Five psychological mechanisms that might bias learning from neurosurgical complications: case discussions and a narrative review

References

• Sokol DK, Wilson J. What is a surgical complication? World J Surg 2008;32:942–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth C, Kästner S, Salehi M, Kleffmann J, Böker DK, Deinsberger W. Comparison of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage treatment in Germany between 1999 and 2009: results of a survey. Stroke 2012;43:3212–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christakis NA, Asch DA. Biases in how physicians choose to withdraw life support. Lancet 1993;342:642–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg RL, Lindholm T. Gender biases in decisions on euthanasia among Swedish jurors. Nord J Psychiatry 2003;57:469–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly ML, Sulmasy DP, Weil RJ. Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage and the challenge of surgical decision making: a review. Neurosurg Focus 2013;34:E1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DT, Ross M. Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: fact or fiction? Psychol Bull 1975;82:213–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezulis AH, Abramson LY, Hyde JS, Hankin BL. Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychol Bull 2004;130:711–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Luebbert A, Sutter C. Effect of treatment success and empathy on surgeon attributions for back surgery outcomes. J Behav Med 2005;28:301–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Taylor SE. Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Malle BF. The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2006;132:895–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974;185:1124–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redelmeier DA, Shafir E. Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives. JAMA 1995;273:302–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunevicius A, Bilskiene D, Macas A, Tamasauskas A. Hemodynamic response during aneurysm clipping surgery among experienced neurosurgeons. Acta Neurochir 2016;158:221–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solheim O. Is aneurysm surgery too exciting for our own good? Acta Neurochir 2016;158:217–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasa S, Gurney J, Koea J. Potential Consequences of Patient Complications for Surgeon Well-being: A Systematic Review. JAMA Surg 2019;154:451–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetts S, Werne A, Hieshima GB. ‘…and do no harm.”. Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serou N, Sahota L, Husband AK, et al. Systematic review of psychological, emotional and behavioural impacts of surgical incidents on operating theatre staff. Br J Surg Open 2017;1:106–13.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander MD, Van Halbach V, Hetts SW. “And do no harm”: complications in interventional neuroradiology. Handb Clin Neurol 2021;176:395–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sjöberg RL, Lindblad F. Limited disclosure of child sexual abuse in children whose experiences were documented by videotape. AJP 2002;159:312–4.
   Google Scholar
• Vos MS, de Haes JCJM. Denial in cancer patients, an explorative review. Psychooncology 2007;16:12–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud A. The ego and the mechanisms of defence. New York: International Universities Press; 1946.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS. The costs and benefits of denial. In Breznitz S, ed. The denial of stress, NewYork: International Universities Press; 1983:1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kübler-Ross E. On death & dying Simon & Schuster/Touchstone; 1969. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR. Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science 1997;275:1293–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeDoux J. Emotion circuits in the brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 2000;23:155–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscowitz GB, Skurnik I, Galinsky AD. The history of dual-process notions and the future of preconscious control. In Chaiken S, and Trope Y, eds. Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: The Guilford Press; 1999:12–36
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg RL. Free will and neurosurgical resections of the supplementary motor area: a critical review. Acta Neurochir 2021;163:1229–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargen KM, Friedman WA. The science of medical decision making: neurosurgery, errors, and personal cognitive strategies for improving quality of care. World Neurosurg 2014;82:e21–e29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux; New York. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. On the psychology of prediction. Psychol Rev 1973;80:237–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melton AW. Implications of short-term memory for a general theory of memory. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 1963;2:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Penfield W. The interpretive cortex; the stream of consciousness in the human brain can be electrically reactivated. Science 1959;129:1719–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penfield W. Engrams in the human brain: mechanisms of memory. Proc R Soc Med 1968;61:831–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guenther RK. Human cognition. New York: Prentice-Hall; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Loftus EF, Loftus GR. On the permanence of stored information in the human brain. Am Psychol 1980;35:409–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallsten T, Kjellin L, Sjöberg RL. The diagnostic accuracy of questions about past experiences of being mechanically restrained in a population of psychiatric patients. Memory 2008;16:548–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay DS, Read JD. Psychotherapy and memories of childhood sexual abuse: a cognitive perspective. Appl Cognit Psychol 1994;8:281–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg RL, Lindholm T. Children’s autobiographical reports about sexual abuse: a narrative review of the research literature. Nord J Psych 2009;11:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg RL. Child testimonies during an outbreak of witch hysteria: Sweden 1670-1671. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1995;36:1039–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg RL. False allegations of Satanist abuse: case studies from the witch panic in Rättvik 1670-71. Euro Child Adolesc Psych 1997;6:219–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MK, Raye CL. Reality monitoring. Psychol Rev 1981;88:67–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MK, Hashtroudi S, Lindsay DS. Source monitoring. Psychol Bull 1993;114:3–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alba JW, Hasher L. Is memory schematic? Psychological Bulletin 1983;93:203–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett FC. Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1932.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm T, Sjöberg RL, Memon A. Misreporting signs of child abuse: the role of decision-making and outcome information. Scand J Psychol 2014;55:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer SL, Penrod S, Read D, Cutler B. Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: a meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychol Bull 1995;118:315–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B. Debiasing. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, and Tversky A, eds. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1982:422–444
   Google Scholar
• Croskerry P, Singhal G, Mamede S. Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing. BMJ Qual Saf 2013a;22(Suppl 2):ii58–ii64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croskerry P, Singhal G, Mamede S. Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change. BMJ Qual Saf 2013b;22(Suppl 2):ii65–ii72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkes HR. Costs and benefits of judgment errors: implications for debiasing. Psychol Bull 1991;110:486–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar