A new comprehensive grading for giant pituitary adenomas: SLAP grading

References

• Iglesias P. Giant pituitary adenoma: histological types, clinical features and therapeutic approaches. Endocrine 2018;61:407–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Cincu R, Goel A. Current concepts and controversies in the management of non-functioning giant pituitary macroadenomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2007;109:645–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serioli S, Doglietto F, Fiorindi A, et al. Pituitary adenomas and invasiveness from anatomo-surgical, radiological, and histological perspectives: a systematic literature review. Cancers 2019;11:1936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edal AL, Skjödt K, Nepper-Rasmussen HJ. SIPAP-a new MR classification for pituitary adenomas. Suprasellar, infrasellar, parasellar, anterior and posterior. Acta Radiol 1997;38:30–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DMS, et al. Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of giant pituitary adenomas. Pituitary 2012;15:150–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Lin S, Wei L, et al. Analysis of operative efficacy for giant pituitary adenoma. BMC Surg 2014;14:59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanda A, Konar SK, Maiti TK, et al. Stratification of predictive factors to assess resectability and surgical outcome in clinoidal meningioma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016;142:31–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney MA, Hardesty DA, Sheehy JP, et al. Rater reliability of the hardy classification for pituitary adenomas in the magnetic resonance imaging era. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017;78:413–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney MA, Hardesty DA, Sheehy JP, et al. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the Knosp scale for pituitary adenoma grading. J Neurosurg 2017;126:1714–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy J, Vezina JL. Transsphenoidal neurosurgery of intracranial neoplasm. Adv Neurol 1976;15:261–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson CB. A decade of pituitary microsurgery. The Herbert Olivecrona lecture. J Neurosurg 1984;61:814–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C. Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 1993;33:610–7; discussion 617-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel A, Nadkarni T, Muzumdar D, et al. Giant pituitary tumors: a study based on surgical treatment of 118 cases. Surg Neurol 2004;61:436–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dhandapani S, Singh H, Negm HM, et al. Literature review cavernous sinus invasion in pituitary adenomas: systematic review and pooled data meta-analysis of radiologic criteria and comparison of endoscopic and microscopic surgery. World Neurosurg 2016;96:36–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Maio S, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach for selected pituitary adenomas: early experience. J Neurosurg 2011;114:345–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallah N, Taghvaei M, Sadaghiani S, et al. Surgical outcome of endoscopic endonasal surgery of large and giant pituitary adenomas: an institutional experience from the Middle East. World Neurosurg 2019;132:e802–e811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marigil Sanchez M, Karekezi C, Almeida JP, et al. Management of giant pituitary adenomas: role and outcome of the endoscopic endonasal surgical approach. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2019;30:433–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusimano MD, Kan P, Nassiri F, et al. Outcomes of surgically treated giant pituitary tumours. Can J Neurol Sci 2012;39:446–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter CP, Nanaszko MJ, Mubita LL, et al. Volumetric classification of pituitary macroadenomas predicts outcome and morbidity following endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Pituitary 2012;15:450–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juraschka K, Khan OH, Godoy BL, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to large and giant pituitary adenomas: institutional experience and predictors of extent of resection . J Neurosurg 2014;121:75–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutourousiou M, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, et al. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for giant pituitary adenomas: advantages and limitations. J Neurosurg 2013;118:621–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gondim JA, Almeida JPC, Albuquerque LAF, et al. Giant pituitary adenomas: surgical outcomes of 50 cases operated on by the endonasal endoscopic approach. World Neurosurg 2014;82:e281–e290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Solari D, et al. Size does not matter. the intrigue of giant adenomas: a true surgical challenge. Acta Neurochir 2014;156:2217–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micko ASG, Wöhrer A, Wolfsberger S, Knosp E. Invasion of the cavernous sinus space in pituitary adenomas: endoscopic verification and its correlation with an MRI-based classification. J Neurosurg 2015;122:803–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peto I, Abou-Al-Shaar H, White TG, et al. Sources of residuals after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for large and giant pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir 2020;2341–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad FU, Pandey P, Mahapatra AK. Post operative 'pituitary apoplexy' in giant pituitary adenomas: a series of cases. Neurol India 2005;53:326–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suero Molina E, Di Somma A, Stummer W, et al. Clinical vasospasm after an extended endoscopic endonasal approach for recurrent pituitary adenoma: illustrative case and systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2019;128:29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen WS, Wei L, Jing JJ, Zhang SM. Three-dimensional reconstruction and morphological characterization of pituitary macroadenomas. Arch Med Sci 2016;12:576–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linsler S, Hero-Gross R, Friesenhahn-Ochs B, et al. Preservation of hormonal function by identifying pituitary gland at endoscopic surgery. J Clin Neurosci 2017;43:240–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linsler S, Senger S, Hero-Gross R, et al. The endoscopic surgical resection of intrasellar lesions conserves the hormonal function: a negative correlation to the microsurgical technique. J Neurosurg Sci 2021;64:515–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshazly K, Kshettry VR, Farrell CJ, et al. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic endonasal resection of giant pituitary adenomas. World Neurosurg 2018;114:e447–e456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen M, Chen Z, Shou X, et al. Surgical outcomes and predictors of visual function alterations after transcranial surgery for large-to-giant pituitary adenomas. World Neurosurg 2020;141:e60–e69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Zhang J, Li J, et al. The role of multimodal navigation in endoscopic endonasal surgery for giant pituitary adenomas. Gland Surg 2019;8:663–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar