Establishing new housing commons in Vienna in the context of translocal networks

References

• Aernouts, N. & Ryckewaert, M. (2017) Beyond housing: on the role of commoning in the establishment of a Community Land Trust project, International Journal of Housing Policy, 18, pp. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aernouts, N. & Ryckewaert, M. (2018) Reproducing housing commons. Government involvement and differential commoning in a housing cooperative, Housing Studies, 34, pp. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. & Thrift, N. (2002) Cities: Reimagining the Urban (Cambridge: Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Angotti, T. (2008) New York for Sale. Community Planning Confronts Global Real Estate (Cambridge: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Barthel, B. (2020) Legal hacking und seine praktischen dimensionen. Mietshäuser syndikat (und HabiTAT) als housing commons, Zeitschrift für kritik - recht - gesellschaft, pp. 366–375.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, E., Heindl, G. & Platzer, M. (2019) Architektur und Politik – Lernen vom Roten Wien – Debatte, in: W. M. Schwarz, G. Spitaler, E. Wikidal, & Wien Museum (Eds), Das Rote Wien, 1919-1934: Ideen, Debatten, Praxis, pp. 158–165 (Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (2008) Enclosure, common right and the property of the poor, Social & Legal Studies, 17, pp. 311–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. (2017) Reinventing law for the commons, in: M. Scanlan (Ed), Law and Policy for a New Economy, pp. 137–164 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Bonfert, B. (2021) 'The real power must be in the base'–Decentralised collective intellectual leadership in the European action coalition for the right to housing and to the city, Capital & Class, 45, pp. 523–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnihan, P. & Byrne, M. (2015) Escape into the city: Everyday practices of commoning and the production of urban space in Dublin, Antipode, 47, pp. 36–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce, S. (2016) Pursuing urban commons: Politics and alliances in community land trust activism in East London, Antipode, 48, pp. 134–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce, S. (2020) Engagement and activism in community land ownership: The emergence of community land trusts in London and Toronto, in: S. Bunce, N. Livingstone, L. March, S. Moore, & A. Walks (Eds), Critical Dialogues of Urban Governance, Development and Activism London and Toronto., pp. 274–288 (London: UCL Press).
   Google Scholar
• Caniëls, M. C. J. & Romijn, H. A. (2008) Actor networks in strategic niche management: Insights from social network theory, Futures, 40, pp. 613–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumbers, A. (2015) Constructing a global commons in, against and beyond the state, Space and Polity, 19, pp. 62–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumbers, A., Routledge, P. & Nativel, C. (2008) The entangled geographies of global justice networks, Progress in Human Geography, 32, pp. 183–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czischke, D. (2018) Collaborative housing and housing providers: towards an analytical framework of multi-stakeholder collaboration in housing co-production, International Journal of Housing Policy, 18, pp. 55–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFilippis, J., Williams, O. R., Pierce, J., Martin, D. G., Kruger, R. & Esfahani, A. H. (2019) On the transformative potential of community land trusts in the United States, Antipode, 51, pp. 795–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. & Diani, M. (2006) Individuals, networks, and participation, in: Social Movements: An Introduction, 2nd ed., pp. 115–134 (Oxford: Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. W. (2004) Measuring Social Capital: An Australian Framework and Indicators (Canberra).
   Google Scholar
• Ertl, E. & Humer, F. (2016) Machs dir doch selbst! Das mietshäuser syndikat in österreich, Dérive - Zeitschrift Für Stadtforschung, 63, pp. 42–44.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, D. (2003) Spatialities of transnational resistance to globalization: the maps of grievance of the inter-continental caravan, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28, pp. 404–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreri, M. & Vidal, L. (2021) Public-cooperative policy mechanisms for housing commons, International Journal of Housing Policy, 22, pp. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froschauer, U. & Lueger, M. (2003) Das Qualitative Interview (Wien u.a.: UTB).
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2018) Collective Self-Help, Financial Inclusion, and the Commons: Searching for Solutions to Accra's Housing Crisis, Housing Policy Debate, 28, pp. 64–78.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973) The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78, pp. 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, E. (2015) Nutzen statt besitzen, RaumPlanung, 179, pp. 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, E. & Lang, R. (2018) Collaborative Housing models in Vienna through the lens of social innovation, in: G. van Bortel, V. Gruis, J. Nieuwenhuijzen, & B. Pluijmers (Eds), Affordable Housing Governance and Finance: Innovations, Partnerships and Comparative Perspectives, pp. 41–58 (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Hanke, M. (2019) Photograph of Bikes and Rails. (unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (1996) Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange, Library & Information Science Research, 18, pp. 323–342.
   Google Scholar
• Hejda, W., Hirschmann, A., Kiczka, R., & Verlič, M. (Eds) (2014) Wer Geht Leer Aus? Plädoyer Für Eine Andere Leerstandspolitik (Wien: edition mono/monochrom).
   Google Scholar
• Helfrich, S. & Bollier, D. (2015) INTERMEZZO II die innenwelt der außenwelt: Über commons und commoning, in: Die Welt Der Commons, pp. 262–264 (Bielefeld: Transcript).
   Google Scholar
• Herz, A., Peters, L. & Truschkat, I. (2015) How to do qualitative structural analysis: the qualitative interpretation of network maps and narrative interviews, Forum Qualitative Social Research, 16, pp. 9.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, A. (2016) Local Housing, Community Living: Prospects for Scaling up and Scaling out Community-Led Housing (London: Smith-Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, S. (2012) The return of the housing question, Ephemera, 12, pp. 423–444.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, A., Kravets, A., Laimer, C. & Steinfeld, J. (2021) Bausteine für ein Neues soziales Wohnen, in: Gemeinschaftliches Wohnen Und Selbstorganisiertes Bauen, pp. 229–244 (Wien: TU Wien Academic Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hölzl, C. (2022) Translocal mobilization of housing commons. The example of the german mietshäuser syndikat, Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4, pp. 759332.
   Google Scholar
• Interreg NWE (Ed) (2021) Case Studies Community Land Trusts in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, A., McFarlane, C. & Vasudevan, A. (2012) Rethinking enclosure: Space, subjectivity and the commons, Antipode, 44, pp. 1247–1267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadi, J. (2015) Recommodifying housing in formerly “red” Vienna?, Housing, Theory and Society, 32, pp. 247–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazepov, Y. & Verwiebe, R. (2022) (Eds) Vienna: Still a Just City? (New York, NY: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Kerbler, M. (2017, May 27) Bikes & Rails: Wohnbau nicht von der Stange, Available at https://derstandard.at/2000058228977/Bikes-Rails-Wohnbau-nicht-von-der-Stange (accessed 16 May 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Kip, M. (2015) Moving beyond the City: Conceptualizing Urban Commons from a Critical Urban Studies Perspective, in: M. Dellenbaugh, M. Kip, M. Bieniok, A. K. Müller, & M. Schwegmann (Eds), Urban Commons: Moving Beyond Market and State, pp. 42–59 (Berlin u.a.: Birkhäuser Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• König, B. (2004) Stadtgemeinschaften: Das Potenzial Der Wohnungsgenossenschaften Für Die Soziale Stadtentwicklung (Berlin: edition sigma).
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., Carriou, C. & Czischke, D. (2018) Collaborative Housing Research (1990–2017): A systematic review and thematic analysis of the field, Housing, Theory and Society, 37, pp. 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R., Chatterton, P. & Mullins, D. (2020) Grassroots innovations in community-led housing in England: the role and evolution of intermediaries, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 12, pp. 52–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R. & Novy, A. (2014) Cooperative housing and social cohesion: the role of linking social Capital, European Planning Studies, 22, pp. 1744–1764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R. & Stoeger, H. (2018) The role of the local institutional context in understanding collaborative housing models: empirical evidence from Austria, International Journal of Housing Policy, 18, pp. 35–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levkoe, C. Z. (2015) Strategies for forging and sustaining social movement networks: a case study of provincial food networking organizations in Canada, Geoforum, 58, pp. 174–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. (2013) Multiscalar mobilization for a just city: New Spatial Politics of Urban Movements, in: W. Nicholls, B. Miller, & J. Beaumont (Eds), Spaces of Contention. Spatialities and Social Movements, pp. 163–196 (Farnham: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. & Ward, K. (2012) Assembling urbanism: following policies and 'studying through' the sites and situations of policy making, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 44, pp. 42–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2009) Translocal assemblages: space, power and social movements, Geoforum, 40, pp. 561–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2011) Learning the City: Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage (Malden: Wiley-Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Melzer, H. (2013, October 18) Sozialer Wohnbau EU: Was heißt hier günstig wohnen?, Available at https://www.wohnnet.at/business/branchen-news/sozialer-wohnbau-10409 (accessed 19 May 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Meuser, M. & Nagel, U. (2005) ExpertInneninterviews - vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht, in: Bogner, Littig, & Menz (Eds), Das Experteninterview. Theorie, Methode, Anwendung, 2nd ed., pp. 71–93 (Wiesbaden: Leske + Budrich).
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. & McKee, K. (2012) Empowering local communities? An international review of community land trusts, Housing Studies, 27, pp. 280–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T. & Mullins, D. (2013) Scaling-up or going viral? Comparing self-help housing and community land trust facilitation, Voluntary Sector Review, 4, pp. 333–353.
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, D. (2018) Achieving policy recognition for community-based housing solutions: the case of self-help housing in England, International Journal of Housing Policy, 18, pp. 143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullins, D. & Moore, T. (2018) Self-organised and civil society participation in housing provision, International Journal of Housing Policy, 18, pp. 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, W. (2009) Place, networks, space: Theorising the geographies of social movements, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34, pp. 78–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noterman, E. (2016) Beyond Tragedy: Differential Commoning in a Manufactured Housing Cooperative, Antipode, 48(2), pp. 433–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz, L. M. (2017) Will Limited-Equity Cooperatives Make a Comeback?,. Available at https://shelterforce.org/2017/04/25/will-limited-equity-co-ops-make-comeback/ (accessed 16 March 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. & Ahn, T. K. (2008) The Meaning of Social Capital and Its Link to Collective Action, in: G. T. Svendsen & Svendsen (Eds), Handbook on Social Capital (Bloomington: Edward Elgar Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Penninger, D. (2020) Schöner leben ohne reihenhaus!, zeitschrift für kritik | recht | gesellschaft, 2020, pp. 376–384.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, P. R. (2006) Social capital as a capacity for collective action, in: Assessing Social Capital: Concept, Policy, Practice, pp. 53–69 (Cambridge: CUP).
   Google Scholar
• Pruijt, H. D. (2014) The Power of the Magic Key. Scalability of squatting in the Netherlands and the US, in: M. Cattaneo & M. A. Martínez (Eds), The Squatters' Movement in Euope. Commons and Autonomy as Alternatives to Capitalism, pp. 110–135 (London: Pluto Press).
   Google Scholar
• Raynor, K. (2018) Assembling an innovative social housing project in Melbourne: mapping the potential for social innovation, Housing Studies, 34, pp. 1263–1285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinprecht, C. (2017) Kommunale Strategien für bezahlbaren Wohnraum: Das Wiener Modell oder die Entzauberung einer Legende, in: B. Schönig, J. Kadi, & S. Schipper (Eds), Wohnraum Für Alle?! Perspektiven Auf Planung, Politik Und Architektur, pp. 213–230 (Bielefeld: Transcript).
   Google Scholar
• Reven-Holzmann, A. (2019) 10 Jahre „Soziale Nachhaltigkeit“ Bestandsaufnahme Und Ausblick (Wien: Wohnfonds Wien).
   Google Scholar
• Riederer, B., Verwiebe, R. & Seewann, L. (2019) Changing social stratification in Vienna: Why are migrants declining from the Middle of society?, Population, Space and Place, 25, pp. e2215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routledge, P., Cumbers, A. & Nativel, C. (2013) Global Justice Networks: Operational Logics, Imagineers and Grassrooting Vectors, in: W. Nicholls, B. Miller, & J. Beaumont (Eds), Spaces of Contention. Spatialities and Social Movements, pp. 261–284 (Farnham: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, M., Engelsman, U. & Southern, A. (2016) Community land trusts - A radical or reformist response to The Housing Question today?, ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 15, pp. 590–615.
   Google Scholar
• Schöne, H. (2003) Die teilnehmende beobachtung als datenerhebungsmethode in der politikwissenschaft. Methodologische reflexion und werkstattbericht, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 30, pp. 168–199.
   Google Scholar
• Schlo, R. (2018) The SchloR utilization concept developed and provided by Gabu Heindl Architektur & Städtebau.
   Google Scholar
• Schlo, R. (2019) Photograph of the project site.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, H., Kousoulas, S. & Bruyns, G. (2015) Commoning as differentiated publicness, Footprint, 9, pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrides, S. (2015) Common space as threshold space: Urban commoning in struggles to Re-Appropriate public space, Footprint, 9, pp. 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Szreter, S. & Woolcock, M. (2004) Health by association? Social Capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health, International Journal of Epidemiology, 33, pp. 650–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (2018) From Co-Ops to community land trusts: Tracing the historical evolution and policy mobilities of collaborative housing movements, housing, Theory and Society, 37, pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (2020) Reconstructing Public Housing: Liverpool's Hidden History of Collective Alternatives (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, M. (2018) 'Weil Es Nur Zusammen Geht': Commons-Basierte Selbstorganisation in Der Leipziger Hausprojekteszene (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• wien.at-Redaktion (n.d.) Neue Flächenwidmung für geförderten Wohnbau, Available at https://www.wien.gv.at/bauen-wohnen/bauordnungsnovelle-gefoerderter-wohnbau.html (accessed 17 February 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Winterer, M. (2019, October 6) Wie die Stadt Wien ihre Bürger mit Liebe erdrückt, Wiener Zeitung.
   Google Scholar