Survival analysis of the Wallis interspinous spacer used as an augment to lumbar decompression

References

• Lurie J, Tomkins-Lane C. Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. BMJ 2016;352:h6234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 1992;17:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008;358:794–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, Bronner KK, Fisher ES. United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine 2006;31:2707–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucherman J, Hsu K, Hartjen C, et al. A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results. Eur Spine J 2004;13:22–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sénégas J, Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system. In: Gunzburg R, Mayer HM, Szpalski M, Aebi M, eds. Arthroplasty of the spine. Berlin (Germany): Springer; 2004:108–113.
   Google Scholar
• Boeree N. Clinical outcomes of patients with the Wallis system: two year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 2006;88-B (Suppl III):458.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesan M, Udwadia A, Ahmed A, Doyle J. Preliminary results of non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: Wallis system. J Bone Joint Surg 2009;91-B (Suppl II):284.
   Google Scholar
• Carey R. Wallis stabilisation study. J Bone Joint Surg 2005;87-B (Suppl III):408.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy RKJ, McEvoy L, Ali Z, Bolger C, Young S. Prospective evaluation of the 'Wallis' lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization system. J Bone Joint Surg 2012;94(Suppl X):141.
   Google Scholar
• Sénégas J, Vital J, Pointillart V, Mangione P. Long-term actuarial survivorship analysis of an interspinous stabilization system. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1279–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guha A, Mukhopadhyay S, Ahuja S. Use of Wallis in low back pain due to degenerative disc disease: Cardiff experience. J Bone Joint Surg 2012;94-B (Suppl X):95.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson KE, Lindsey DP, Hsu KY, Zucherman JF, Yerby SA. The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures. Spine 2003;28:26–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobottke R, Schluter-Brust K, Kaulhausen T, et al. Interspinous implants (X Stop®, Wallis®, Diam®) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome? Eur Spine J 2009; 18:1494–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerosch J, Moursi MG. Foreign body reaction due to polyethylene's wear after implantation of an interspinal segment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008;128:1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamburrelli FC, Proietti L, Logroscino CA. Critical analysis of lumbar interspinous devices failures: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J 2011;20:27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korovessis P, Repantis T, Zacharatos S, Zafiropoulos A. Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion? Eur Spine J 2009;18:830–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson K, Németh G, Granath F, Blomqvist P. Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years: a national analysis of 9,664 operations. Eur Spine J 2005;14:659–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson A, et al. Long-term outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis: eight-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine 2015;40:63–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards JC, Majumdar S, Lindsey DP, Beaupre GS, Yerby SA. The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication. Spine 2005;30:744–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson JNA, Relevant neuroanatomy of the lumbar motion segment. In: Lewandrowksi KU, Iprenburg M, Lee SH, eds. Endoscopic Spinal Surgery. London (UK): JP Medical; 2012:13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Van Roy P, Barbaix E, Clarijs JP, Anatomy of the lumbar canal, foramen and ligaments with references to recent insights. In: Gunzburg R, Szpalski M, eds. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000:7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson PA, Tribus CB, Kitchel SH. Treatement of neurogenic claudication by interspinous decompression: application of the X STOP device in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2006;4:463–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzeri R, Galarza M, Alfieri A. Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases: past, present, and future. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:975052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer F, Yagdiran A, Neu P, Kaulhausen T, Eysel P, Sobottke R. Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life. Eur Spine J 2013;22:2015–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VV, Whang PG, Haley TR, et al. Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2015;40:275–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu A-M, Zhou Y, Li Q-L, et al. Interspinous spacer versus traditional decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e97142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromqvist BH, Berg S, Gerdhem P, et al. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine 2013;38:1436–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moojen WA, Arts MP, Jacobs WC, et al. Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2013;347:f6415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter A, Halm HF, Hauck M, Quante M. 20year follow-up after decompressive surgery with and without implantation of an interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective controlled study. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012;27:336–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kim KA, McDonald M, Pik JH, Khoueir P, Wang MY. Dynamic intraspinous spacer technology for posterior stabilization: case-control study on the safety, sagittal angulation and pain outcome at 1-year follow-up evaluation. Neurosurg Focus 2007;22:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hong P, Liu Y, Li H. Comparison of the efficacy and safety between interspinous process distraction device and open decompression surgery in treating lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta analysis. J Invest Surg 2015;28:40–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roder C, Baumgarter B, Berlemann U, Aghayev E. Superior outcomes of decompression with an interlaminar dynamic device versus decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and back pain: a cross registry study. Eur Spine J 2015;24:2228–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sénégas J, Vital J, Pointillart V, Mangione P. Clinical evaluation of a lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device (the Wallis system) with a 13-year mean follow-up. Neurosurg Rev 2009;32:335–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh GDJ, Mahir S, Leyte A. A prospective randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of dynamic stabilisation of the lumbar spine with the Wallis ligament. Eur Spine J 2014;23:2156–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar