An optimal cortical bone trajectory technique to prevent early surgical complications

References

• Matsukawa K, Taguchi E, Yato Y, et al. Evaluation of the fixation strength of pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal trajectory for optimal fixation? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:E873–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Spengler D, Brick C, Reid S. Spinal pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram-based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988;13:1012–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller JG, Silcox DH 3rd, Sutterlin CE 3rd. Complications of posterior cervical plating. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:2442–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davne SH, Myers DL. Complications of lumbar spinal fusion with transpedicular instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:S184–S9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenberg RH, Shea M, Swartz DE, Lee KS, White AA 3rd, Hayes WC. Importance of bone mineral density in instrumented spine fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991;16:647–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuyama K, Sato K, Abe E, Inaba H, Shimada Y, Murai H. Stability of transpedicle screwing for the osteoporotic spine. An in vitro study of the mechanical stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:2240–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, et al. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J 2009;9:366–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Tencer AF, Anderson PA. Caudo-cephalad loading of pedicle screws: mechanisms of loosening and methods of augmentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:2438–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Orribo L, Kalb S, Reyes PM, Chang SW, Crawford NR. Biomechanics of lumbar cortical screw-rod fixation versus pedicle screw-rod fixation with and without interbody support. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:635–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Nemoto O, Imabayashi H, Asazuma T, Nemoto K. Morphometric measurement of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screw insertion using computed tomography. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013;26:E248–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mobbs RJ. The “medio-latero-superior trajectory technique”: an alternative cortical trajectory for pedicle fixation. Orthop Surg 2013;5:56–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorson TL, Kelley LA, Thomas KA, Whitecloud TS, 3rd, Cook SD. Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:2415–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Kato T, Imabayashi H, Asazuma T, Nemoto K. In vivo analysis of insertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bone trajectory technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:E240–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers BS, Belmont PJ, Jr,., Richardson WJ, Yu JR, Harper KD, Nightingale RW. The role of imaging and in situ biomechanical testing in assessing pedicle screw pull-out strength. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:1962–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdeblick TA, Kunz DN, Cooke ME, McCabe R. Pedicle screw pullout strength. Correlation with insertional torque. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:1673–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Jiang B, Fu Z, Zhang D, Wang T. Accurate determination of isthmus of lumbar pedicle: a morphometric study using reformatted computed tomographic images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:2438–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov AA, Faizan A, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting R, Goel VK. The effect of removing the lateral part of the pars interarticularis on stress distribution at the neural arch in lumbar foraminal microdecompression at L3-L4 and L4-L5: anatomic and finite element investigations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:2462–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glennie RA, Dea N, Kwon BK, Street JT. Early clinical results with cortically based pedicle screw trajectory for fusion of the degenerative lumbar spine. J Clin Neurosci 2015;22:972–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsukawa K, Kaito T, Abe Y. Accuracy of cortical bone trajectory screw placement using patient-specific template guide system. Neurosurg Rev 2020;43:1135–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado-Fernández J, Pulido Rivas P, Gil-Simoes R, de Sola RG. How I do it? Lumbar cortical bone trajectory fixation with image-guided neuronavigation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2019;161:2423–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le X, Tian W, Shi Z, et al. Robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted cortical bone trajectory screw instrumentation in lumbar spinal surgery: a matched-cohort comparison. World Neurosurg 2018;120:e745–e51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Lee JH, Park JW, Shin YH. The insertional torque of a pedicle screw has a positive correlation with bone mineral density in posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94:93–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soshi S, Shiba R, Kondo H, Murota K. An experimental study on transpedicular screw fixation in relation to osteoporosis of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991;16:1335–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akpolat YT, Inceoglu S, Kinne N, Hunt D, Cheng WK. Fatigue performance of cortical bone trajectory screw compared with standard trajectory pedicle screw. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016;41:E355–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link TM, Koppers BB, Licht T, Bauer J, Lu Y, Rummeny EJ. In vitro and in vivo spiral CT to determine bone mineral density: initial experience in patients at risk for osteoporosis. Radiology 2004;231:805–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Chung CK, Oh SH, Park SB. Correlation between bone mineral density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and hounsfield units measured by diagnostic CT in lumbar spine. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2013;54:384–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber JJ, Anderson PA, Hsu WK. Use of computed tomography for assessing bone mineral density. Neurosurg Focus 2014;37:E4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu W, Gluer CC, Grampp S, et al. Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: a comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporos Int 1995;5:433–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar