Co-developing sustainability – a consumer-inclusive approach to wooden housing business in Finland

References

• Autio, M. & Autio, J. (2013) Consumers purchasing new homes – trust and taste building through e-service and competence in the housing market, International Journal of Services, Economics and Management, 5, pp. 328–340.
   Google Scholar
• Bäcklund, P., Kallio, K. P. & Häkli, J. (2014) Residents, customers or citizens? Tracing the idea of youthful participation in the context of administrative reforms in Finnish public administration, Planning Theory & Practice, 15, pp. 311–327.
   Google Scholar
• Baldassarre, B., Calabretta, G., Bocken, N. M. P. & Jaskiewicz, T. (2017) Bridging sustainable business model innovation and user-driven innovation: A process for sustainable value proposition design, Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, pp. 175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, M. (1999) Chasing a snail: Innovation and housebuilding firms’ strategies, Housing Studies, 14, pp. 9–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, M. (2003) Markets and the structure of the housebuilding industry: An international perspective, Urban Studies, 40, pp. 897–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, J. & Ozaki, R. (2003) Achieving ‘customer focus’ in private housebuilding: Current practice and lessons from other industries, Housing Studies, 18, pp. 87–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, S. & Harris, K. (2008) Consumers as resource integrators, Journal of Marketing Management, 24, pp. 113–130.
   Google Scholar
• Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P. & Evans, S. (2014) A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes, Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, pp. 42–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branstad, A. & Solem, B. A. (2020) Emerging theories of consumer-driven market innovation, adoption, and diffusion: A selective review of consumer-oriented studies, Journal of Business Research, 116, pp. 561–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuer, H. & Ketabdar, H. (2012) User-driven business model innovation—new formats and methods in business modeling and interaction design, and the case of magitact, in: P. Kommers & P. Isaias (Eds) Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on E-Society, pp. 211–218 (Berlin: IADIS Press).
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, H., Fichter, K., Lüdeke-Freund, F. & Tiemann, I. (2018) Sustainability-oriented business model development: Principles, criteria and tools, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10, pp. 256–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse, M. & Siebert, R. (2018) The role of consumers in food innovation processes, European Journal of Innovation Management, 21, pp. 20–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, D. & Roy, R. (2004) Developing a customer-focused culture in the speculative house-building industry, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15, pp. 73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easthope, H. (2004) A place called home, housing, Theory and Society, 21, pp. 128–138.
   Google Scholar
• Easthope, H. (2014) Making a rental property home, Housing Studies, 29, pp. 579–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, J., Glad, W. & Johansson, M. (2015) User involvement in Swedish residential building projects: A stakeholder perspective, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 30, pp. 313–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes, C. & Hagberg, J. (2013) Socio‐cultural retailing: What can retail marketing learn from this interdisciplinary field?, International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 5, pp. 290–308.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, M. (2011) Making home: A study of young men’s lodgings and related consumption in the 21st century [Dissertation] (Gothenburg: BAS Publisher).
   Google Scholar
• Gold, S. & Rubik, F. (2009) Consumer attitudes towards timber as a construction material and towards timber frame houses–selected findings of a representative survey among the german population, Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, pp. 303–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J., Korsunova, A. & Halme, M. (2017) Our collaborative future: Activities and roles of stakeholders in Sustainability-Oriented innovation, Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, pp. 731–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gram-Hanssen, K. (2011) Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption, Journal of Consumer Culture, 11, pp. 61–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromark, S., Andersson, B. & Braide, A. (2021) Explorations on residential resilience: Brf Viva 2011-2019, in: J. Fokdal, O. Bina, P. Chiles, L. Ojamäe, & K. Paadam (Eds) Enabling the City: Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Encounters in Research and Practice, 1st ed., pp. 81–95 (New York: Routledge). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429297649
   Google Scholar
• Hand, M., Shove, E. & Southerton, D. (2007) Home extensions in the United Kingdom: Space, time, and practice, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, pp. 668–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, E. N. (2010) The role of innovation in the Forest products industry, Journal of Forestry, 108, pp. 348–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. & Kjellberg, H. (2016) How users shape markets, Marketing Theory, 16, pp. 445–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegger, D. L. T., Spaargaren, G., Van Vliet, B. J. M. & Frijns, J. (2011) Consumer-inclusive innovation strategies for the dutch water supply sector: Opportunities for more sustainable products and services, NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 58, pp. 49–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinonen, K., Strandvik, T., Mickelsson, K. J., Edvardsson, B., Sundström, E. & Andersson, P. (2010) A customer-dominant logic of service, Journal of Service Management, 21, pp. 531–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., Jarvela, K., Pulliainen, A., Saastamoinen, M. & Timonen, P. (2008) Qualitative research and consumer policy: Focus group discussions as a form of consumer participation, Qualitative Report, 13, pp. 152–172.
   Google Scholar
• Høibø, O., Hansen, E. & Nybakk, E. (2015) Building material preferences with a focus on wood in urban housing: Durability and environmental impacts, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 45, pp. 1617–1627.
   Google Scholar
• Høibø, O., Hansen, E., Nybakk, E. & Nygaard, M. (2018) Preferences for urban building materials: Does building culture background matter?, Forests, 9, pp. 504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansma, S. R., Dijkstra, A. M. & de Jong, M. D. (2022) Co-creation in support of responsible research and innovation: An analysis of three stakeholder workshops on nanotechnology for health, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 9, pp. 28–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, L. B. & Molin, M. J. (2003) Consumers as co-developers: Learning and innovation outside the firm, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15, pp. 363–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jussila, J. & Lähtinen, K. (2020) Effects of institutional practices on delays in construction–views of finnish homebuilder families, Housing Studies, 35, pp. 1167–1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriese, U. & Scholz, R. W. (2011) The positioning of sustainability within residential property marketing, Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 48, pp. 1503–1527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähtinen, K., Harju, C. & Toppinen, A. (2019) Consumers’ perceptions on the properties of wood affecting their willingness to live in and prejudices against houses made of timber, Wood Material Science & Engineering, 14, pp. 325–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larasatie, P., Guerrero, J., Conroy, K., Hall, T., Hansen, E. & Needham, M. (2018) What does the public believe about tall wood buildings? An exploratory study in the US Pacific Northwest, Journal of Forestry, 116, pp. 429–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lettenmeier, M., Liedtke, C. & Rohn, H. (2014) Eight tons of material footprint—Suggestion for a resource cap for household consumption in Finland, Resources, 3, pp. 488–515.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, L., Trindade, E., Alencar, L., Alencar, M. & Silva, L. (2021) Sustainability in the construction industry: A systematic review of the literature, Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, pp. 125730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, W., Kanzaki, M. & Matsushita, K. (2017) Promoting green buildings: Do chinese consumers care about green building enhancements?, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41, pp. 545–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, W., Mineo, K., Matsushita, K. & Kanzaki, M. (2018) Consumer willingness to pay for modern wooden structures: A comparison between China and Japan, Forest Policy and Economics, 91, pp. 84–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P. (2021) Towards an anticipatory public engagement methodology: Deliberative experiments in the assembly of possible worlds using focus groups, Qualitative Research, 21, pp. 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. M. & Schouten, J. W. (2014) Consumption-driven market emergence, Journal of Consumer Research, 40, pp. 855–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, L. (2020) Homeless women, material objects and home (un)making, Housing Studies, 35, pp. 1309–1331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mont, O., Plepys, A., Whalen, K. & Nußholz, J. L. (2017) Business model innovation for a Circular Economy: Drivers and barriers for the Swedish industry–the voice of REES companies. Available at https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/ws/files/33914256/MISTRA_REES_Drivers_and_Barriers_Lund.pdf (accessed 21 December 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L. & Zoran, A. G. (2009) A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, pp. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ottelin, J., Amiri, A., Steubing, B. & Junnila, S. (2021) Comparative carbon footprint analysis of residents of wooden and non-wooden houses in Finland, Environmental Research Letters, 16, pp. 074006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantzar, M. & Shove, E. (2010) Understanding innovation in practice: A discussion of the production and re-production of nordic walking, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22, pp. 447–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pynnönen, M., Hallikas, J. & Ritala, P. (2012) Managing customer-driven business model innovation, International Journal of Innovation Management, 16, pp. 1250022–1250018.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, K. & Voß, G. G. (2010) The working customer—An emerging new type of consumer, Psychology of Everyday Activity, 3, pp. 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Rinkinen, J. & Jalas, M. (2017) Moving home: Houses, new occupants and the formation of heating practices, Building Research & Information, 45, pp. 293–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenwitz, M., Naim, M. & Potter, A. (2012) The nature of choice in mass customized house building, Construction Management and Economics, 30, pp. 203–219.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, P. (1997) The social construction of home, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 14, pp. 226–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. & Macnaghten, P. (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation, Research Policy, 42, pp. 1568–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, G. (2003) Consumer driven and bi-directional value chain diffusion models, European Business Review, 15, pp. 390–400.
   Google Scholar
• Throne-Holst, H. & Rip, A. (2011) Complexities of labelling of nano-products on the consumer markets, European Journal of Law and Technology, 2, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Toivonen-Noro, M. I. & Kijima, K. (2018) The need for a new innovation paradigm and the contribution of service-dominant logic, in: S. L. Vargo, & R. F. Lusch (Eds) SAGE Handbook of Service-Dominant Logic, pp. 487–507 (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Toppinen, A., Sauru, M., Pätäri, S., Lähtinen, K. & Tuppura, A. (2019) Internal and external factors of competitiveness shaping the future of wooden multistory construction in Finland and Sweden, Construction Management and Economics, 37, pp. 201–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Kuilen, J. W. G., Ceccotti, A., Xia, Z. & He, M. (2011) Very tall wooden buildings with cross laminated timber, Procedia Engineering, 14, pp. 1621–1628.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Poel, I., Asveld, L., Flipse, S., Klaassen, P., Kwee, Z., Maia, M., Mantovani, E., Nathan, C., Porcari, A. & Yaghmaei, E. (2020) Learning to do responsible innovation in industry: Six lessons, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7, pp. 697–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernette, E. & Hamdi-Kidar, L. (2013) Co-creation with consumers: Who has the competence and wants to cooperate, International Journal of Market Research, 55, pp. 539–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihemäki, H., Toppinen, A. & Toivonen, R. (2020) Intermediaries to accelerate the diffusion of wooden multi-storey construction in Finland, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, pp. 433–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viholainen, N., Kylkilahti, E., Autio, M. & Toppinen, A. (2020) A home made of wood: Consumer experiences of wooden building materials, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44, pp. 542–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vischer, J. C. (2008) Towards a user-centred theory of the built environment, Building Research & Information, 36, pp. 231–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (1976) The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process, Research Policy, 5, pp. 212–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, R. (2013) A vision of responsible research and innovation, in: R. Owen, J. Bessant & M. Heintz (Eds) Responsible Innovation, pp. 51–74. (London: John Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A. (2014) After taste: Culture, consumption and theories of practice, Journal of Consumer Culture, 14, pp. 279–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwick, D., Bonsu, S. K. & Darmody, A. (2008) Putting consumers to work: Co-creation and new marketing govern-mentality, Journal of Consumer Culture, 8, pp. 163–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar