Evaluation of the bony landmarks in transcondylar approach

References

• Al-Mefty O, Borba L A, Aoki N, Angtuaco E, Pait T G. The transcondylar approach to extradural non-neoplastic lesions of the craniovertebral junction. J Neurosur 1996; 84: 1–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ammirati M, Ma J, Cheatham M L, Mei Z T, Bloch J, Becker D P. The mandibular swing transcervical approach to the skull base: anatomical study. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1993; 78: 673–681
   Google Scholar
• Babu R P, Sekhar L N, Wright D C. Extreme lateral transcondylar approach: technical improvements and lessons learned. J Neurosurg 1994; 81: 49–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banerji D, Behari S, Jain V K, Pandey T, Chhabra D K. Extreme lateral transcondylar approach to the skull base. Neurology 1999; 47: 22–30, India
   Google Scholar
• Bertalanffy H, Seeger W. The dorsolateral, suboccipital, transcondylar approach to the lower clivus and anterior portion of the craniocervical junction. Neurosurgery 1991; 29: 815–821
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bozbuga M, Oztürk A, Bayraktar B, Arı A, Sahinoğlu K, Polat G, Gürel I. Surgical anatomy and morphometric analysis of the occipital condyles and foramen magnum. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 1998; 75: 329–334
   Google Scholar
• Canalis R F, Martin N, Black K, Ammirati M, Cheatham M, Bloch J, Becker D P. Lateral approach to tumours of the craniovertebral junction. Laryngoscope 1993; 103: 343–349
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crockard H A, Sen C N. Transoral approach for the management of the intradural lesions at the craniovertebral junction: review of 7 cases. Neurosurgery 1991; 28: 88–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day J D, Fukushima T, Giannotta S L. Cranial base approaches to posterior circulation aneursyms. J Neurosurg 1997; 87: 544–554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowd G C, Zeiller S, Awasthh D. Far lateral transcondylar approach: Dimensional anatomy. Neurosurgery 1999; 45: 95–100
   Google Scholar
• George B, Dematons C, Cophignon J. Lateral approach to the anterior portion of foramen magnum. Application to the surgical removal 14 benign tumours: technical note. Surg Neurol 1988; 29: 484–490
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• George B, Lot G. Anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the foramen magnum: Technical description and experience from 97 cases. Skull Base Surg 1995; 5: 9–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ginsberg L E. The posterior condylar canal. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15: 969–972
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammon W M, Kempe L G. The posterior fossa approach to aneurysms of the vertebral and basilar arteries. J Neurosurg 1972; 37: 339–347
   Google Scholar
• Heros RC Lateral suboccipital approach for vertebral and vertebrobasilar artery lesions. J Neurosurg 1986; 64: 559–562
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katsuta T, Matsushima T, Wen H T, Rhoton A L. Trajectory of the hypoglossal nerve in the hypoglossal canal: significance for the transcondylar approach. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2000; 40: 206–210
   Google Scholar
• Kratimenos G P, Crockard H A. The far lateral approach for ventrally placed foramen magnum and upper cervical spine tumours. Br J Neurosurg 1993; 7: 129–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsushima T, Matsukado K, Natori Y, Inamura T, Hitotsumatsu T, Fukui M. Surgery on a saccular vertebral artery-PICA aneursym via the transcondylar fossa (supracondylar transjugular tubercle) approach or the transcondylar approach: surgical results and indication for using two different lateral skull base approaches. J Neurosurg 2001; 95: 268–274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muthukumar N, Swaminathan R, Venkatesh G, Bhanumathy S P. A morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum region as it relates to the transcondylar approach. Acta Neruorchir 2005; 147: 889–895, (Wien)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nanda A, Vincent D A, Vannemreddy P SS, Baskaya M, Chanda A. Far-lateral approach to intradural lesions of the foramen magnum without resection of the occipital condyle. J Neurosurg 2002; 96: 302–309
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rhoton A L. The foramen magnum. Neurosurgery 2000; 47(Supp)155–193
   Google Scholar
• Rhoton A L. The far-lateral approach and its transcondylar, supracondylar, and paracondylar extensions. Neurosurgery 2000; 47(Supp)195–209
   Google Scholar
• Salas E, Sekhar L N, Ziyal I M, Caputy A J, Wright D C. Variations of the extreme-lateral craniocervical approach: anatomical study and clinical analysis of 69 patients. J Neurosurg 1999; 90(Supp)206–219
   Google Scholar
• Sanabria E AM, Ehara K, Tamaki N. Surgical experience with skull base approaches for foramen magnum meningioma. Neurol Med Chir 2002; 42: 472–480, (Tokyo)
   Google Scholar
• Sen C N, Sekhar L N. An extreme lateral approach to intradural lesions of the cervical spine and foramen magnum. Neurosurgery 1990; 27: 197–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sen C N, Sekhar L N. Surgical management of anteriorly placed lesions at the craniocervical junction—an alternative approach. Acta Neurochir 1991; 108: 70–77, (Wien)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spektor S, Anderson G J, McMenomey S O, Horgan M A, Kellog J X, Delshaw J B, Jr. Quantitative description of the far-lateral transcondylar transtubercular approach to the foramen magnum and clivus. J Neurosurg 2000; 92: 824–831
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tatagiba M, Koerbel A, Roser F. The midline suboccipital subtonsillar approach to the hypoglossal canal: surgical anatomy and clinical application. Acta Neurochir 2006; 148: 965–969, (Wien)
   Google Scholar
• Wen H T, Rhoton A L, Katsuta T, de Oliviera E. Microsurgical anatomy of the transcondylar, supracondylar and paracondylar extensions of the far lateral approach. J Neurosurg 1997; 87: 555–585
   PubMedGoogle Scholar