368
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Microsurgical posterior cervical foraminotomy: a study of 181 cases

, , , &
Pages 39-44 | Received 13 Mar 2015, Accepted 13 Jun 2016, Published online: 11 Jul 2016

References

  • Frykholm R. Cervical nerve root compression resulting from disc degeneration and root-sleeve fibrosis. Acta Chir Scand 1951;160:1–149.
  • Robinson RA, Smith GW. Anterolateral cervical disc removal and interbody fusion for cervical disc syndrome. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1955;96:233.
  • Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical discs. J Neurosurg 1958;15:602–17.
  • Epstein JA, Lavine LS, Aronson HA, Epstein BS. Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: the syndrome of foraminal constriction treated by foraminotomy and the removal of osteophytes. Clin Orthop 1965;40:113–22.
  • Robertson JT. Chapter 22. Anterior removal of cervical disc without fusion. Clin Neurosurg 1973;20:259–61.
  • Scoville WB, Dohrmann GJ, Corkill G. Late results of cervical disc surgery. J Neurosurg 1976;45:203–10.
  • Murphey F, Simmons JCH, Brunson B. Surgical treatment of laterally ruptured cervical disc. Review of 648 cases, 1939 to 1972. J Neurosurg 1977;38:679–83.
  • Henderson CM, Hennessy RG, Shuey HM Jr., Shackelford EG. Posterior-lateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 consecutively operated cases. Neurosurgery 1983;13:504–12.
  • Ducker TB, Zeidman SM. The posterior operative approach for cervical radiculopathy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1993;4:61–74.
  • Onimus M, Destrumelle N, Gangloff S. Surgical treatment of cervical disk displacement. Anterior or posterior approach? Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1995;81:296–301.
  • Jho HD. Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy for radiculopathy: a new approach to cervical disc herniation. J Neurosurg 1996;84:155–60.
  • Saringer W, Nobauer I, Reddy M, et al. Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy (uncoforaminotomy) for unilateral radiculopathy: clinical results of a new technique. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002;144:685–94.
  • Cornelius JF, Bruneau M, George B. Microsurgical cervical nerve root decompression via an anterolateral approach: clinical outcome of patients treated for spondylotic radiculopathy. Neurosurgery 2007;61:972–80.
  • Caglar YS, Bozkurt M, Kahilogullari G, et al. Keyhole approach for posterior cervical discectomy: experience on 84 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2007;50:7–11.
  • Gala VC, O’Toole JE, Voyadzis JM, Fessler RG. Posterior minimally invasive approaches for the cervical spine. Orthop Clin North Am 2007;38:339–49.
  • Odom GL, Finney W, Woodhall B. Cervical disk lesions. J Am Med Assoc 1958;166:23–8.
  • Caridi JM, Pumberger M, Hughes AP. Cervical Radiculopathy: a review. HSS J 2011;7:265–72.
  • Chen BH, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GB. Comparison of biomechanical response to surgical procedures used for cervical radiculopathy: posterior keyhole foraminotomy versus anterior foraminotomy and discectomy versus anterior discectomy with fusion. J Spinal Disord 2001;14:17–20.
  • Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT, Overholt DP. Surgical management of cervical soft disc herniation. A comparison between the anterior and posterior approach. Spine 1990;15:1026–30.
  • Korinth MC, Kruger A, Oertel MF, Gilsbach JM. Posterior foraminotomy or anterior discectomy with polymethyl methacrylate interbody stabilization for cervical soft disc disease: results in 292 patients with monoradiculopathy. Spine 2006;31:1207–14.
  • Krupp W, Schattke H, Muke R. Clinical results of the foraminotomy as described by Frykholm for the treatment of lateral cervical disc herniation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1990;107:22–9.
  • Grieve JP, Kitchen ND, Moore AJ, Marsh HT. Results of posterior cervical foraminotomy for treatment of cervical spondylitic radiculopathy. Br J Neurosurg 2000;14:40–3.
  • Ziewacz JE, Wu JC, Mummaneni PV. Microendoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy: are we there yet? World Neurosurg 2013;81:290–1.
  • Nakagawa H. Surgical strategies in the management of cervical degenerative disorders. World Neurosurg 2013;79:294–5.
  • Witzmann A, Hejazi N, Krasznai L. Posterior cervical foraminotomy. A follow-up study of 67 surgically treated patients with compressive radiculopathy. Neurosurg Rev 2000;23:213–7.
  • Zdeblick TA, Zou D, Warden KE, et al. Cervical stability after foraminotomy. A biomechanical in vitro analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:22–7.
  • Jagannathan J, Sherman JH, Szabo T, et al. The posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical disc/osteophyte disease: a single-surgeon experience with a minimum of 5 years clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;10:347–56.
  • Zeidman SM, Ducker TB. Posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy for radiculopathy: review of 172 cases. Neurosurgery 1993;33:356–62.
  • Steinberg JA, German JW. The effect of minimally invasive posterior cervical approaches versus open anterior approaches on neck pain and disability. Int J Spine Surg 2012;6:55–61.
  • Kim KT, Kim YB. Comparison between open procedure and tubular retractor assisted procedure for cervical radiculopathy: results of a randomized controlled study. J Korean Med Sci 2009;24:649–53.
  • Clark JG, Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP, et al. Minimally invasive versus open cervical foraminotomy: a systematic review. Global Spine J 2011;1:9–14.
  • Heary RF, Ryken TC, Matz PG, et al. Cervical laminoforaminotomy for the treatment of cervical degenerative radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;11:198–202.
  • Kumar GR, Maurice-Williams RS, Bradford R. Cervical foraminotomy: an effective treatment for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Br J Neurosurg 1998;12:563–8.
  • Davis RA. A long-term outcome study of 170 surgically treated patients with compressive cervical radiculopathy. Surg Neurol 1996;46:523–30.
  • Wang TY, Lubelski D, Abdullah KG, et al. Rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion after initial posterior cervical foraminotomy. Spine J 2013;15:971–6.
  • Bydon M, Mathios D, Macki M, et al. Long-term patient outcomes after posterior cervical foraminotomy: an analysis of 151 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;21:727–31.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.