psycho-social research: Ontology, epistemology, methodology and ethics. In S. Clarke, H. Hahn, & P. Hoggett (Eds.), Object relations and social relations (pp. 137–162). Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Hollway, W. (2015). Knowing mothers. Researching maternal identity change. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137481238
   Google Scholar
• Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. (2014). Countertransference in qualitative research: A critical appraisal. Qualitative Research, 14(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. (2019). A practical psychoanalytic guide to reflexive research: The reverie research method. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467363
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, D., Forde, C., Martin, S., & Parkes, A. (2017). Children’s participation: Moving from the performative to the social. Children’s Geographies, 15(3), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1219022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultgren, F., & Johansson, B. (2018). Including babies and toddlers: A new model of participation. Children’s Geographies, 17(4), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1527016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, S. (2009). The use of self as a research tool. In S. Clarke & P. Hoggett (Eds.), Researching beneath the surface (pp. 145–166). Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (Ed.). (1989). Issues of validity in qualitative research. Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Laub, D., & Hamburger, A. (Eds.). (2017). Psychoanalysis and holocaust testimony. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leithäuser, T. (2013). Psychoanalysis, socialization, and society: The psychoanalytical thought and interpretation of Alfred Lorenzer. Historical Social Research, 38(2), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.38.2013.2.56-70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzer, A. (1970). Sprachzerstörung und Rekonstruktion: Vorarbeiten zu einer Metatheorie der Psychoanalyse. Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzer, A. (1986). Tiefenhermeneutische Kulturanalyse. In A. Lorenzer (Ed.), Kultur-Analysen: Psychoanalytische Studien zur Kultur (pp. 11–98). Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons-Ruth, K. (1999). The two-person unconscious: intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 19(4), 576–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351699909534267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenroth, C. (2021, June 3). Look at “me” and reflect on yourself. On self-reflection, introspection, and scenic understanding. [Conference paper]. Squid-Conference, Psycho-societal Methodology and Methods: Roots and Shoots.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, J. K. (2015). The newborn behavioral observations system (NBO) as a form of intervention and support for new parents. Zero to Three, 36(1), 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (1994). Subjects of analysis. Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Price, H., & Cooper, A. (2012). In the field: Psychoanalytic observation and epistemological realism. In C. Urwin & J. Sternberg (Eds.), Infant observation and research. Emotional processes in everyday lives (pp. 55–65). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reeder, J. (2002). Reflecting psychoanalysis: Narrative and resolve in the psychoanalytic experience. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rustin, M. J. (2012). Infant observation as a method of research. In C. Urwin & J. Sternberg (Eds.), Infant observation and research. Emotional processes in everyday lives (pp. 13–22). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rustin, M. J. (2019). Researching the unconscious. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salling-Olesen, H. S. (2013). The societal nature of subjectivity: An interdisciplinary methodological challenge. Historical Social Research, 38(2), 7–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salling-Olesen, H., & Leithäuser, T. (2018). Psycho-societal interpretation of the unconscious dimensions in everyday life. In K. Stamenova & R. D. Hinshelwood (Eds.), Methods of research into the unconscious. Applying psychoanalytic ideas to social science (pp. 70–86). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In M. Bullowa (Ed.), Before speech (pp. 321–347). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (2001). Intrinsic motives for companionship in understanding: Their origin, development, and significance for infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22, 95–131. doi:10.1002/1097-0355(200101/04)22:1<95:AID-IMHJ4>3.0.CO;2-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical application. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(1), 3–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulvik, O. S. (2015). Talking with children: Professional conversations in a participation perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 14(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014526923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Våpenstad, E. V. (2017). Attack and defence: From “attacks on linking” to “positive capability” in a child psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 34(3), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Våpenstad, E. V., & Bakkenget, B. (2021). Pre-verbal children’s participation in a new key. How intersubjectivity can contribute to understanding and implementation of child rights in early childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 668015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Bonsdorff, P. (2021). On equal terms? on implementing infants’ cultural rights. In E. E. Ødegaard & J. Spord Borgen (Eds.), Childhood cultures in transformation: 30 years of the UN convention on the rights of the child in action towards sustainability (pp. 37–53). Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004445666_003
   Google Scholar
• Winter, G. (2000). A comparative discussion of the notion of »validity« in qualitative and quantitative research. Qualitative Report, 4. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2000.2078
   Google Scholar