Evaluation of obliteration of arteriovenous malformations after stereotactic radiosurgery with arterial spin labeling MR imaging

References

• Steiner L, Leksell L, Greitz T, Forste DM, Backlund EO. Stereotaxic radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Report of a case. Acta Chir Scand 1972;138:459–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations of the brain. J Neurosurg 1991;75:512–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner L, Lindquist C, Adler JR, Torner JC, Alves W, Steiner M. Clinical outcome of radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1992;77:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruyama K, Kawahara N, Shin M, et al. The risk of hemorrhage after radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. N Engl J Med 2005;352:146–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kano H, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations, part 1: management of Spetzler-Martin grade I and II arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 2012;116:11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koltz MT, Polifka AJ, Saltos A, et al. Long-term outcome of gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations graded by the Spetzler-Martin classification. J Neurosurg 2013;118:74–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock BE, Link MJ, Stafford SL, Garces YI, Foote RL. Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: the effect of treatment period on patient outcomes. Neurosurgery 2016;78:499–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starke RM, Kano H, Ding D, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation of long-term outcomes in a multicenter cohort. J Neurosurg 2016;126:36–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fokas E, Henzel M, Wittig A, Grund S, Engenhart-Cabillic R. Stereotactic radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: long-term follow-up in 164 patients of a single institution. J Neurol 2013;116:2156–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuo T, Kamada K, Izumo T, Hayashi N, Nagata I. Linear accelerator-based radiosurgery alone for arteriovenous malformation: more than 12 years of observation. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 2014;89:576–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai Y, Handa Y, Ishii H, et al. Endovascular therapy followed by stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Interv Neuroradiol 2006;12(Suppl 1):163–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo WY, Wu YT, Wu HM, et al. Toward normal perfusion after radiosurgery: perfusion MR imaging with independent component analysis of brain arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1636–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaraja S, Lee KJ, Coley SC, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: quantitative MR assessment of nidal response at 1 year and angiographic factors predicting early obliteration. Neuroradiology 2006;48:821–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wowra B, Muacevic A, Tonn JC, Schoenberg SO, Reiser M, Herrmann KA. Obliteration dynamics in cerebral arteriovenous malformations after CyberKnife radiosurgery: quantification with sequential nidus volumetry and 3-tesla 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Neurosurgery 2009;64:A102–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khandanpour N, Griffiths P, Warren D, Hoggard N. Prospective comparison of late 3T MRI with conventional angiography in evaluating the patency of cerebral arteriovenous malformationstreated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Neuroradiology 2013;55:683–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor TE, Friedman WA. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cerebral arteriovenous malformation obliteration after stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 2013;73:761–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CC, Reardon MA, Ball BZ, et al. The predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating intracranial arteriovenous malformation obliteration after stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 2015;123:136–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsop DC, Detre JA. Multisection cerebral blood flow MR imaging with continuous arterial spin labeling. Radiology 1998;208:410–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura H, Kado H, Koshimoto Y, Tsuchida T, Yonekura Y, Itoh H. Multislice continuous arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI in patients with chronic occlusive cerebrovascular disease: a corrective study with CO2 PET validation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:189–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detre JA, Alsop DC, Vives LR, Maccotta L, Teener JW, Raps EC. Noninvasive MRI evaluation of cerebral blood flow in cerebrovascular disease. Neurology 1998;50:633–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalela JA, Alsop DC, Gonzalez-Atavales JB, Maldjian JA, Kasner SE, Detre JA. Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke using continuous arterial spin labeling. Stroke 2000;31:680–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura H, Takeuchi H, Koshimoto Y, et al. Perfusion imaging of meningioma by using continuous arterial spin-labeling: comparison with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images and histopathologic features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:85–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto T, Kinoshita K, Kosaka N, et al. Monitoring of extra-axial brain tumor response to radiotherapy using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling images: preliminary results. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2013;31:1271–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto T, Takeuchi H, Kinoshita K, Kosaka N, Kimura H. Assessment of tumor blood flow and its correlation with histopathologic features in skull base meningiomas and schwannomas by using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling images. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:817–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf RL, Wang J, Detre JA, Zager EL, Hurst RW. Arteriovenous shunt visualization in arteriovenous malformations with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:681–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukuk GM, Hadizadeh DR, Boström A, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations at 3.0 T: intraindivisual comparative study of 4D-MRA in combination with selective arterial spin labeling and digital subtraction angiography. Invest Radiol 2010;45:126–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdemann L, Jedrzejewski G, Heidenreich J, Han ET, Bruhn H. Perfusion imaging of cerebral cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a study comparing quantitative continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging 2011;29:1157–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le TT, Fischbein NJ, André JB, Wijman C, Rosenberg J, Zaharchuk G. Identification of venous signal on arterial spin labeling improves diagnosis of dural arteriovenous fistulas and small arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:61–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabavizadeh SA, Edgar JC, Vossough A. Utility of susceptibility-weighted imaging and arterial spin perfusion imaging in pediatric brain arteriovenous shunting. Neuroradiology 2014;56:877–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock JM, Whitlow CT, Simonds J, et al. Response of arteriovenous malformations to gamma knife therapy evaluated with pulsed arterial spin-labeled MRI perfusion. Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amponsah K, Ellis TL, Chan MD, et al. Retrospective analysis of imaging techniques for treatment planning and monitoring of obliteration for gamma knife treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Neurosurgery 2012;71:893–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauwblomme T, Naggara O, Brunelle F, et al. Arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging: toward noninvasive diagnosis and follow-up of pediatric brain arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2015;15:451–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunwoo L, Sohn CH, Lee JY, et al. Evaluation of the degree of arteriovenous shunting in intracranial arteriovenous malformations using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroradiology 2015;57:775–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Zhang Y, Wolf RL, Roc AC, Alsop DC, Detre JA. Amplitude-modulated continuous arterial spin-labeling 3.0-T perfusion MR imaging with a single coil: feasibility study. Radiology 2005;235:218–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X, et al. Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:102–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara Y, Kimura H, Miyati T, et al. MR perfusion imaging by alternate slab width inversion recovery arterial spin labeling (AIRASL): a technique with higher signal-to-noise ratio at 3.0 T. Magn Reson Mater Phy 2012;25:103–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu K, Kosaka N, Yamamoto T, et al. Arterial spin labeling perfusion-weighted MRI for long-term follow-up of a cerebral arteriovenous malformation after stereotactic radiosurgery. Acta Radiol Short Rep 2014;3:1–4.
   Google Scholar