Publication Cover
Journal of Social Work Practice
Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community
Volume 37, 2023 - Issue 4
222
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The role of meeting management in group decision-making: lessons learnt from UK fostering and adoption panels

ORCID Icon
Pages 433-446 | Received 30 Sep 2022, Accepted 31 Mar 2023, Published online: 10 May 2023

References

  • Attia, M., & Edge, J. (2017). Be(com)ing a reflexive researcher: A developmental approach to research methodology. Open Review of Educational Research, 4(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1300068
  • Bagire, V., Byarugaba, J., & Kyogabiirwe, J. (2015). Organizational meetings: Management and benefits. Journal of Management Development, 34(8), 960–972. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-03-2014-0023
  • Baron, J. (1994). Thinking and deciding (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups and other papers. Tavistock Publications. [ Reprinted London: Routledge, 1989; London: Brunner-Routledge, 2001].
  • BodenHausen, G. V., & Wyer, R., Jr. (1985). Effects of stereotypes on decision-making and information processing strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 267–282.
  • Bornstein, B. H., & Greene, E. (2011). Jury decision making: Implications for and from psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410397282
  • Bornstein, B. H., & Miller, M. K. (2009). Does a judge’s religion influence decision making? Court Review, 45(3), 112–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195328677.003.006
  • Borthwick, S., & Lord, J. (2019). Effective fostering panels. CoramBAAF.
  • Carlson, K. A., & Russo, J. E. (2001). Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 7(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.7.2.91
  • Clifton, J., Horne, J., & Smith, C. (2014). Did birth relative attendance at adoption panels assist decision-making? Evaluating the Suffolk experience. Adoption & Fostering, 38(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308575913517999
  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage Publications.
  • De Bortoli, L., & Dolan, M. (2015). Decision making in social work with families and children: Developing decision-aids compatible with cognition. British Journal of Social Work, 45(7), 2142–2160. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu087
  • Fisher, D. D. V. (1991). An introduction to constructivism for social workers. Praeger.
  • Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin.
  • Ken, M., & Ramona, J. (1994). Meeting is such sweet sorrow. Management Decision, 32(4), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749410058707
  • Klein, G. A. (2017). Sources of power: How people make decisions (20th Anniversary ed.). MIT Press.
  • Lord, C., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarisation: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
  • Narey, M., & Owers, M. (2018). Foster care in England review. The Stationery Office. Retrieved December 28, 2019, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/679320/Foster_Care_in_England_Review.pdf
  • O’Sullivan, T. (2004). Inputs to an adoption panel: A case study. Adoption & Fostering, 28(3), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/030857590402800306
  • O’Sullivan, T. (2005). Processes and outputs of an adoption panel: A case study. Adoption & Fostering, 29(3), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/030857590502900304
  • O’Sullivan, T. (2011). Decision making in social work (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan (Practical social work series).
  • Pennie, P. (1993). Adoption panels – room for improvement. Adoption & Fostering, 17(2), 44–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/030857599301700210
  • Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Test of the story model for jury decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
  • Pepys, S., & Dix, J. (2000). Inviting applicants, birth parents and young people to attend adoption panel: How it works in practice. Adoption & Fostering, 24(4), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/030857590002400407
  • Pigott, M. A., & Foley, L. A. (1995). Social influence in jury decision making. Trial Diplomacy Journal, 18(2), 101–108. https://magnusweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Social-Influence-in-Jury-Decision-Making.pdf
  • Weekes, A. (2021). The biographic and professional influences on adoption and fostering panel members’ recommendation-making. Adoption & Fostering, 45(4), 382–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/03085759211058359
  • Wray, L. D., & Stone, E. R. (2005). The role of self-esteem and anxiety in decision-making for self versus others in relationships. Journal of Behavioural Decision-Making, 18(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.490

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.