The discrepant clinical outcome predictions according to the differentiated centre of rotation shift after multilevel cervical total disc replacement

References

• Wu AM, Xu H, Mullinix KP, et al. Minimum 4-year outcomes of cervical total disc arthroplasty versus fusion: a meta-analysis based on prospective randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e665.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daentzer D, Welke B, Hurschler C, et al. In vitro-analysis of kinematics and intradiscal pressures in cervical arthroplasty versus fusion-A biomechanical study in a sheep model with two semi-constrained prosthesis. Biomed Eng Online 2015;14:27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng CW, Yue WM, Basit A, et al. Intermediate results of the prestige LP cervical disc replacement: clinical and radiological analysis with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:E105–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey PK, Pawar I, Gupta J, Verma RR. Comparison of outcomes of single level anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and single level artificial cervical disc replacement for single level cervical degenrative disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42:E41–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F, Yang J, Ni B, Guo Q, Lu X, Xie N. Clinical and radiological follow-up of single-level Prestige LP cervical disc replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013;133:473–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, Yone K, Sakou T, Nakanishi K. Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:670–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Espina CG, Amirouche F, Havalad V. Multilevel cervical fusion and its effect on disc degeneration and osteophyte formation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:972–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou J, Li H, Rong X, Wu W, Liu H. Location change of center of rotation after single-level cervical total disc replacement with ProDisc-C. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2016;50:339–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo Z, Zhao Y, Du C, Sun Y, Zhang M, Fan Y. Does location of rotation center in artificial disc affect cervical biomechanics? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:E469–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rong X, Gong Q, Liu H, et al. The effect of deviated center of rotation on flexion-extension range of motion after single-level cervical arthroplasty: an in vivo study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:B12–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SW, Paik SH, Oh JK, Kwak YH, Lee HW, You KH. The impact of coronal alignment of device on radiographic degeneration in the case of total disc replacement. Spine J 2016;16:470–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchikanti L, Singh V, Cash KA, Pampati V, Datta S. A comparative effectiveness evaluation of percutaneous adhesiolysis and epidural steroid injections in managing lumbar post surgery syndrome: a randomized, equivalence controlled trial. Pain Physician 2009;12:E355–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Liu Z, VanHoof T, Kalala J, Zeng Z, Lin X. Kinematic study of the relation between the instantaneous center of rotation and degenerative changes in the cervical intervertebral disc. Eur Spine J 2014;23:2307–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amevo B, Aprill C, Bogduk N. Abnormal instantaneous axes of rotation in patients with neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:748–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CS, Lee DH, Hwang CJ, Kim H, Noh H. The effect of a mismatched center of rotation on the clinical outcomes and flexion-extension range of motion: lumbar total disk replacement using mobidisc at a 5.5-year follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014;27:148–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rousseau MA, Bonnet X, Skalli W. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:E10–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk I, Lazaro BC, Fink M, Rabin D, Duggal N. Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc. SPI 2011;15:630–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbusera F, Anasetti F, Bellini CM, Costa F, Fornari M. The influence of the axial, antero-posterior and lateral positions of the center of rotation of a ball-and-socket disc prosthesis on the cervical spine biomechanics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010;25:397–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colle KO, Butler JB, Reyes PM, Newcomb AG, Theodore N, Crawford NR. Biomechanical evaluation of a metal-on-metal cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis. Spine J 2013;13:1640–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly BP, Zufelt NA, Sander EJ, DiAngelo DJ. The influence of fixed sagittal plane centers of rotation on motion segment mechanics and range of motion in the cervical spine. J Biomech 2013;46:1369–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar