High intensity focused ultrasound: Physical principles and devices

References

• Sapareto DG, Dewey WC. Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy. Br J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys Med 1984; 10: 787–800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewhirst MW, Viglianti BL, Lora-Michiels M, Hanson M, Hoopes PJ. Basic principles of thermal dosimetry and thermal thresholds for tissue damage from hyperthermia. Int J Hyperther 2003; 19: 267–294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosse E. Thermal ablation of benign and malignant tumours. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2006; 15: 2–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Han JK, Chang JM, Chung SY, Son KR, Kim SH, Lee JY, Choi BI. Radiofrequency renal ablation: In vivo comparison of internally cooled, multitined expandable and internally cooled perfusion electrodes. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17: 549–556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papagelopoulos PJ, Mavrogenis AF, Galanis EC, Kelekis NL, Wenger DE, Sim FH, Soucacos PN. Minimally invasive techniques in orthopedic oncology: Radiofrequency and laser thermal ablation. Orthopedics 2005; 28: 563–568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikfarjam M, Muralidharan V, Su K, Malcontenti-Wilson C, Christophi C. Patterns of heat shock protein (HSP70) expression and Kupffer cell activity following thermal ablation of liver and colorectal liver metastases. Int J Hyperther 2005; 21: 319–332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Han JK, Kim SH, Han CJ, An SK, Lee JY, Choi B. Wet radio-frequency ablation using multiple electrodes: Comparative study of bipolar versus monopolar modes in the bovine liver. Eur J Radiol 2005; 54: 408–417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onishi H, Matsushita M, Murakami T, Tono T, Okamoto S, Aoki Y, Iannaccone R, Hori M, Kim T, Osuga K, et al. MR appearances of radiofrequency thermal ablation region: Histopathologic correlation with dog liver models and an autopsy case. Acad Radiol 2004; 11: 1180–1189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galandi D, Antes G. Radiofrequency thermal ablation versus other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 2: CD003046
   Google Scholar
• Izzo F. Other thermal ablation techniques: Microwave and interstitial laser ablation of liver tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10: 491–497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puls R, Stroszczynski C, Gaffke G, Hosten N, Felix R, Speck U. Laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) of liver metastases: MR-guided percutaneous insertion of an MRI-compatible irrigated microcatheter system using a closed high-field unit. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 17: 663–670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng KK, Lam CM, Poon RT, Ai V, Tso WK, Fan ST. Thermal ablative therapy for malignant liver tumors: A critical appraisal. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 18: 616–629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacella CM, Bizzarri G, Magnolfi F, Cecconi P, Caspani B, Anelli V, et al. Laser thermal ablation in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: Results in 74 patients. Radiology 2001; 221: 712–720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata T, Niinobu T, Ogata N. Comparison of the effects of in-vivo thermal ablation of pig liver by microwave and radiofrequency coagulation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000; 7: 592–598
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warwick R, Pond JB. Trackless lesions in nervous tissues produced by high intensity focused ultrasound (High frequcncy mechanical waves). J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 102: 387–405
   Google Scholar
• Pond JB. The role of heat in the production of ultrasonic focal lesions. J Acoust Soc Am 1970; 47: 1607–1611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Haar GR, Robertson D. Tissue destruction with focused ultrasound in vivo. Eur Urol 1993; 23(Suppl. 1)8–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hynynen K, Colucci V, Chung A, Jolesz F. Noninvasive arterial-occlusion using mri-guided focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996; 22: 1071–1077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivens IH, Rowland IJ, Denbow M, Fisk N, ter Haar GR, Leach MO. Vascular occlusion using focused ultrasound surgery for use in fetal medicine. Eur J Ultrasound 1998; 00
   Google Scholar
• Susani M, Madersbacher S, Kratzik C, Vingers L, Marberger M. Morphology of tissue destruction induced by focused ultrasound. Eur Urol 1993; 23(Suppl. 1)34–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaezy S, Martin R, Yaziji H, Kaczkowski P, Keilman G, Carter S, Caps M, Chi EY, Bailey M, Crum L. Hemostasis of punctured blood vessels using high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998; 24: 903–910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezy S, Vaezy S, Starr F, Chi E, Cornejo C, Crum L, Martin RW. Intra-operative acoustic hemostasis of liver: Production of a homogenate for effective treatment. Ultrasonics 2005; 43: 265–269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezy S, Martin R, Kaczkowski P, Keilman G, Goldman B, Yaziji H, Carter S, Caps M, Crum L. Use of high-intensity focused ultrasound to control bleeding. J Vas Surg 1999; 29: 533–542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu F, Chen WZ, Bai J, Zou JZ, Wang ZL, Zhu H, Wang ZB. Pathological changes in human malignant carcinoma treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 1099–1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu F, Chen WZ, Bai J, Zou JZ, Wang ZL, Zhu H, Wang ZB. Tumor vessel destruction resulting from high-intensity focused ultrasound in patients with solid malignancies. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28: 535–542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang R, Sanghvi NT, Rescorla FJ, Kopecky KK, Grosfeld JL. Liver cancer ablation with extracorporeal high-intensity focused ultrasound. Eur Urol 1993; 23(Suppl. 1)17–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fallon J.Y. Stehbens WE, Eggleton RC. Effect of ultrasound on arteries. Arch Path 1972; 94: 380–388
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ishikawa T, Okai T, Sasaki K, Umemura S, Fujiwara R, Kushima M, Ichihara M, Ichizuha K. Functional and histological changes in rat femoral arteries by HIFU exposure. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 1471–1477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn JG, Zwemer RL, Chick AJ, Miller AE. A new method for the generation and use of focused ultrasound in experimental biology. J Gen Physiol 1942; 26: 179–192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ballantine HT, Bell E, Manlapaz J. Progress and problems in the neurological applications of focused ultrasound. J Neurosurg 1960; 17: 858–876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry WJ, Fry FJ. Fundamental neurological research and human neurosurgery using intense ultrasound. IRE Trans Biomed Electronics 1960; ME-7: 166–181
   Google Scholar
• Lynn JG, Putnam TJ. Histological and cerebral lesions prodcued by focused ultrasound. Am J Pathol 1944; 20: 637–649
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wall P.D, Fry WJ, Stephens R, Tucker D, Lettvin JY. Changes produced in the central nervous system by ultrasound. Science 1951; 114: 686–687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakay L, Hueter TF, Ballantine HT, Sosa D. Ultrasonically induced changes in the blood brain barrier. A M A Arch Neuro Psychiatr 1956; 00: 457–467
   Google Scholar
• Fry FJ, Johnson LK. Tumour irradiation with intense ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1978; 4: 337–341
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fry WJ, Barnard JW, Fry FJ, Krumins RF, Brennan JF. Ultrasonic lesions in the mammalian central nervous system. Science 1955; 122: 517–518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry FJ, Kossoff G, Eggleton RC, Dunn F. Threshold ultrasound dosages for structural changes in the mammalian brain. J Acoust Soc Am 1970; 48: 1413–1417
   Google Scholar
• Aubry JF, Tanter M, Pernot M, Thomas JL, Fink M. Experimental demonstration of noninvasive transskull adaptive focusing based on prior computed tomography scans. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 113: 84–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement GT, White J, Hynynen K. Investigation of a large-area phased array for focused ultrasound surgery through the skull. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45: 1071–1083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavine O, Langenstrass K, Bowyer C, Fox F, Griffing V, Thaler W. Effects of ultrasonic waves on the refractive media of the eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1952; 47: 204–209
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg RS, Purnell E. Effects of ultrasonic radiation on the ciliary body. Am J Ophthalmol 1967; 63: 403–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman DJ, Lizzi FL, El-Mofty AAM, Driller J, Franzen LA. Ultrasonically accelerated absorption of vitreous membranes. Am J Ophthalmol 1980; 89: 490–499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman DJ, Lizzi FL, Torpey JH, Burgess SEP, Driller J, Rosado AL, et al. Treatment of experimental lens capsular tears with intense focused ultrasound. Br J Ophthalmol 1985; 69: 645–649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman DJ, Lizzi FL, Driller J, Rosado AL, Burgess SEP, Torpey JH, Smith ME, Silverman RH, Yablonshi ME, Chang S, et al. Therapeutic ultrasound in the treatment of Glaucoma – II Clinical Applications. Ophthalmol 1985; 92: 347–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizzi FL, Coleman DJ, Driller J, Franzen LA, Jackobiec FA. Experimental ultrasonically induced lesions in the retina, choroid, and sclera. Invest Ophthal 1978; 17: 350–360
   Google Scholar
• Purnell E, Sokollu A, Torchia R, Taner N. Focal chorioretinitis produced by ultrasound. Invest Ophthal 1964; 3: 657–664
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coleman DJ, Lizzi FL, Driller J, Rosado AL, Chang S, Iwamoto T, et al. Therapeutic ultrasound in the treatment of Glaucoma – I Experimental Model. Ophthalmol 1985; 92: 339–346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman RH, Vogelsang B, Rondeau MJ, Coleman DJ. Therapeutic ultrasound for the treatment of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111: 327–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess SEP, Iwamoto T, Coleman DJ, Lizzi FL, Driller J, Rosado AL. Histological changes in porcine eyes treated with high intensity focused ultrasound. Ann Ophthalmol 1987; 19: 133–138
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lizzi FL, Coleman DJ, Driller J, Ostromogilsky M, Chang S, Grenall P. Ultrasonic hyperthermia for ophthalmic therapy. IEEE Trans Son Ultrason 1984; SU-31: 473–481
   Google Scholar
• Rosecan LR, Iwamoto T, Rosado AL, Lizzi FL, Coleman DJ. Therapeutic ultrasound in the treatment of retinal detachment: Clinical observation and light and electron microscopy. Retina 1985; 5: 115–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S. MRI-guided focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroids. Issues Emerg Health Technol 2005; 70: 1–4
   Google Scholar
• Tempany CM, Stewart EA, McDannold N, Quade BJ, Jolesz FA, Hynynen K. MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas: A feasibility study. Radiology 2003; 226: 897–905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N, Tempany CM, Fennessy FM, So MJ, Rybicki FJ, Stewart EA, et al. Uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging-based thermometry and thermal dosimetry during focused ultrasound thermal ablation. Radiology 2006; 240: 263–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He H-y, Lu L-l, Zhou Y-j, Nie Y-q. @ Clinical of study on curing leiomyoma with high intensity focused ultrasound. 1–1–2004; 37–41
   Google Scholar
• Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Margonari J, Theilliere Y, Gorry F, Souchon R, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound experimentation on human benign prostatic hypertrophy. Eur Urol 1993; 23: 44–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madersbacher S, Kratzik C, Susani M, Marberger M. Tissue ablation in benign prostatic hyperplasia with high intensity focused ultrasound. J Urol 1994; 152: 1956–1961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madersbacher S, Pedevilla M, Vingers L, Susani M, Marberger M. Effect of high intensity focused ultrasound on human prostate cancer in-vivo. Cancer Res 1995; 55: 3346–3351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan ED, Lynch TH, Mulvin D, Greene D, Smith JM, Fitzpatrick JM. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Br J Urol 1997; 79: 177–180
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanghvi NT, Fry FJ, Bihrle R, Foster RS, Phillips MH, Syrus J, Zaitsev AV, Hennige CW. Noninvasive surgery of prostate tissue by high-intensity focused ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferr 1996; 43: 1099–1110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan LD, McLoughlin MG, Goldenberg LG, Gleave ME, Marich KW. Early experience with high-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Br J Urol 1997; 79: 172–176
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madersbacher S, Schatzl G, Djavan B, Stulnig T, Marberger M. Long-term outcome of transrectal high- intensity focused ultrasound therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 2000; 37: 687–694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapelon JY, Gelet A, Souchon R, Pangaud C, Blanc E. Therapy using ultrasound: Application to localised prostate cancer. J D’Echographie et de Medecine Par Ultrasons 1998; 19: 260–264
   Google Scholar
• Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, Souchon R, Pangaud C, Abdelrahim AF, Cathignol D, Dubernard JM. Treatment of prostate cancer with transrectal focused ultrasound: Early clinical experience. Eur Urol 1996; 29: 174–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, Rouviere O, Lasne Y, Lyonnet D, Dubernard JM. Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound: Minimally invasive therapy of localized prostate cancer. J Endourol 2000; 14: 519–528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, Rouviere O, Lyonnet D, Dubernard JM. Transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: Factors influencing the outcome. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 124–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madersbacher S, Marberger M. High-energy shockwaves and extracorporeal high-intensity focused ultrasound. J Endourol 2003; 17: 667–672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beerlage HP, Thuroff S, Debruyne FMJ, Chaussy C, de la Rosette JJMC. Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound using the ablatherm device in the treatment of localized prostate carcinoma. Urology 1999; 54: 273–277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beerlage HP, van Leenders GJLH, Oosterhof GON, Witjes JA, Ruijter ET, van de Kaa CA, Debruyne FMJ. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) followed after one to two weeks by radical retropubic prostatectomy: Results of a prospective study. Prostate 1999; 39: 41–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaussy C, Thuroff S. High-intensity focused ultrasound in prostate cancer: Results after 3 years. Mol Urol 2000; 4: 179–182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaussy C, Thuroff S, dela Rosette JJMC. Results and side effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound in localized prostate cancer. J Endourol 2001; 15: 437–440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaussy C, Thuroff S. The status of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer and the impact of a combined resection. Curr Urol Rep 2003; 4: 248–252
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blana A, Walter B, Rogenhofer S, Wieland WF. High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 5-year experience. Urology 2004; 63: 297–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poissonnier L, Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, Rouviere O, Pangaud C, et al. Results of transrectal focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer (120 patients with PSA < or + 10 ng/ml). Prog Urol 2003; 13: 60–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blana A, Rogenhofer S, Ganzer R, Wild PJ, Wieland WF, Walter B. Morbidity associated with repeated transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 2006; 585–590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poissonnier L, Chapelon JY, Rouviere O, Curiel L, Bouvier R, Martin X, et al. Control of prostate cancer by transrectal HIFU in 227 Patients. Eur Urol 2006; 00
   Google Scholar
• Azzouz H, de la Rosette JJMC. HIFU: Local treatment of prostate cancer. EAU-EBU Update Series 2006; 4: 62–70
   Google Scholar
• Chaussy C, roff S, Rebillard X, Gelet A. Technology insight: High-intensity focused ultrasound for urologic cancers. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2005; 2: 191–198
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Poissonnier L, Bouvier R, Rouviere O, Curiel L, et al. Local recurrence of prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy: Early experience of salvage therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasonography. Urology 2004; 63: 625–629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaussy C, Thuroff S, Bergsdorf T. [Local recurrence of prostate cancer after curative therapy: HIFU (Ablatherm((R))) as a treatment option.]. Urologe A 2006; 45: 1271–1275
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kratzik C, Schatzl G, Lackner J, Marberger M. Transcutaneous high-intensity focused ultrasonography can cure testicular cancer in solitary testis. Urology 2006; 67: 1269–1273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamber J, ter Haar GR, Hill C. Physical Principles of medical Ultrasound. 2nd ed. Wiley, London 2004
   Google Scholar
• Hill CR. Optimum Acoustic Frequency for focused ultrasound surgery. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994; 20: 271–277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K, Watmough DJ, Mallard JR. The effects of some physical factors on the production of hyperthermia by ultrasound in neoplastic tissues. Radiat Environ Biophys 1981; 19: 215–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck F.A. Physical Properties of tissues: A comprehensive reference book. Academic Press, London 1990
   Google Scholar
• Goss SA, Johnston RL, Dunn F. Comprehensive compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 423–457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goss SA, Johnston RL, Dunn F. Compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues. II. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 93–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke RL, Bush NL, ter Haar GR. The changes in acoustic attenuation due to in vitro heating. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 127–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zderic V, Keshavarzi A, Andrew MA, Vaezy S, Martin RW. Attenuation of porcine tissues in vivo after high-intensity ultrasound treatment. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 61–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne JE, Ramnarine KV, Watson AJ, Hoskins PR. Assessment of the acoustic properties of common tissue-mimicking test phantoms. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 1053–1060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlew MM, Madsen EL, Zagzebski JA, Banjavic RA, Sum SW. A new ultrasound tissue-equivalent material. Radiology 1980; 134: 517–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafon C, Zderic V, Noble ML, Yuen JC, Kaczkowski PJ, Sapozhnikov OA, Chavrier F, Crum L, Vaezy S. Gel phantom for use in high-intensity focused ultrasound dosimetry. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 1383–1389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takegami K, Kaneko Y, Watanabe T, Maruyama T, Matsumoto Y, Nagawa H. Polyacrylamide gel containing egg white as new model for irradiation experiments using focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 1419–1422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, ter Haar GR, Hill CR, Dworkin M, Carnochan P, Young H, Bensted JPM. Effect of blood perfusion on the ablation of liver parenchyma with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Phys Med Biol 1993; 38: 1661–1673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Holt RG, Cleveland RO, Roy RA. Experimental validation of a tractable numerical model for focused ultrasound heating in flow-through tissue phantoms. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116: 2451–2458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennes HH. Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm. J Appl Phycol 1948; 1: 93–122
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton M.F, Blackstock DT. Nonlinear Acoustics. Academic Press, New York 1998
   Google Scholar
• Leighton T.G. The Acoustic Bubble. Academic Press, London 1994
   Google Scholar
• Coussios CC, Farny CH, ter Haar GR, Roy RA. Role of acoustic cavitation in the delivery and monitoring of cancer treatment by high-intensity focussed ultrasound. Int J Hyperther 2007, this issue
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt RG, Roy RA. Measurements of bubble-enhanced heating from focused, MHz-frequency ultrasound in a tissue-mimicking material. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 1399–1412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K. The threshold for thermally significant cavitiation in dog's thigh muscle in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991; 17: 157–169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khokhlova VA, Bailey MR, Reed JA, Cunitz BW, Kaczkowski PJ, Crum LA. Effects of nonlinear propagation, cavitation, and boiling in lesion formation by high intensity focused ultrasound in a gel phantom. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 119: 1834–1848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melodelima D, Chapelon JY, Theillere Y, Cathignol D. Combination of thermal and cavitation effects to generate deep lesions with an endocavitary applicator using a plane transducer: Ex vivo studies. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 103–111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey MR, Couret LN, Sapozhnikov OA, Khokhlova VA, ter Haar G, Vaezy S, Shi X, Martin R, Crum L. Use of overpressure to assess the role of bubbles in focused ultrasound lesion shape in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 695–708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabkin BA, Zderic V, Vaezy S. Hyperecho in ultrasound images of HIFU therapy: Involvement of cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 947–956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Roy RA, Holt RG. Bubble dynamics and size distributions during focused ultrasound insonation. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116: 3423–3431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunt MJ, Ashley B. A simple radiation balance for measuring ultrasonic power. J Med Eng Technol 1979; 3: 194–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston RC. Output Measurement for Medical Ultrasound. Springer-Verlag, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Shaw A. Delivering the right dose. Conference series: Advanced metrology for ultrasound in medicine. J Phys 2004; 1: 174–179
   Google Scholar
• Lewin PA, Bautista R, Devaraju V. Voltage sensitivity response of ultrasonic hydrophones in the frequency range 0.25–2.5 MHz. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 1131–1137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin PA, Barrie-Smith N, Ide M, Hynynen K, Macdonald M. Interlaboratory acoustic power measurement. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 207–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin PA, Mu C, Umchid S, Daryoush A, El Sherif M. Acousto-optic, point receiver hydrophone probe for operation up to 100 MHz. Ultrasonics 2005; 43: 815–821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunt MJ, Ashley B. A simple radiation balance for measuring ultrasonic power. J Med Eng Technol 1979; 3: 194–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer ME. Cost-effective shock wave hydrophones. J Stone Dis 1993; 5: 73–76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shotton KC, Bacon DR, Quilliam RM. A pvdf membrane hydrophone for operation in the range 0.5 Mhz to 15 Mhz. Ultrasonics 1980; 18: 123–126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill CR, Rivens IH, Vaughan MG, ter Haar GR. Lesion development in focused ultrasound surgery: A general model. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994; 20: 259–269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill CR, Rivens IH, Vaughan MG, ter Haar GR. Lesion development in focused ultrasound surgery: A general model. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994; 20: 259–269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapareto SA, Dewey WC. Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1984; 10: 787–800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivens I, Shaw A, Civale J, Morris M. Treatment Monitoring & Thermometryfor Therapeutic Focused Ultrasound. Int J Hyperther 2007, this issue
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezy S, Zderic V. Haemorrhage control using high intensity focused ultrasound. Int J Hyperther 2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry FJ. Precision high intensity focused ultrasonic machines for surgery. Am J Phys Med 1958; 37: 152–156
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chapelon JY, Cathignol D, Cain C, Ebbini E, Kluiwstra JU, Sapozhnikov OA, Fleury G, Berriet R, Chupin L, Guey JL. New piezoelectric transducers for therapeutic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26: 153–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke RL. Modification of intensity distributions from large aperture ultrasound sources. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995; 21: 353–363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cline HE, Hynynen K, Watkins RD, Adams WJ, Schenck JF, Ettinger RH, Freund WR, Vetro JP, Jolesz FA. Focused US system for MR imaging—guided tumour ablation. Radiology 1995; 194: 731–737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daum DR, Smith NB, King R, Hynynen K. In vivo demonstration of noninvasive thermal surgery of the liver and kidney using an ultrasonic phased array. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 1087–1098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupenloup F, Chapelon JY, Cathignol DJ, Sapozhnikov OA. Reduction of the grating lobes of annular arrays used in focused ultrasound surgery. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Cont 1996; 43: 991–998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjield T, Silcox CE, Hynynen K. Low-profile lenses for ultrasound surgery. Phys Med Biol 1999; 44: 1803–1813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goss SA, Frizzell LA, Kouzmanoff JT, Barich JM, Yang JM. Sparse random ultrasound phased-array for focal surgery. IEEE Transactions on Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Cont 1996; 43: 1111–1121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker A, Chauhan S, Peters K, Hildenbrand R, Marlinghaus E, Alken P, Michel MS. Multiple high-intensity focused ultrasound probes for kidney-tissue ablation. J Endourol 2005; 19: 1036–1040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held R, Nguyen TN, Vaezy S. Transvaginal 3D image-guided high intensity focused ultrasound array. Applied Physics Laboratory. University of Washington, Seattle, WA 2005, United States: Kyoto
   Google Scholar
• Hynynen K, Chung A, Fjield T, Buchanan M, Daum D, Colucci V, et al. Feasibility of using ultrasound phased-arrays for MRI monitored noninvasive surgery. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Cont 1996; 43: 1043–1053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohrmann KU, Michel MS, Steidler A, Marlinghaus E, Kraut O, Alken P. Technical characterization of an ultrasound source for noninvasive thermoablation by high-intensity focused ultrasound. BJU Int 2002; 90: 248–252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki K, Azuma T, Kawabata KI, Shimoda M, Kokue EI, Umemura SI. Effect of split-focus approach on producing larger coagulation in swine liver. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 591–599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan H, Vanbaren P, Ebbini ES, Cain CA. Ultrasound surgery – comparison of strategies using phased-array systems. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Cont 1996; 43: 1085–1098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton I, Rivens I, ter Haar G, Gilderdale D, Collins D, Hand J, Abel P, deSouza N. Design and development of a prototype endocavitary probe for high intensity focused ultrasound delivery with magnetic resonance imaging thermometry and guidance. JMRI 2007, in press
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller NR, Bamber JC, ter Haar GR. Imaging of temperature-induced echo strain: Preliminary in vitro study to assess feasibility for guiding focused ultrasound surgery. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 345–356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller NR, Bamber JC, Meaney PM. Fundamental limitations of noninvasive temperature imaging by means of ultrasound echo strain estimation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28: 1319–1333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller NR, Bograchev KM, Bamber JC. Ultrasonic temperature imaging for guiding focused ultrasound surgery: Effect of angle between imaging beam and therapy beam. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 401–413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand A, Kaczkowski PJ. Monitoring formation of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) induced lesions using backscattered ultrasound. Acoustic Research Letters Online 2004; 5: 88–94
   Google Scholar
• Andreou C, Blana A, Orovan W, Hassouna M, Warner J, Woods E. Technical review: High-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer. Can J Urol 2005; 12: 2684–2685
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christopher T. HIFU focusing efficiency and a twin annular array source for prostate treatment. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2005; 52: 1523–1533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curiel L, Chavrier F, Souchon R, Birer A, Chapelon JY. 1.5-D high intensity focused ultrasound array for non-invasive prostate cancer surgery. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2002; 49: 231–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebillard X, Gelet A, Davin JL, Soulie M, Prapotnich D, Cathelineau X, et al. Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Endourol 2005; 19: 693–701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh KY, Smith NB. A 63 element 1.75 dimensional ultrasound phased array for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Biomed Eng Online 2005; 4: 39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seip R, Chen W, Carlson R, Frizzell L, Buffet C, Cathignol D. Annular and cylindrical phased array geometries for transrectal High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) using PZT and piezocomposite materials. 2004; 229–232, Proc ISTU4 AIP
   Google Scholar
• Lafon C, Chapelon JY, Prat F, Gorry F, Margonari J, Theillere Y, Cathignol D. Design and preliminary results of an ultrasound applicator for interstitial thermal coagulation. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998; 24: 113–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prat F, Lafon C, Margonari J, Gorry F, Theillere Y, Chapelon JY, Cathignol D. A high-intensity US probe designed for intraductal tumor destruction: Experimental results. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 388–392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prat F, Lafon C, Melodelima D, Theillere J-Y, Fritsch J, Pelletier G, Buffet C, Cathignol D. Endoscopic treatment of cholangiocarcinoma and carcinoma of the duodenal papilla by intraductal high-intensity US: Results of a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 909–915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prat F, Lafon C, Theillere J-Y, Fritsch J, Choury A-D, Lorand I, Cathignol D. Destruction of bile duct carcinoma by intraductal high intensity ultrasound during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 797–800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melodelima D, Salomir R, Mougenot C, Moonen C, Cathignon D. In vivo experiments with intraluminal ultrasound applicator compatible with “real-time” MR temperature mapping, designed for oesophagus tumour ablation 2005; 185–187, Proc ISTU4 AIP
   Google Scholar
• Melodelima D, Salomir R, Chapelon JY, re Y, Moonen C, Cathignol D. Intraluminal high intensity ultrasound treatment in the esophagus under fast MR temperature mapping: In vivo studies. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 975–982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makin I, Faikin W, Mast D, Runk M, Slayton M, Barthe M. Conformal bulk ablation and therapy monitoring using intracorporeal image-Treat Ultrasound Arrays 2005; 27–29, Proc ISTU4AIP
   Google Scholar
• Murat F, Lafon C, Gelet A, Martin X, Cathignol D. Bloodless partial nephrectomy through application of non-focused high-intensity ultrasound 2005; 181–184, Proc ISTU4 AIP
   Google Scholar
• Wu F, Wang ZB, Chen WZ, Zou JZ, Bai J, Zhu H, Li JQ, Jin CB, Xie FL, Su HB. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation combined with transcatheter arterial embolization. Radiology 2005; 235: 659–667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illing RO, Kennedy JE, Wu F, ter Haar GR, Protheroe AS, Friend PJ, Gleeson FV, Cranston DW, Phillips RR, Middleton MR. The safety and feasibility of extracorporeal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of liver and kidney tumours in a Western population. Br J Cancer 2005; 93: 890–895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu F, Wang ZB, Zhu H, Chen WZ, Zou JZ, Bai J, Li JQ, Jin CB, Xie FL, Su HB. Extracorporeal high intensity focused ultrasound treatment for patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 92: 51–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Wang Z, Wu F, Zhu H, Zou J, Bai J, Li JQ, Xie FL. High intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of primary malignant bone tumor. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 2002; 24: 612–615
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu F, Wang ZB, Zhu H, Chen WZ, Zou JZ, Bai J, Li JQ, Jin CB, Xie FL, Su HB. Feasibility of US-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: Initial experience. Radiology 2005; 236: 1034–1040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanghvi NT, Foster RS, Bihrle R, Casey R, Uchida T, Phillips MH, Syrus J, Zaitsev AV, Marich WN, Fry FJ. Noninvasive surgery of prostate tissue by high intensity focused ultrasound: An updated report. Eur J Ultrasound 1999; 9: 19–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU). for the treatment of localized prostate cancer using sonablate-500. Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, KyotoJapan 2005, 04 Sep 18; Department of Urology
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Bian D, Chen W, Zhao C, Yin N, Wang Z. Focused ultrasound therapy of vulvar dystrophies: A feasibility study. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 915–921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Farny CH, Coussios CC, Roy RR, Holt RG. Dynamics and control of cavitation during high-intensity focused ultrasound application. Acoust Res Lett Onl 2005; 6: 182–187
   Google Scholar