Atypical meningiomas: WHO moved the goalposts?

References

• Cushing H, Eisenhardt L. Meningiomas, their classification, regional behaviour, life history and surgical end results. Charles C. Thomas Springfield, Springfield 1938
   Google Scholar
• Histological typing of tumours of the central nervous system. World Health Organization International Histological Classification of Tumours, 2nd edn, P Kleihues, P C Burger, B W Scheithauer. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1993; 33–37
   Google Scholar
• Louis D N, Sheithauer B W, Budka H, von Deimling A, Kepes J J. Meningiomas. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the nervous system, WHO Classification of Tumours, P Kleihues, W K Cavenee. IARC Press, Geneva 2000
   Google Scholar
• Perry A, Scheithauer B W, Stafford S L, Lohse C M, Wollan P C. ‘Malignancy’ in meningiomas: a clinicopathological study of 116, with grading implications. Cancer 1999; 85: 2046–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modha A, Gutin P H. Diagnosis and treatment of atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: a review. Neurosurgery 2005; 57: 538–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford S L, Pollock B E, Foote R L, et al. Meningioma radiosurgery: tumour control, outcomes and complications among 190 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2001; 49: 1029–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson D. The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1957; 20: 22–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claus E B, Bondy M L, Schildkraut J M, et al. Epidemiology of intracranial meningioma. Neurosurgery 2005; 57: 1088–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis J, Smith C, Ironside J W, Erridge S, Whittle I R, Everington D. The accuracy of meningioma grading: a 10 year retrospective audit. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2005; 31: 141–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon M, Bostrom J, Koch P, Schramm J. Interinstitutional variance of post-operative radiotherapy and follow-up for meningiomas in Germany: impact of changes of the WHO classification. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 2006; 77: 767–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence/National Collaborating Centre for Cancer. Improving outcomes for people with brain and other CNS tumours. Online publication on NICE website, June, 2006
   Google Scholar
• Whittle I R, Smith C, Navoo P, Collie D. Meningiomas. Lancet 2004; 363(9420)1535–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bent M J, Stupp R, Brandes A A, Lacombe D. Current and future trials of the EORTC Brain Tumor Group. Onkologie 2004; 27(3)246–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malik I, Rowe J G, Walton L, Radatz M W, Kemeny A A. The use of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of meningiomas. Br J Neurosurg 2005; 19: 13–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz T S, Amdur R J, Yachnis A T, Mendenhall W M, Morris C G. Pushing the limits of radiotherapy for atypical and malignant meningiomas. Am J Clin Oncol 2005; 28: 70–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayerbe J, Lobato R D, de la Cruz J, et al. Risk factors predicting recurrence in patients operated on for intracranial meningioma. A multivariate analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999; 141: 921–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock B E, Stafford S L, Utter A, Giannini C, Schreiner S A. Stereotactic radiosurgery provides equivalent tumor control to Simpson Grade 1 resection for patients with small- to medium-size meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 55: 1000–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison M J, Wolfe D E, Lau T S, Mitnick R J, Sachdev V P. Radiation induced meningiomas: experience at the Mount Sinai Hospital and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: 564–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mefty O, Topsakal C, Pravdenkova S, Sawyer J R, Harrison M J. Radiation induced meningiomas: clinical, pathological, cytokinetic and cytogenetic characteristics. J Neurosurg 2004; 100: 1002–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang S, Law M, Zagzag D, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging measurements of endothelial permeability: differentiation between atypical and typical meningiomas. Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 1554–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura H, Takeuchi H, Koshimoto Y, et al. Perfusion imaging of meningioma by using continuous arterial spin-labelling: comparison with dynamic susceptibility weighted contrast-enhanced MR images and histopathologic features. Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 85–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar