References
- Fulkerson DH, Horner TG, Payner TD, et al. Results, outcomes, and follow-up of remnants in the treatment of ophthalmic aneurysms: a 16-year experience of a combined neurosurgical and endovascular team. Neurosurgery 2009;64:218–29.
- Bouthillier A, van Loveren HR, Keller JT. Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 1996;38:425–32.
- Hoh BL, Carter BS, Budzik RF, et al. Results after surgical and endovascular treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms by a combined neurovascular team. Neurosurgery 2001;48:78–89. discussion 89–90.
- Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2002;360:1267–74.
- Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Yu L-M, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet Lond Engl 2005;366:809–17.
- Molyneux AJ, Birks J, Clarke A, et al. The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet Lond Engl. 2015;385:691–7.
- Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:e1–34.
- Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008–12.
- Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet Lond Engl. 1975;1:480–4.
- Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta- analyses. [cited 2016 May 28]. 1999. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/nosgen.pdf
- Orlický M, Sameš M, Hejčl A, Vachata P. Carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms-Our results and treatment strategy. Br J Neurosurg 2015;29:237–42.
- Boet R, Wong GKC, Poon WS, et al. Aneurysm recurrence after treatment of paraclinoid/ophthalmic segment aneurysms: a treatment-modality assessment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005;147:611–6.
- Sherif C, Gruber A, Dorfer C, et al. Ruptured carotid artery aneurysms of the ophthalmic (C6) segment: clinical and angiographic long term follow-up of a multidisciplinary management strategy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:1261–7.
- Zhu Y, Pan J, Shen J, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes after treatment of unruptured paraophthalmic internal carotid artery aneurysms: a comparative and pooled analysis of single-center experiences. World Neurosurg 2015;84:1726–38.
- Bendel P, Koivisto T, Hänninen T, et al. Subarachnoid hemorrhage is followed by temporomesial volume loss: MRI volumetric study. Neurology 2006;67:575–82.
- Bendel P, Koivisto T, Niskanen E, et al. Brain atrophy and neuropsychological outcome after treatment of ruptured anterior cerebral artery aneurysms: a voxel-based morphometric study. Neuroradiology 2009;51:711–22.