Comparing the postoperative results of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, cervical disc prosthesis and minimal invasive posterior cervical disc surgery

References

• Foster MT, Carleton-Bland NP, Lee MK, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes in anterior cervical discectomy versus foraminotomy for brachialgia. Br J Neurosurg 2018;19:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Heary RF, Ryken TC, Matz PG, et al. Cervical laminoforaminotomy for the treatment of cervical degenerative radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;11:198–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1999;81:519–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanda A, Sharma M, Sonig A, et al. Surgical complications of anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion for cervical degenerative disk disease: a single surgeon’s experience of 1576 patients. World Neurosurg 2014;82:1380–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobrial GM, Levi AD. Posterior cervical foraminotomy. In Tender G, editor. Minimally invasive spine surgery techniques. Cham: Springer; 2018:203–211.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips FM, Garfin SR. Cervical disc replacement. Spine 2005;30:S27–S33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faught RW, Church EW, Halpern CH, et al. Long-term quality of life after posterior cervical foraminotomy for radiculopathy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016;142:22–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagannathan J, Sherman JH, Szabo T, et al. The posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical disc/osteophyte disease: a single-surgeon experience with a minimum of 5 years’ clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;10:347–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavelle WF, Riew KD, Levi AD, et al. 2019. Ten-year outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the BRYAN Cervical Disc: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Spine 2019;44:601–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo BC, Massel DH, Bohl DD, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the surgical learning curve. Spine 2016;41:1580–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leven D, Meaike J, Radcliff K, et al. Cervical disc replacement surgery: indications, technique, and technical pearls. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2017;10:160–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahai N, Changoor S, Dunn CJ, et al. Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy as an alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for unilateral cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine 2019;44:1731–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hisey MS, Zigler JE, Jackson R, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of one-level Mobi-C cervical total disc replacement vs. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results at 5-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg 2016;10:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu WJ, Hu L, Chou PH, et al. Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. Orthop Surg 2016;8:425–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutman G, Rosenzweig DH, Golan JD. Surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2018;43:E365–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok JK, Sheha ED, Samuel AM, et al. Evaluation of current trends in treatment of single-level cervical radiculopathy. Clin Spine Surg 2019;32:241–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin GX, Rui G, Sharma S, et al. Does the neck pain, function, or range of motion differ after anterior cervical fusion, cervical disc replacement, and posterior cervical foraminotomy? World Neurosurg 2019;129:485–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991;14:409–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn C, Moore J, Sahai N, et al. Minimally invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy (mis-PCF) with tubes prevents undesired fusion with long term follow-up. Spine J 2018;18:S19.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg JA, German JW. The effect of minimally invasive posterior cervical approaches versus open anterior approaches on neck pain and disability. Int J Spine Surg 2012;6:55–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu H, Peng L. Efficacy and safety of Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis. Medicine 2017;96:e8504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RJ, Davis RJ, Hoffman GA, et al. Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C cervical disc prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2016;24:734–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumagai G, Wada K, Kudo H, et al. Associations between cervical disc degeneration and muscle strength in a cross-sectional population-based study. PLoS One 2019;14:e0210802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KT, Cho DC, Sung JK, et al. Comparative analysis between total disc replacement and posterior foraminotomy for posterolateral soft disc herniation with unilateral radiculopathy: clinical and biomechanical results of a minimum 5 years follow-up. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2017;60:30–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peto I, Scheiwe C, Kogias E, et al. Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy: freiburg experience with 34 patients. Clin Spine Surg 2017;30:E1419–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar