Review and analysis of modern lumbar spinal fusion techniques

References

• Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, et al. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine 2012;37:67–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logroscino CA, Proietti L, Pola E, et al. A minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine instabilities. Eur Spine J 2011;20: S41–S5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, et al. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 2015;1:2–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pradhan BB, Nassar JA, Delamarter RB, et al. Single-level lumbar spine fusion: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002;15:355–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 7: intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;2:670–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey C, Deviren V, Xu Z, et al. The effects of rod contouring on spinal construct fatigue strength. Spine 2006;31:1680–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaraja S, Palepu V. Integrated fixation cage loosening under fatigue loading. Int J Spine Surg 2017;11:20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk M, Smit TH, Sugihara S, et al. The effect of cage stiffness on the rate of lumbar interbody fusion: an in vivo model using poly(l-lactic Acid) and titanium cages. Spine 2002;27:682–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz G, Borkhuu B, Dhawale AA, et al. Comparative analysis of hook, hybrid, and pedicle screw instrumentation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2012;32:490–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albee FH. Transplantation of a portion of the tibia into the spine for Pott’s disease: a preliminary report 1911. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;460:14–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurz LT, Garfin SR, Booth RE. Jr., Harvesting autogenous iliac bone grafts. A review of complications and techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14:1324–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell RC, Mobbs RJ, Lu VM, et al. Posterolateral fusion versus interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J 2017;7:482–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan K, Thayaparan GK, Mobbs RJ. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Neurosurg 2015;29:705–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lestini WF, Fulghum JS, Whitehurst LA. Lumbar spinal fusion: advantages of posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Technol Int 1994;3:577–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiltfong RE, Bono CM, Charles-Malveaux WMS, et al. Lumbar interbody fusion: review of history, complications, and outcome comparisons among methods. Current Orthopedic Practice 2012;23:193–202.
   Google Scholar
• Cole CD, McCall TD, Schmidt MH, et al. Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2009;2:118–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, et al. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2001;26:567–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer HM. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 1997;22:691–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong JM, Hilmi R, et al. Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients. Asian Spine J 2012;6:89–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, et al. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2006;6:435–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee YS, Park SW, Kim YB. Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological outcomes. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2014;55:248–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berjano P, Langella F, Damilano M, et al. Fusion rate following extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2015;24: 369–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein NE. Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion: do the cons outweigh the pros? Surg Neurol Int 2016;7:S692–S700.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fritzell P, Hagg O, Nordwall A. Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Eur Spine J 2003;12:178–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar