Outcome study of the pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms at a single UK institution

References

• Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Yu L-M, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, et al. Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke J Cereb Circ 2007;38:1538–44.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorella D, Kelly ME, Turner R, Lylyk P. Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms: current devices, emerging therapies and future technology for the management of cerebral aneurysms. Endovasc Today 2008;7:53–65.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Fiorella D. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrese I, Sarabia R, Pintado R, Delgado-Rodriguez M. Flow-diverter devices for intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2013;73:193–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briganti F, Napoli M, Tortora F, et al. Italian multicenter experience with flow-diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complications: a retrospective data analysis. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1145–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu SC-H, Kwok C-K, Cheng P-W, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of pipeline embolization device: a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan TT, Chan KY, Pang PK, Kwok JC. Pipeline embolisation device for wide-necked internal carotid artery aneurysms in a hospital in Hong Kong: preliminary experience. Hong Kong Med J 2011;17:398–404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cirillo L, Dall’Olio M, Princiotta C, et al. The use of flow-diverting stents in the treatment of giant cerebral aneurysms: preliminary results. Neuroradiol J 2010;23:220–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siddiqui AH, Kan P, Abla AA, Hopkins LN, Levy EI. Complications after treatment with pipeline embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or without coil embolization. Neurosurgery 2012;71:E509–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond J, Darsaut TE, Guilbert F, Weill A, Roy D. Flow diversion in aneurysms trial: the design of the FIAT study. Interv Neuroradiol 2011;17:147–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comin J, Kallmes DF. Platelet-function testing in patients undergoing neurovascular procedures: caught between a rock and a hard place. Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:730–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Siddiqui AH, Hanel RA, Kallmes DF. Platelet testing is associated with worse clinical outcomes for patients treated with the pipeline embolization device. Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2090–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siller-Matula JM, Trenk D, Schrör K, et al. Response variability to P2Y12 receptor inhibitors expectations and reality. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:1111–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D, et al. International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro M, Becske T, Riina HA, et al. Toward an endovascular internal carotid artery classification system. Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:230–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, et al. Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42; discussion 642–3; quiz N6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe W, Wycoco V, Rice H, Phatouros C, Singh TJ, Wenderoth J. Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:164–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piano M, Valvassori L, Quilici L, Pero G, Boccardi E. Midterm and long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter devices: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg 2012;118:408–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szikora I, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne JV, Beltechi R, Yarnold JA, Birks J, Kamran M. Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 2010;5:e12492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saatci I, Yavuz K, Ozer C, Geyik S, Cekirge HS. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer S, Vajda Z, Aguilar Perez M, et al. Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012;54:369–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson PK, Sahlein D, Shapiro M, et al. Recent steps toward a reconstructive endovascular solution for the orphaned, complex-neck aneurysm. Neurosurgery 2006;59:S3–77.
   Google Scholar
• Kallmes DF, Ding YH, Dai D, Kadirvel R, Lewis DA, Cloft HJ. A second-generation, endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1153–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im S-H, Han MH, Kwon O-K, et al. Endovascular coil embolization of 435 small asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms: procedural morbidity and patient outcome. Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:79–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro M. Neurovascular topics in the endovascular arena. SAM-vascular-audience response (AR) Self assessment module (SAM). In: Mitchell P, ed. Book of abstracts. Vol. 16A. Long Beach (CA): American Society of Neuroradiology; 2017:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada N, Hayashi K, Murao K, Higashi M, Iihara K. Time-of-flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1154–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Amerongen MJ, Boogaarts HD, de Vries J, et al. MRA versus DSA for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1655–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levent A, Yuce I, Eren S, Ozyigit O, Kantarci M. Contrast-enhanced and time-of-flight MR angiographic assessment of endovascular coiled intracranial aneurysms at 1.5 T. Interv Neuroradiol 2014;20:686–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall A, Kugel H, Bachman R, et al. 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography: in vitro comparison of intravascular stent artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:772–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Truong TN, Yen C, et al. Quantitative evaluation of susceptibility and shielding effects of nitinol, platinum, cobalt-alloy, and stainless steel stents. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:972–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum MB, Schmook M, Schernthaner R, et al. Quantification and detectability of in-stent stenosis with CT angiography and MR angiography in arterial stents in vitro. Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:1238–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lettau M, Sauer A, Heiland S, Rohde S, Bendszus M. Hähnel S. Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 T and 3T. Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1993–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddu SR, Tong FC, Dehkharghani S, Dion JE, Saindane AM. Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2112–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater L-A, Soufan C, Holt M, Chong W. Effect of flow diversion with silk on aneurysm size: a single center experience. Interv Neuroradiol 2015;21:12–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attali J, Benaissa A, Soize S, Kadziolka K, Portefaix C, Pierot L. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow diverter: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography (3D-TOF-MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) sequences with digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard. J NeuroIntervent Surg 2016;8:81–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Deshmukh VR, et al. Endovascular reconstruction with the neuroform stent as monotherapy for the treatment of uncoilable intradural pseudoaneurysms. Neurosurgery 2006;59:291–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA Executive Summary. Meeting to discuss clinical study design and evaluation of clinical study data for the treatment of aneurysm, 2015. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/NeurologicalDevicesPanel/UCM442242.pdf [last accessed 14 May 2017].
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Medical technologies guidance [MTG10], 2012. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg10/chapter/4-NHS-considerations [last accessed 14 May 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Briganti F, Delehaye L, Leone G, et al. Flow diverter device for the treatment of small middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J NeuroIntervent Surg 2016;8:287–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulcsár Z, Houdart E, Bonafé A, et al. Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubicz B, Collignon L, Raphaeli G, et al. Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke J Cereb Circ 2010;41:2247–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang G, Kim JG, Song KS, et al. Delayed ischemic stroke after stent-assisted coil placement in cerebral aneurysm: characteristics and optimal duration of preventative dual antiplatelet therapy. Radiology 2014;273:194–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withers K, Carolan-Rees G, Dale M. Pipeline™ embolization device for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms. a NICE medical technology guidance. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2013;11:5–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar